Last updated 1 week ago. Our resources are updated regularly but please keep in mind that links, programs, policies, and contact information do change.
President Donald Trump exercised his executive clemency power on November 28, 2025, to pardon Juan Orlando Hernández, the former President of Honduras, who was serving a 45-year sentence in a U.S. federal penitentiary for drug trafficking and weapons offenses.
The pardon, announced via the social media platform Truth Social just forty-eight hours before a pivotal general election in Honduras, resulted in Hernández’s immediate release from the U.S. Penitentiary Hazelton in West Virginia on December 1, 2025.
Hernández, known universally by his initials JOH, had been convicted by a jury in the Southern District of New York in March 2024 for conspiring to import over 400 tons of cocaine into the United States, a scheme prosecutors described as “state-sponsored drug trafficking” involving the abuse of the Honduran military and national police.
President Trump framed the conviction as a “set-up” orchestrated by the Biden administration, asserting that Hernández had been “treated very harshly and unfairly.”
The pardon serves as a forceful reassertion of President Trump’s transactional foreign policy doctrine, prioritizing personal loyalty and political alignment over institutional judicial outcomes. By intervening directly in the Honduran political landscape, backing National Party candidate Nasry “Tito” Asfura, and releasing the party’s former leader, the Trump administration has fundamentally altered the diplomatic architecture of the Western Hemisphere.
The Election Context
To understand the timing and motivation behind the pardon, you need to examine the immediate political context: the Honduran general election of November 30, 2025. The release of Juan Orlando Hernández was not an isolated act of clemency but a strategic maneuver designed to influence the outcome of a contest the Trump administration viewed as critical to its regional interests.
By late 2025, the geopolitical map of Latin America had shifted in ways unfavorable to the Trump White House. The “Pink Tide,” a resurgence of leftist governments, had solidified control in key nations. Honduras, under President Xiomara Castro of the Liberty and Refoundation (LIBRE) party, had pivoted away from traditional U.S. hegemony, strengthening ties with China, Venezuela, and Cuba.
For President Trump, viewing the region through the lens of Great Power competition and migration control, the potential reelection of a LIBRE candidate represented a national security failure.
The 2025 election was a referendum on the country’s direction. The Trump administration identified the restoration of the conservative National Party as a mechanism to break the leftist bloc in Central America. The pardon of Hernández was calculated to galvanize the conservative base, recast the narrative of the past decade, and delegitimize the “corruption” charges that had plagued the National Party since Hernández’s extradition in 2022.
The Candidates
The election featured a tight, three-way race that reflected the deep polarization of Honduran society:
| Candidate | Party | Ideological Alignment | Relationship to U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nasry “Tito” Asfura | National Party (Partido Nacional) | Right-wing / Conservative | Trump’s Endorsed Candidate. Former Mayor of Tegucigalpa. Viewed as a continuity of the Hernández era but with a populist “builder” image. |
| Rixi Moncada | LIBRE (Liberty and Refoundation) | Leftist / Socialist | Opposed by Trump. Former Finance and Defense Minister under Xiomara Castro. Associated with the Zelaya family and the Bolivarian Alliance. |
| Salvador Nasralla | Liberal Party (Partido Liberal) | Centrist / Populist | Dismissed by Trump. TV host and perennial candidate. Formerly allied with LIBRE in 2021, now running on a centrist anti-corruption platform. |
On Friday, November 28, 2025, President Trump intervened with unprecedented directness. Taking to Truth Social, he explicitly linked U.S. foreign aid to an Asfura victory.
“If [Asfura] doesn’t win, the United States will not be throwing good money after bad, because a wrong Leader can only bring catastrophic results to a country,” Trump wrote. He further warned that if the election results were manipulated by the ruling party, “there will be hell to pay.”
This threat was coupled with the announcement of the pardon. The dual messaging was clear: The U.S. supports the National Party, vindicates its former leader, and threatens economic strangulation if the left retains power.
