Last updated 1 month ago. Our resources are updated regularly but please keep in mind that links, programs, policies, and contact information do change.
Youth homelessness is a significant challenge across the United States, leaving many young people vulnerable when they run away from home or find themselves without stable housing.
Fortunately, a dedicated network of services and support systems exists to help these youth navigate difficult times. This guide offers a comprehensive overview of the assistance available, explaining the types of services, the organizations that provide them, and how young people, their families, and concerned individuals can connect with helpful resources.
Understanding Runaway and Homeless Youth (RHY)
To effectively address the needs of young people facing homelessness, it is essential to understand who they are, the scale of the issue, the reasons they become homeless, and which groups are at higher risk.
Federal Definitions and Age Groups
The U.S. federal government, primarily through the Runaway and Homeless Youth (RHY) Act administered by the Family and Youth Services Bureau (FYSB), provides specific definitions for “runaway youth” and “homeless youth” to guide service provision.
A “runaway youth” is defined as an individual under the age of 18 who leaves home or their place of legal residence without the permission of a parent or legal guardian. This definition is important because it often triggers specific interventions aimed at immediate safety and, where appropriate, family reunification.
A “homeless youth” is an individual who cannot live safely with a parent, legal guardian, or relative and who has no other safe alternative living arrangement. This definition is broader, encompassing young people facing a variety of unsafe or unstable housing situations, not necessarily tied to leaving home without permission.
The age eligibility for these federally supported services can vary depending on the specific FYSB program. For instance, the Basic Center Program (BCP) primarily serves youth under 18 years of age. However, there is some flexibility; if state or local laws and licensing requirements for youth-serving facilities permit, BCPs can use RHY funding to provide shelter and services to homeless youth aged 18 and older. In contrast, the Transitional Living Program (TLP) and Maternity Group Home (MGH) programs are designed for homeless youth who are at least 16 years old but less than 22 years old.
These distinctions in definition and age eligibility are critical for youth, families, and service providers to understand which programs are most appropriate. The differing circumstances implied by “runaway” (often prompting family contact efforts by programs like BCPs within 72 hours) versus “homeless” (which may necessitate longer-term housing solutions if family environments are unsafe) can shape the initial support strategies. Furthermore, the potential for state and local laws to influence BCP age limits means that access to emergency shelter for older youth, such as an 18-year-old, may not be uniform across the country, highlighting the importance of checking local program specifics.
The Scope of Youth Homelessness in the U.S.
The number of young people experiencing homelessness in the United States is a serious concern. Estimates indicate that approximately 4.2 million youth and young adults experience some form of homelessness each year, with about 700,000 of these being unaccompanied minors—meaning they are not in the care of a parent or guardian. This translates to roughly one in ten young adults aged 18 to 25, and one in thirty youth aged 13 to 17, facing homelessness annually.
Data from the U.S. Department of Education further illuminates the issue within school systems. During the 2021-2022 school year, public schools identified 1.2 million students as experiencing homelessness, which marked a 10% increase from the previous school year. A significant portion of these students, over 75%, were experiencing “hidden homelessness.” This term refers to situations where youth are not visibly on the streets or in shelters but are instead “couch surfing” with friends or relatives, staying in motels, or living in other unstable and often unsafe temporary arrangements.
The prevalence of hidden homelessness suggests that official counts, such as the Point-in-Time (PIT) counts which typically focus on sheltered and unsheltered individuals on a single night, likely underestimate the true number of young people without stable housing. This makes proactive outreach efforts and identification through schools and other community touchpoints especially critical. The reported 10% rise in student homelessness could be due to various factors, including worsening economic conditions, residual impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic, or potentially improved identification methods by schools; regardless of the precise cause, this trend underscores the growing need for adaptable prevention strategies and robust school-based supports.
Common Reasons Youth Experience Homelessness
Young people become homeless for a multitude of complex and often interconnected reasons. Family conflict is the most frequently cited factor leading to youth running away or becoming homeless. Such conflicts can arise from a wide range of issues, including general family dysfunction, different expectations, or more severe problems like physical, emotional, or sexual abuse, and neglect.
