Last updated 4 days ago. Our resources are updated regularly but please keep in mind that links, programs, policies, and contact information do change.
Finding trustworthy health information shouldn’t feel like searching for a needle in a haystack. Yet with misinformation spreading faster than wildfire, knowing where to find reliable health data has never been more important.
The U.S. government collects and shares an enormous amount of health data through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. This isn’t bureaucratic paperwork—it’s the foundation that guides everything from local outbreak responses to national health policies.
At the center of this system sits the National Center for Health Statistics, America’s principal health statistics agency. To make this data accessible to everyone, the CDC created CDC WONDER, a free online tool that puts powerful health statistics at your fingertips.
This guide explains what these resources are, why you can trust them, and how to use them to answer your most pressing health questions.
Why Federal Health Statistics Matter
The Challenge of Scattered Data
Public health authority in America is largely decentralized. States and local governments hold most of the power, which means the CDC relies almost entirely on voluntary reporting from a vast network of hospitals, laboratories, doctors’ offices, clinics, and other healthcare providers.
Each source operates under different state and local laws that define what data must be reported, how it should be formatted, and how it can be used. This creates a patchwork system where data often arrives in different formats, and the types of information reported can vary dramatically from one state to the next.
Much of this data still travels through manual processes—phone calls, mail, and faxes. These outdated methods create administrative backlogs, introduce human errors, and critically slow down analysis. When data arrives slowly or incompletely, public health officials struggle to assemble a clear picture of emerging threats.
The Push for Better Systems
The federal government is working to modernize this infrastructure, and it’s more than just a technology upgrade—it’s a national security imperative. COVID-19 exposed serious gaps in our ability to report timely, accurate data.
A modernized system would provide real-time answers to critical questions during emergencies: Where are cases occurring? How many hospital beds are available? Are there outbreaks in nursing homes? Are certain groups being disproportionately affected? Are vaccines and treatments working?
Better data also helps monitor everyday health problems like workplace injuries, sexually transmitted diseases, and drug overdoses. Improved demographic data collection is essential for identifying and addressing health disparities that affect specific communities.
The government can’t simply command compliance from thousands of independent healthcare providers. Instead, federal agencies use financial incentives to encourage modern data practices. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services offers increased reimbursements to hospitals and physicians that report public health data using certified electronic health records.
These incentives have proven effective in driving wider use of automated electronic case reporting, which reduces the burden on providers and improves the timeliness and quality of data that public health agencies receive.
The Standards That Build Trust
While the collection system is complex and evolving, the statistics ultimately published by federal agencies are considered authoritative because they meet the highest standards of quality, mandated by law and enforced by rigorous scientific principles.
The foundation of this trust is the Information Quality Act, part of Public Law 106-554 passed in 2001. This law requires all federal agencies to issue guidelines for ensuring and maximizing the quality of information they share with the public.
The Department of Health and Human Services and its agencies, including the CDC, have established a comprehensive framework built on three core principles:
Objectivity: Information must be accurate, reliable, and unbiased. Scientific studies are subject to external, objective peer-review processes both at inception and before publication. All statistical activities must be based on reliable data sources and carried out according to modern statistical theory and practice.
Utility: Information must be useful to its intended users, whether they are policymakers, researchers, or the general public. The goal is providing data that can inform action and improve health outcomes.
Integrity: Information must be secure from unauthorized access or revision. This guarantees that data isn’t compromised through corruption or falsification, ensuring the public receives authentic, verified information.
This system includes mechanisms for public accountability. The guidelines aren’t just internal policies—they’re a public commitment. They establish processes that allow any affected person to seek correction of information that doesn’t comply with these standards.
Evidence-Based Decision Making
The ultimate purpose of this vast data system is enabling evidence-based decision making. Just as doctors need reliable data to diagnose and treat patients, public health agencies need reliable data to measure and improve the health of entire communities.
This science-based approach defines public health. Effective policies and activities draw from the best available science and are updated as new information emerges. This data supports decisions at all levels of government and informs the judgments of business leaders, school administrators, medical providers, and individual citizens nationwide.