The Results
The election results, released slowly by the National Electoral Council in the days following the November 30 vote, precipitated a crisis. As of December 2, 2025, the results showed a “technical tie” between Nasry Asfura and Salvador Nasralla, with the leftist Rixi Moncada trailing significantly.
Preliminary Results (57.03% Reporting):
- Nasry Asfura (National): 749,022 votes (39.92%)
- Salvador Nasralla (Liberal): 748,507 votes (39.89%)
- Rixi Moncada (LIBRE): 359,584 votes (19.16%)
The margin between the top two candidates was fewer than 600 votes, a statistical dead heat that paralyzed the country. The injection of the Hernández pardon into this volatile environment added an incendiary element.
While Asfura’s supporters viewed the pardon as a vindication that energized their turnout, the opposition viewed it as a gross violation of Honduran sovereignty and an endorsement of criminality. The closeness of the race meant that Trump’s intervention may have successfully consolidated the National Party vote, preventing a LIBRE victory, but it also created a governability crisis with no clear winner.
The Narco-State Conviction
To comprehend the magnitude of the pardon, you need to examine the criminal enterprise for which Hernández was convicted. The term “narco-state” is frequently used in hyperbolic political discourse, but in the case of Honduras under Hernández (2014–2022), it was the formal legal theory presented by the U.S. Department of Justice and validated by a federal jury.
The Cocaine Superhighway
Honduras serves as a critical transshipment point for cocaine originating in South America (Colombia and Venezuela), destined for the United States. During the trial United States v. Juan Orlando Hernández, prosecutors established that Hernández didn’t merely ignore this traffic—he industrialized it. Assistant U.S. Attorney Jacob Gutwillig described Hernández as having “paved a cocaine superhighway to the United States.”
The mechanics of this superhighway involved the complete co-optation of the state’s security apparatus. Drug shipments arriving via maritime vessels in the Caribbean or light aircraft in the remote department of Gracias a Dios were met not by interdiction teams, but by military escorts.
These escorts, armed with high-powered weaponry and utilizing state vehicles, ensured the safe passage of narcotics to the Guatemalan border. In exchange, the drug cartels fueled the National Party’s political machinery with millions of dollars in illicit cash.
The Cartels
Hernández’s administration was characterized by selective enforcement. While he publicly touted extradition statistics and asset seizures to satisfy U.S. diplomats, evidence showed he was systematically eliminating his partners’ rivals while protecting his own financiers.
Two primary cartels operated under this umbrella of protection:
Los Cachiros: Led by Devis Leonel Rivera Maradiaga, this violent organization dominated the Atlantic coast. Rivera Maradiaga, who admitted to causing 78 murders, became a star witness for the prosecution. He testified to paying a $250,000 bribe to Hernández in 2012, delivered to the President’s sister and communications minister, Hilda Hernández (now deceased). In return, the Cachiros received government contracts for road construction, legitimizing their front companies and protection from extradition.
The Valle Valle Cartel: Operating in the western highlands, this clan initially enjoyed protection but eventually fell out of favor. Their eventual extradition was cited by Hernández’s defense as proof of his anti-drug credentials. However, prosecutors argued that their removal was a consolidation move to monopolize the trade for Hernández’s preferred partners, including his brother Tony.
The El Chapo Connection
The most damning evidence linking Hernández to international organized crime was his connection to the Sinaloa Cartel. During the trial of his brother, Juan Antonio “Tony” Hernández, and later in his own trial, witnesses detailed a meeting in 2013 where Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán personally delivered $1 million in cash to Tony Hernández.
This payment was a campaign contribution for Juan Orlando Hernández’s 2013 presidential bid. The quid pro quo was explicit: the Sinaloa Cartel required unimpeded access through Honduras to move product from Colombia to Mexico.
Tony Hernández, acting as the intermediary, assured El Chapo that the military would provide radar evasion and security. The “TH” stamped kilograms of cocaine, bearing Tony’s initials, became a symbol of the impunity with which the President’s family operated.