For many Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, or Questioning (LGBTQ+) youth, family rejection specifically related to their sexual orientation or gender identity is a primary cause of their homelessness. The Congressional Research Service has also identified a youth’s sexual orientation, along with school problems, pregnancy, and substance use, as significant risk factors that can contribute to family conflict or disagreements severe enough to result in a young person leaving or being forced out of their home.
Other major contributors to youth homelessness include poverty, which strains family resources and stability, and involvement with public systems. Youth aging out of the foster care system often face a “cliff effect,” where supports are withdrawn without adequate preparation for independent living, leading to high rates of homelessness. Similarly, youth who have been involved in the juvenile justice system also experience an increased likelihood of homelessness.
Many of these underlying causes—abuse, neglect, systemic failures in child welfare—are deeply traumatic. This reality necessitates that services for runaway and homeless youth are not only focused on providing shelter but are also equipped to deliver trauma-informed care that addresses these past experiences. The connection between “school problems” and family conflict leading to homelessness points to a potentially cyclical issue: difficulties at school might heighten family tensions, or an unstable family life could undermine school performance, with both pathways increasing the risk of homelessness. This interplay suggests a need for integrated support strategies involving schools, family services, and RHY programs to address these intertwined challenges.
Youth Populations at Higher Risk
While youth from all backgrounds can experience homelessness, certain populations face a disproportionately higher risk due to systemic inequities, discrimination, and specific vulnerabilities.
LGBTQ+ Youth: Young people who identify as LGBTQ+ are significantly more likely to experience homelessness. They are reported to be 120% more likely to become homeless than their non-LGBTQ+ peers. Although LGBTQ+ youth make up a smaller percentage of the overall youth population (around 7%), they represent an estimated 40% of all young people experiencing homelessness. A primary driver for this disparity is family conflict and rejection stemming from the youth’s sexual orientation or gender identity.
Youth of Color: Racial and ethnic disparities are also stark. Black youth have the highest rates of running away from home. Compared to their White peers, Black youth face an 83% higher risk of reporting homelessness, and Hispanic youth face a 33% higher risk. Native American youth experience more than double the risk of homelessness compared to other youth.
Youth with Foster Care Involvement: The child welfare system is often described as a “highway to homelessness” for many young people. More than 23,000 youth age out of the foster care system each year. Estimates suggest that about 20% of these young people become homeless immediately upon emancipation, and this figure rises to as many as 46% experiencing homelessness by age 26. Nearly one-third of all youth experiencing homelessness report having been in the foster care system at some point.
Youth with Juvenile Justice Involvement: There is a strong link between involvement in the juvenile justice system and youth homelessness. Studies show that 46% of youth who have experienced homelessness have also been held in a juvenile detention facility, jail, or prison, a rate significantly higher than the 15% found in the general youth population. Furthermore, approximately 57% of youth experiencing homelessness have prior records of involvement with either the foster care system, the juvenile justice system, or both.
Other At-Risk Groups: Young parents also disproportionately experience homelessness. Additionally, youth who have not completed high school or obtained a GED are 346% more likely to experience homelessness than their peers who have graduated.
The overrepresentation of these specific groups in the homeless youth population is not coincidental but rather points to deeper systemic inequities and failures within other societal support systems, including family structures, child welfare, juvenile justice, and education. Homelessness for these youth is often the culmination of these intersecting vulnerabilities. For instance, the foster care system, designed to provide safety and stability, unfortunately becomes a direct pathway to homelessness for many. This indicates a critical need for reforms and better transitional support within such systems.
Moreover, young people who exist at the intersection of these identities—for example, Black LGBTQ+ youth, who are noted to experience some of the highest rates of homelessness—may face compounded layers of discrimination and barriers when trying to access safe, affirming, and effective services. This necessitates that service providers develop highly specialized, culturally competent approaches to meet these complex and individualized needs, moving beyond generalized models of care.