Reliable health statistics allow us to:
- Assess and monitor population health by tracking community health status, identifying key risk factors, and understanding community needs
- Investigate and address health problems from infectious disease outbreaks to chronic conditions
- Identify and address health inequities using disaggregated data to pinpoint disparities affecting certain groups
- Create and implement effective policies designed to have measurable, positive impacts on public health
When public health works, the result is often the absence of disease and longer, healthier lives in communities. This is made possible by a foundation of reliable, objective, and accessible data.
The National Center for Health Statistics
The National Center for Health Statistics serves as America’s principal health statistics agency. Established in 1960 by merging the National Office of Vital Statistics and the National Health Survey, it brought together the nation’s primary systems for tracking life, death, and health status under one roof.
Finding the Right NCHS
A quick internet search for “NCHS” often leads to confusion, as results frequently include websites of various high schools like North Caroline High School or New Caney High School. To avoid this common pitfall, always search for the full name “National Center for Health Statistics” or navigate directly to the official website.
How NCHS Gathers Data
The NCHS doesn’t rely on a single method to gather information. Instead, it employs four main data collection programs that work together like a comprehensive diagnostic toolkit for the nation’s health. Each provides a unique and essential perspective.
These programs aren’t redundant—they’re complementary. Together they create a robust picture of American health. Understanding this system helps you select the right tool for specific questions. To understand self-reported smoking rates, the National Health Interview Survey is best. To measure the actual impact of smoking on lung function through physical tests, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey is superior. To find the official count of deaths caused by lung cancer, the National Vital Statistics System is the definitive authority.
The National Vital Statistics System
The National Vital Statistics System is the oldest and most successful example of inter-governmental data sharing in American public health. It functions as a complete census of all vital events registered in the United States, including births, deaths, fetal deaths, marriages, and divorces.
The NCHS collaborates with vital registration offices in all 50 states, New York City, the District of Columbia, and all U.S. territories to compile information from official certificates filed for each event.
For births, the system collects demographic information on parents, details on prenatal care, the baby’s birth weight, and any medical risk factors associated with the pregnancy. For deaths, it captures demographic information about the deceased and, most critically, the cause of death, which is medically certified by a physician, coroner, or medical examiner.
The system provides the most fundamental and complete data on health and demographic trends of the U.S. population. It’s the source for official statistics on fertility rates, infant mortality, life expectancy, and leading causes of death. Because it’s a census of all events, its data can be analyzed for small geographic areas like counties over very long periods, providing unparalleled historical and local detail.
The National Health Interview Survey
The National Health Interview Survey is the nation’s largest and oldest in-person household health survey, providing continuous data since 1957. Each year, U.S. Census Bureau interviewers visit thousands of households to conduct interviews with a nationally representative sample of the civilian, non-institutionalized population.
The survey captures the nation’s health from people’s own perspectives. Through detailed personal interviews, it collects data on diagnosed illnesses and injuries, chronic health conditions, health insurance coverage, access to and use of healthcare services, and health-related behaviors like smoking, alcohol consumption, and physical activity.
As the principal source of information on the health of the U.S. population, the survey allows researchers and policymakers to monitor trends in health status, behaviors, and healthcare access over time. Its large sample size and rich demographic data make it possible to analyze how health differs across various socioeconomic groups.
The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey is unique among all national health surveys. It combines in-depth, in-home interviews with comprehensive physical examinations and laboratory tests conducted in specially designed mobile examination centers.
The interview portion gathers information on diet, health history, and health behaviors. The examination portion collects objective, clinical data. Trained medical personnel directly measure participants’ blood pressure, cholesterol levels, body mass index, lung function, and dental health. Laboratory tests on blood and urine samples can measure nutritional status and exposure to environmental chemicals.
This unique design allows the survey to uncover the true prevalence of health conditions by identifying undiagnosed cases. A person might not report having high blood pressure because they’re unaware of it, but the physical exam can measure it directly. This provides a far more accurate picture of the nation’s health than interviews alone.
Survey data has driven major public health policies, such as the removal of lead from gasoline, and it’s the source for fundamental clinical tools like the pediatric growth charts used in doctors’ offices worldwide.
The National Health Care Surveys
While other programs focus on individuals and households, the National Health Care Surveys gather data from healthcare providers. This family of surveys collects data directly from hospitals, emergency departments, ambulatory surgery centers, outpatient offices, and long-term care facilities.