The Infamous Quote
Another pivotal figure in the evidentiary record was Geovanny Fuentes Ramírez, a violent trafficker who operated a clandestine cocaine laboratory in the Cortés Department. Witness testimony placed President Hernández at meetings with Fuentes Ramírez in 2013 and 2014.
It was during these meetings that Hernández allegedly uttered the phrase that would come to define the prosecution’s case: “We’re going to shove the drugs right up the noses of the gringos.”
This statement, corroborated by witnesses who saw Hernández accept bribes in exchange for military protection of the lab, dismantled his defense that he was a loyal U.S. ally. It portrayed a leader who harbored deep cynicism toward the United States, viewing the superpower not as a partner, but as a market to be exploited and a political patron to be manipulated.
The Trump Alliance (2017–2021)
The roots of the 2025 pardon lie in the first term of the Trump administration. While U.S. prosecutors in New York were quietly building their case against “CC-4” (Co-Conspirator 4, later identified as Hernández), the White House was embracing him as a “great President” and a key strategic partner.
This divergence between the Department of Justice and the Executive Branch created the paradox that Trump would later exploit.
The Deal
Following the highly controversial 2017 Honduran election, which was marred by credible allegations of fraud and a suspicious blackout of the voting system, the Organization of American States called for a new vote. The State Department, however, under the Trump administration, recognized Hernández’s victory.
This recognition provided Hernández with critical international legitimacy at a moment when his domestic mandate was crumbling.
In exchange for this political lifeline, Hernández aligned himself completely with Donald Trump’s two most pressing foreign policy priorities: controlling irregular migration and supporting the State of Israel.
Migration Control
The primary currency of the relationship was migration control. In 2019, as apprehension numbers at the U.S. southern border spiked, President Trump threatened tariffs on Mexico and aid cuts to Central America. Hernández responded by signing an “Asylum Cooperative Agreement,” frequently referred to as a “Safe Third Country” agreement.
Under the terms of this deal, the U.S. could deport asylum seekers from other nations (such as Cuba, Nicaragua, or Haiti) to Honduras, denying them the right to apply for asylum in the United States.
The agreement was controversial. Human rights organizations pointed out the absurdity of sending refugees to one of the most violent countries in the hemisphere. Yet, for Trump, it was a tangible policy win he could present to his base. DHS Acting Secretary Chad Wolf praised Hernández for his “leadership” and “hard work,” solidifying the narrative that Honduras was a cooperating partner in securing the U.S. border.
The Jerusalem Embassy
The second pillar of the alliance was ideological. In December 2017, Trump recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, a move that drew international condemnation. Hernández, seeking to ingratiate himself further with Trump and his evangelical base, followed suit.
In 2021, Honduras became only the fourth country in the world to move its embassy to Jerusalem. This action was of high symbolic value to the Trump administration.
Hernández visited Jerusalem to inaugurate the embassy, signing bilateral agreements with Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett. By positioning Honduras as one of Israel’s staunchest allies, Hernández effectively integrated himself into the Trump administration’s inner circle of favored foreign leaders, creating a reservoir of goodwill that would pay dividends years later.
The Dual Reality
During this period (2017-2021), a dual reality existed.
Reality A (The White House): Hernández was a partner in stopping caravans and supporting Israel. Trump publicly stated, “He is working with the United States very closely… We’re stopping drugs at a level that has never happened.”
Reality B (The SDNY): Hernández was the head of a criminal conspiracy. In October 2019, a federal jury convicted his brother, Tony. During that trial, prosecutors publicly named the President as a co-conspirator who received bribes.
Trump chose to ignore Reality B, focusing entirely on the transactional benefits of Reality A. This compartmentalization laid the groundwork for the “set up” narrative: Trump could plausibly claim (to his supporters) that since Hernández helped him stop drugs and migrants, the DOJ’s accusations must be false or politically motivated.