The Runaway and Homeless Youth Act (RHYA): Foundation of Federal Support
The primary federal legislative framework for supporting young people experiencing homelessness is the Runaway and Homeless Youth Act (RHYA). Understanding its purpose and principles is key to understanding the services available.
What is the RHYA and What Does It Aim to Do?
The Runaway and Homeless Youth Act (RHYA) is the cornerstone of federal efforts to provide services and support to runaway and homeless youth. First enacted in 1974, the RHYA has been reauthorized and amended multiple times to adapt to the evolving needs of this vulnerable population. Recent legislative efforts, such as the proposed Runaway and Homeless Youth and Trafficking Prevention Act of 2023 (H.R.6041), seek to further strengthen its provisions.
The core purpose of the RHYA is to fund and support the establishment and strengthening of community-based programs. These programs are designed to provide temporary shelter, counseling, and aftercare services to young people who have run away or are experiencing homelessness. The Act explicitly recognizes that these youth are at significant risk of experiencing serious health issues, behavioral and emotional challenges, exploitation, and human trafficking.
A fundamental tenet of the RHYA is to offer these services as an alternative to involving youth in the law enforcement, child welfare (often meaning institutional care), mental health (particularly institutional settings), and juvenile justice systems. This reflects a policy choice that these youth primarily need support and protection, rather than punitive measures or institutionalization, framing youth homelessness as a social service issue. The Act aims to foster the development of an effective and comprehensive system of care that includes prevention services, emergency shelter, transitional living options, and aftercare support to ensure a continuum of assistance.
The evolution of the RHYA, exemplified by proposals like the “Runaway and Homeless Youth and Trafficking Prevention Act,” demonstrates an increasing legislative focus on the critical intersection between youth homelessness and human trafficking. This awareness is leading to the development of more targeted strategies for preventing trafficking and intervening to protect these highly vulnerable young people, who are often targeted by exploiters within hours of becoming homeless.
Guiding Principles: Positive Youth Development and Trauma-Informed Care
Services developed and funded under the RHYA are guided by key philosophical approaches designed to ensure that interventions are holistic, empowering, and responsive to the unique experiences of young people.
Positive Youth Development (PYD) is a mandated approach for RHYA-funded services. PYD is a philosophy and practice that focuses on the strengths and potential of young people rather than their deficits. It aims to create environments where youth can experience a sense of:
- Safety and structure
- Belonging and membership
- Self-worth, empowerment, voice, and choice (or opportunities for social contribution)
- Independence and control over their own lives
The underlying belief of PYD is that the most effective way to reduce risk behaviors and outcomes is to help young people achieve their full potential. This is accomplished by providing opportunities for them to develop skills, exercise leadership, and become actively involved in their communities.
Trauma-Informed Care (TIC) is another critical principle integrated into RHY services. The Family and Youth Services Bureau (FYSB) requires its funded projects to adopt a TIC approach. This involves a deep understanding of the prevalence and impact of trauma—recognizing that many, if not most, runaway and homeless youth have experienced significant traumatic events such as abuse, neglect, or violence. TIC means responding to the symptoms of chronic, interpersonal trauma and traumatic stress, as well as understanding the behavioral and mental health consequences that can arise from these experiences. A key aspect of TIC is shifting the perspective of service providers from asking “What’s wrong with you?” to instead asking “What has happened to you?”, which fosters empathy and a more supportive environment.
The integration of PYD and TIC as foundational principles marks a significant evolution in how services for RHY are conceptualized. It moves beyond merely providing basic shelter and instead aims to holistically address the developmental, emotional, and psychological needs of these young people. This approach acknowledges that RHY are not simply “cases” to be managed but individuals with inherent worth and potential who have often faced considerable adversity.
Effectively implementing PYD and TIC is not a simple checklist item; it requires ongoing commitment from organizations, including comprehensive staff training, and often a significant cultural shift within service agencies. It necessitates a fundamental change in how services are designed and delivered, moving towards practices that actively involve youth in program development and feedback, as highlighted by FYSB’s emphasis on “Leading in Partnership with Youth and Young Adults.” This has tangible resource implications, including the need for dedicated time and funding for staff training and support to prevent burnout when dealing with complex trauma.