These surveys provide detailed information on care and services delivered, characteristics of patients being served, and operational aspects of healthcare, such as adoption and use of electronic health records and other health information technologies.
This provider-level data is essential for understanding the structure and function of the U.S. healthcare system. It complements patient-focused data by providing critical information on healthcare delivery patterns, resource utilization, and the real-world impact of health policies on providers.
Privacy Protection
The structure of these data systems reveals a constant balancing act between providing detailed information and protecting participant privacy. The NCHS distinguishes between public-use data files, which are widely available, and restricted-use data files.
In public-use files, information that could potentially identify an individual—such as specific geographic location or date of birth—is removed or aggregated into broader categories. This process ensures participant confidentiality.
For researchers who require more granular data, the NCHS provides access to restricted-use files through its Research Data Center. Accessing these files involves a rigorous application process where researchers must justify their need for the data, demonstrate a clear research plan, and agree to strict confidentiality protocols.
This carefully controlled access isn’t merely bureaucratic—it’s the mechanism that allows the NCHS to collect detailed and sensitive information in the first place. By guaranteeing confidentiality through robust protections, the NCHS can build the trust necessary for individuals and organizations to participate in its surveys.
CDC WONDER: Your Gateway to Health Data
While the National Center for Health Statistics produces the nation’s health data, CDC WONDER serves as the public’s primary gateway for exploring it. WONDER stands for Wide-ranging ONline Data for Epidemiologic Research—a free, public, menu-driven online system designed to make the CDC’s vast data resources accessible to everyone.
Its core purpose is promoting information-driven decision-making by placing timely, useful facts directly into the hands of public health professionals, researchers, journalists, students, and any interested member of the public.
The Connection Between NCHS and WONDER
The relationship between NCHS and CDC WONDER is one of producer and distributor. NCHS, through its comprehensive surveys and systems, is the primary producer of many foundational datasets on American health. CDC WONDER serves as a powerful query tool that transforms these massive, complex data files into an interactive, user-friendly resource.
Many of the most powerful and frequently used datasets available in WONDER, particularly detailed data on births and deaths, are provided directly by the NCHS.
Before tools like WONDER, analyzing these large-scale NCHS datasets required significant technical expertise, expensive statistical software, and often access to restricted data environments. WONDER’s intuitive, fill-in-the-blanks web interface effectively democratizes epidemiological research. It puts the power of data analysis into the hands of any citizen with an internet connection.
Key WONDER Databases
CDC WONDER hosts a wide array of public health databases. Some of the most critical for answering common health questions include:
Mortality Data (Underlying Cause of Death): This is arguably the most powerful tool within WONDER. It allows users to query the complete NCHS mortality dataset derived from all U.S. death certificates. Users can find the number of deaths and death rates broken down by specific cause of death, geographic location, age, race, Hispanic origin, sex, and more.
Cancer Statistics: This database provides access to the United States Cancer Statistics, the official federal statistics on cancer. The data, produced jointly by the NCHS and the National Cancer Institute, allows users to explore cancer incidence and cancer mortality by cancer site, location, and demographic characteristics.
Births (Natality): Using data from the National Vital Statistics System, this tool allows users to query information on all registered births in the U.S. It’s possible to explore trends in birth rates, maternal age, prenatal care initiation, birth weight, and other key indicators of maternal and infant health.
Other Notable Databases: WONDER also provides access to data on sexually transmitted disease morbidity, various environmental health metrics like air quality and heat index data, and official population estimates from the Census Bureau, which are crucial for calculating rates.
Using WONDER: A Step-by-Step Guide
The best way to understand WONDER’s power is to use it. The structure of the query form itself teaches users the fundamentals of sound statistical thinking. By guiding users through defining groups, setting filters, and selecting measures, the tool implicitly teaches how to construct a valid research question.
Let’s walk through a common research question: “What were the top 5 leading causes of death for men ages 45-54 in Pennsylvania in 2021?”
Navigate to the Correct Database
Begin by going to the CDC WONDER homepage. Under the “Deaths” topic heading, click on the link for Underlying Cause of Death. This will take you to a page with several mortality datasets. For the most recent data, select the dataset for “2018-2023: Underlying Cause of Death by Single-Race Categories” by clicking the “Data Request” button. You’ll be asked to agree to the data use restrictions before proceeding.