The Fall
The transition to the Biden administration in January 2021 marked the end of Hernández’s immunity. The Biden White House adopted a strategy that viewed high-level corruption as a root cause of migration, prioritizing the dismantling of kleptocratic networks over short-term transactional deals.
The Visa Revocation
In July 2021, the U.S. State Department included Juan Orlando Hernández on the “Engel List” of corrupt and undemocratic actors, revoking his visa. This was the first formal diplomatic signal that his protection had evaporated. When Xiomara Castro won the November 2021 election, Hernández’s domestic shield also crumbled.
The Arrest
Hernández left office on January 27, 2022. He attempted to secure immunity by being sworn in as a representative to the Central American Parliament (PARLACEN) mere hours later. The U.S. government moved faster.
On February 14, the extradition request was transmitted. On February 15, Honduran police surrounded his home. The images of his arrest were broadcast globally: the former President, shackled at the wrists and ankles, wearing a bulletproof vest, paraded before the cameras.
For the Honduran public, it was a moment of catharsis. For the Biden administration, it was a demonstration that no one was above the law. He was extradited to New York in April 2022 to face trial.
The Trial and Conviction
The trial of Juan Orlando Hernández in early 2024 was a dismantling of his presidency. Held under strict security in Manhattan, it laid bare the mechanics of the conspiracy.
Hernández’s defense team argued that the witnesses were fabricating testimony to reduce their own sentences, a “magic key” to freedom. They sought to introduce classified information regarding Hernández’s work with the CIA and DEA to prove he was a verified partner.
Judge P. Kevin Castel strictly limited this line of defense, ruling that cooperation with U.S. agencies on some matters didn’t negate criminal conspiracy on others. The prosecution argued that Hernández played a double game: he extradited minor traffickers to the U.S. to maintain appearances while protecting his major partners who paid bribes.
The Verdict
On March 8, 2024, the jury returned a guilty verdict on all three counts: conspiracy to import cocaine, possession of machine guns and destructive devices, and conspiracy to possess machine guns.
On June 26, 2024, Judge Castel sentenced Hernández to 45 years in prison. In his sentencing statement, Castel remarked that the sentence should serve as a warning to “well educated, well dressed” individuals who believe their status insulates them from justice.
The conviction was hailed by the Biden DOJ as a victory for the rule of law, but it set the stage for Trump’s intervention.
The Pardon Rationale
President Trump’s decision to pardon Hernández in November 2025 was framed not as an act of mercy, but as a correction of a judicial wrong.
The “Set Up” Narrative
Trump’s justification relied on a conspiracy theory that aligned with his broader domestic political rhetoric. “The people of Honduras really thought he was set up, and it was a terrible thing,” Trump told reporters. “They basically said he was a drug dealer because he was the president of the country. And they said it was a Biden administration set-up. And I looked at the facts, and I agreed with them.”
By labeling the prosecution a “Biden administration set-up,” Trump achieved a dual victory:
Domestic: He reinforced the narrative that the DOJ and FBI are weaponized political tools that target his allies (and himself). Pardoning Hernández was a proxy war against the same prosecutors who had pursued Trump.
International: He signaled to foreign leaders that loyalty to him offers protection against U.S. institutions. The message was that the “Deep State” (DOJ/DEA) might investigate them, but the “President” (Trump) could save them.
The Legal Mechanism
The pardon of a foreign head of state is rare but constitutionally sound. Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution grants the President “Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States.” This power is plenary and extends to any federal crime, regardless of the offender’s nationality.
While the pardon wipes away the criminal sentence, it doesn’t automatically resolve immigration status. Under the Immigration and Nationality Act, a pardon doesn’t necessarily waive inadmissibility for drug trafficking “aggravated felonies.”
However, the Executive Branch has discretion. It appears the Trump administration facilitated Hernández’s immediate departure from the U.S. rather than detaining him for deportation proceedings, allowing for a “voluntary departure” or similar mechanism to return him to Honduras.