Key Federal Programs Offering Support
Several federal programs, primarily administered by the Family and Youth Services Bureau (FYSB) and the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), form the backbone of the national response to youth homelessness.
The Family and Youth Services Bureau (FYSB): Leading Federal Efforts
The Family and Youth Services Bureau (FYSB), located within the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) at the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), is the principal federal agency responsible for administering programs authorized under the Runaway and Homeless Youth Act. FYSB plays a central role in the national strategy to support and protect RHY. Its efforts include funding for street outreach initiatives, emergency shelters (known as Basic Centers), longer-term transitional living programs, and specialized maternity group homes.
FYSB’s vision extends beyond just distributing funds; it aims to promote overall youth well-being, actively work towards preventing and ultimately ending youth homelessness, and champion a holistic approach to adolescent development. This is achieved by fostering collaborative partnerships across communities, promoting data-driven practices to improve service effectiveness, and ensuring that youth voices are integrated into program design and implementation.
The Bureau’s role encompasses setting program standards, providing crucial training and technical assistance to grantees (often facilitated by the Runaway and Homeless Youth Training, Technical Assistance, and Capacity Building Center – RHYTTAC), and collecting national data through systems like the Runaway and Homeless Youth Management Information System (RHYMIS) to better understand the needs of RHY and evaluate program outcomes.
FYSB’s position within HHS/ACF, alongside other programs focused on children and families (such as child welfare services, although RHYA programs are designed as alternatives), creates potential, albeit sometimes complex, opportunities for coordination across various systems that serve vulnerable youth and their families.
Basic Center Program (BCP): Immediate Shelter and Crisis Intervention
The Basic Center Program (BCP), funded by FYSB, plays a critical role in providing immediate safety and crisis intervention for runaway and homeless youth.
Purpose: BCPs work to establish or strengthen community-based programs that meet the urgent needs of RHY, who are typically under the age of 18 (though some exceptions allow services for older youth if permitted by state or local law), and their families. These centers offer crisis care and are designed as an alternative to involving youth in the juvenile justice or child welfare systems.
Core Services Provided:
All BCPs are required to offer a range of essential services, including:
- Emergency shelter: Safe, temporary housing for up to 21 days.
- Basic needs: Food, clothing, and access to medical care, provided either directly or through referrals.
- Counseling: Individual, group, and family counseling to address the immediate crisis and underlying issues.
- Crisis intervention: Immediate support to de-escalate crises and stabilize youth.
- Recreation programs: Positive and engaging activities for youth.
- Education and employment assistance: Support to help youth continue their education or find employment.
- Outreach: Efforts to connect with youth who may need assistance and to collaborate with other agencies.
- Aftercare services: Support for youth after they leave the shelter to promote a stable transition.
A key objective of BCPs is to reunite young people with their families whenever possible and safe, or to help them find appropriate alternative living arrangements if reunification is not in their best interest. Programs are required to develop adequate plans for contacting parents or other relatives, typically within 72 hours of a youth entering the program, always prioritizing the youth’s safety and well-being.
Who is Eligible and For How Long?: BCPs primarily serve runaway and homeless youth under the age of 18. The emergency shelter stay is generally limited to a maximum of 21 days. This relatively short duration underscores the BCP’s role as an emergency, short-term intervention focused on immediate safety, crisis stabilization, and rapid connection to the next appropriate step, whether that is family reunification, an alternative placement, or other support services.
The requirement for BCPs to attempt family contact within 72 hours, while also acting in the “best interests of the youth” and having procedures for situations where youth refuse to disclose parental information, presents a delicate operational balance. Staff must skillfully navigate these situations, respecting youth autonomy and ensuring their safety while also exploring potential family supports, a task that requires specialized training in crisis negotiation and youth engagement.
Our articles make government information more accessible. Please consult a qualified professional for financial, legal, or health advice specific to your circumstances.