The Request Form: Grouping Your Results
The request form is where you build your query. The first section, “Organize table layout,” asks how to group your results. To get a ranked list of causes, group the results by the cause of death itself.
In the “Group Results by” dropdown menu, select ICD-10 113 Selected Causes of Death. This uses a standardized list of the most common causes of death, making results easier to read than using thousands of individual ICD-10 codes.
Setting Your Filters
Now use the subsequent sections to narrow your query to the specific population of interest.
Select Location: In the location list, scroll down and select Pennsylvania.
Select Demographics: Under “Age,” click on the Ten-Year Age Groups radio button. In the list that appears, select 45-54 years. Under “Gender,” select Male.
Select Year and Month: In the “Year” list, select 2021 or the most recent full year available.
For other sections like Weekday, Autopsy, and Place of Death, you can leave the default “All” selections for this query.
Interpreting the Results
At the bottom of the page, click the blue Send button. WONDER will process your request and return a results table.
The table will list the causes of death that match your criteria. The key columns are Deaths (the raw number of deaths) and Crude Rate (the number of deaths per 100,000 population).
To find the top 5 leading causes, click on the column header labeled Deaths. This will sort the table in descending order, bringing the causes with the highest death counts to the top.
Understanding the Details
Scroll to the bottom of the results page. Here you’ll find crucial context for your data:
- Suggested Citation: WONDER provides the exact citation you should use if you reference this data in a report or presentation
- Query Criteria: The system lists all the selections you made, allowing you to verify your query and share it with others
- Notes and Caveats: This section provides important information about the data, such as definitions and limitations
For those who need to integrate this data into other applications, WONDER also provides an Application Programming Interface. This advanced feature allows developers to write code that can automatically query the WONDER databases and pull results into custom dashboards, research models, or other software.
Finding Answers to Common Health Questions
The true power of the NCHS and CDC WONDER lies in their ability to provide concrete answers to real-world health questions. However, a common challenge is the “translation gap”: people often have personal, symptom-based questions (“Why do I have headaches?”), while the government provides population-level, statistical data (“What is the prevalence of migraines?”).
A key skill is learning to translate personal curiosity into researchable, population-level questions. For example, “Why do I have headaches?” can become “How common are headaches in people of my age and sex? Are they becoming more or less common? What are the known risk factors?”
Essential Terms
Understanding a few basic statistical terms is essential for interpreting health data correctly:
Mortality Rate: The number of deaths occurring in a specific population during a defined period, usually expressed as “deaths per 100,000 people per year” to allow comparisons between groups of different sizes.
Prevalence: The proportion of a population that has a specific disease or condition at a single point in time. It’s a snapshot of how widespread a condition is. For example: “In 2022, the prevalence of diagnosed diabetes among U.S. adults was 11.6%.”
Incidence: The rate at which new cases of a disease occur in a population over a specific period. It tells you how quickly a disease is spreading. For example: “The incidence of flu was 500 new cases per 100,000 people last week.”
Age-Adjusted Rate: A statistical technique used to make fair comparisons of health outcomes between two populations with different age structures. For example, Florida has a much older population than Utah. A simple comparison of their raw death rates would be misleading because older people have a higher risk of death. Age-adjustment statistically modifies the data to show what the rates would be if both states had the same age distribution.
Matching Questions to Data Sources
Here’s a guide to help you find answers to common health questions using the best NCHS and WONDER resources:
“What are the leading causes of death in the U.S. or my state?” Best Source: CDC WONDER (Underlying Cause of Death) Why: This tool uses official death certificate data, which is a complete census of all deaths. It allows precise ranking of causes by specific age group, sex, race, and geographic location.
“How many people really have high blood pressure or high cholesterol, including those who don’t know it?” Best Source: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Why: This is the only national survey that combines interviews with physical exams and lab tests. This allows it to measure conditions like hypertension and high cholesterol directly, capturing both diagnosed and undiagnosed cases.
“Are people in my state more or less likely to smoke or be physically inactive than the national average?” Best Source: National Health Interview Survey Why: This is the nation’s largest household health survey and the best source for data on self-reported health behaviors. Its large, representative sample allows for robust comparisons between different demographic groups.