The Contradiction
The pardon creates a jarring contradiction in Trump’s 2025 policy. At the same time he was pardoning Hernández, the Trump administration was conducting an aggressive military campaign in the Caribbean, designating cartels as “foreign terrorist organizations” and bombing drug boats.
Policy A: Bombing low-level drug runners in the name of the “War on Drugs.”
Policy B: Pardoning the man convicted of facilitating 400 tons of cocaine shipments.
Critics, including Senator Tim Kaine, pointed to this as proof that Trump “cares nothing about narcotrafficking” and views the drug war merely as a political tool to be wielded against enemies (like Venezuela’s Maduro) and suspended for friends (like Hernández).
The Aftermath
As of December 2, 2025, Hernández’s release has plunged Honduras into legal and political uncertainty.
The Double Jeopardy Question
Hernández’s return to Honduras triggers a constitutional crisis regarding whether he can be prosecuted domestically.
Article 96 of the Honduran Constitution prohibits double jeopardy: “No one shall be… tried a second time for the same punishable acts for which a previous trial was held.”
Hernández’s defense will argue that the U.S. trial covers the “acts” of drug trafficking from 2004-2022. Since he was tried (and pardoned), they’ll claim res judicata—the matter is settled.
The Prosecution Argument: Honduran Attorney General’s office has vowed to pursue justice. They may argue that the pardon “erased” the U.S. punishment, or focus on crimes not covered in the U.S. indictment, such as electoral fraud, embezzlement of state funds, or specific murders in Honduras.
However, the Honduran judiciary remains populated by judges appointed during the Hernández era. The fear among civil society is that the pardon will be used by local courts to dismiss all charges, granting him total impunity.
Civil Unrest
The pardon has inflamed the post-election chaos. Supporters of the National Party view the pardon as validation of their candidate, Asfura, and have mobilized in the streets to “defend the victory.”
Conversely, the opposition (LIBRE and Liberal Party) views the pardon as an act of imperial aggression designed to impose a corrupt regime back onto the country.
With the election results in a technical tie and the country’s most polarizing figure returning home as a free man, Honduras faces the prospect of prolonged civil unrest. The U.S. Embassy, now under Trump’s directive, is likely to pressure the electoral council to certify Asfura, using the pardon as leverage to show that the “corruption” narrative was false all along.
Key Insights
| Theme | Insight |
|---|---|
| Transactional Diplomacy | The pardon confirms that for Trump, foreign relations are personal and transactional. JOH’s loyalty on Israel and migration outweighed 400 tons of cocaine. |
| Delegitimization of Institutions | Trump used the pardon to attack the DOJ and FBI, framing the prosecution of a foreign ally as a “Deep State” conspiracy, mirroring his domestic defense strategy. |
| Geopolitical Realignment | The move was a strategic intervention to swing the 2025 election to the right, aiming to break the “Pink Tide” alliance of Honduras-Venezuela-Cuba. |
| The End of the Drug War Consensus | The pardon effectively ends the bipartisan consensus on the “War on Drugs” in Latin America. It signals that drug trafficking is a forgivable offense for U.S. political allies, shattering U.S. credibility on rule-of-law issues. |
The pardon of Juan Orlando Hernández is a watershed moment in U.S.-Latin American relations. It establishes a precedent that American justice is malleable to executive interest. For aspiring autocrats in the region, the lesson is clear: alignment with the right faction in Washington offers better protection than adherence to the law.
As December 2025 progresses, the focus shifts to the streets of Tegucigalpa. If Nasry Asfura is declared the winner and Hernández walks free in Honduras, the Trump administration will have successfully engineered a regime change through a combination of digital diplomacy, economic threats, and executive clemency.
However, this victory comes at the cost of the institutional credibility of the United States, leaving a legacy of cynicism that will likely define hemispheric relations for the remainder of the decade.
Our articles make government information more accessible. Please consult a qualified professional for financial, legal, or health advice specific to your circumstances.