“What are the trends in teen births or C-section rates?” Best Source: National Vital Statistics System (Natality Data), which can be accessed through NCHS reports or queried directly in CDC WONDER Why: Because this system is a complete census of all registered births in the U.S., it’s the most accurate and comprehensive source for tracking trends in birth characteristics and maternal and infant health indicators.
“How many people in the U.S. lack health insurance?” Best Source: National Health Interview Survey Why: This is the primary federal survey for tracking health insurance coverage over time. Through direct household interviews, it gathers detailed information on who has insurance, the type of coverage they have, and barriers to accessing care.
“Is a certain type of cancer more common in my community?” Best Source: CDC WONDER (Cancer Statistics) Why: This database contains cancer incidence data from high-quality state-level cancer registries. It allows users to explore cancer rates by geographic area and demographic group, helping to identify potential local trends.
Your Health Data Roadmap
| Your Question Is About… | The Best Data Source Is… | Why? |
|---|---|---|
| Causes of Death, Mortality Rates | CDC WONDER (Underlying Cause of Death) | Allows detailed queries by age, sex, race, location, and specific cause. Based on official death certificates. |
| How many people actually have a disease (including those who don’t know it) | NHANES | Combines interviews with physical exams and lab tests to find both diagnosed and undiagnosed cases, giving true prevalence. |
| Health behaviors (smoking, exercise, alcohol use) or access to healthcare | NHIS | A large, annual survey that asks a representative sample of people directly about their habits, insurance, and healthcare experiences. |
| Birth trends (birth rates by age, C-sections, prenatal care) | NVSS (Natality Data) / CDC WONDER | A complete census of all registered births in the U.S., providing the most comprehensive demographic and medical data. |
| Health Insurance Coverage Trends | NHIS | The primary source for tracking trends in who has insurance, what type, and barriers to care through direct household interviews. |
Real-World Impact
Abstract numbers and statistical rates can be difficult to grasp. These real-world examples demonstrate the profound impact that NCHS data has had on the health and safety of every American, providing a powerful antidote to health misinformation by grounding public discourse in verifiable facts.
The Fight Against Lead Poisoning
In the 1970s, the United States faced a hidden public health crisis. While lead was known to be toxic, its widespread presence in gasoline and paint was considered normal. It was data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey that provided the first clear, national-level evidence that Americans, particularly children, had dangerously high levels of lead in their blood.
Even low levels of lead exposure can cause serious and permanent health problems, including developmental delays and learning disabilities. Armed with this undeniable scientific evidence, Congress, the Environmental Protection Agency, and other federal agencies took decisive action to phase out lead from gasoline and paint.
The results were a stunning public health victory. By the 1990s, the proportion of Americans with elevated blood lead levels had plummeted. The data didn’t just identify a problem—it catalyzed a policy change that has protected the health of generations of children.
Creating the Pediatric Growth Chart
The familiar growth charts that hang on the walls of pediatricians’ offices across the country and around the world are a direct product of NCHS data. These essential clinical tools, used to track a child’s physical development and identify potential health issues early, were developed using body measurement data—height, weight, and head circumference—collected from thousands of children who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
These charts provide the standard against which every child’s growth is measured. Without the detailed, nationally representative data, doctors would lack this fundamental tool for monitoring child health.
Tracking the Opioid Epidemic
The National Vital Statistics System mortality data, made readily accessible through CDC WONDER, has been the nation’s primary tool for monitoring the devastating trajectory of the drug overdose epidemic. By providing timely, detailed, and geographically specific data on deaths involving opioids and other substances, the system allows public health officials and policymakers to see where the crisis is hitting hardest, which specific drugs are driving the death toll, and which demographic groups are most at risk.
This data is indispensable for targeting life-saving interventions like the distribution of naloxone, funding for treatment programs, and public health warnings about new threats like illicitly manufactured fententyl. The numbers found in WONDER aren’t just statistics—they’re a call to action that guides the national response to one of the most pressing public health crises of our time.
The ability to filter data by race, ethnicity, income, and geography isn’t just a technical feature—it’s the primary tool for identifying and addressing health disparities. By using these demographic filters, any user can investigate issues of fairness and justice in health outcomes, making these tools essential for promoting health equity across all communities.
Our articles make government information more accessible. Please consult a qualified professional for financial, legal, or health advice specific to your circumstances.