Last updated 5 days ago. Our resources are updated regularly but please keep in mind that links, programs, policies, and contact information do change.
You can see what stocks your representatives buy and sell but it’s not as simple as it should be.
The Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act of 2012 requires members of Congress to disclose their stock trades. But the system is full of loopholes, delays, and weak enforcement.
The data exists, but it’s scattered across confusing government websites and buried in PDF files. Meanwhile, a growing industry of apps and websites has sprung up to track congressional trades, with some investors even trying to copy what politicians buy and sell.
What the STOCK Act Requires
The STOCK Act, signed into law in 2012, made two things clear: members of Congress aren’t exempt from insider trading laws, and they have to report their stock trades publicly.
Here’s what the law says:
The 45-Day Delay: Members must disclose trades within 45 days of making them. That means by the time you see the trade, it’s already six weeks old.
The $1,000 Threshold: Any stock, bond, or commodity trade over $1,000 must be reported.
This 45-day window is a major problem. In today’s markets, information moves in seconds. By the time a trade becomes public, the market conditions that led to it are long gone. You’re seeing history, not real-time activity.
The 2013 Weakening
The original STOCK Act was actually stronger. In 2013, Congress quietly passed an amendment that removed the requirement for an easy-to-search online database of congressional staff trades. The vote happened without debate and wasn’t even recorded.
This means thousands of senior staffers who have access to the same information as members of Congress no longer have to disclose their trades in an accessible way.
How to Find the Data
If you want to look up your representative’s trades, here’s where to go.
House of Representatives
The House Clerk maintains the official database.
Website: disclosures-clerk.house.gov
How to search: You can search by a member’s last name and year. So if you want to see Nancy Pelosi’s 2025 trades, you’d type “Pelosi” and “2025.”
The problem: You can’t search by stock ticker. Want to know which representatives bought NVIDIA? You can’t just type “NVIDIA” and find out. You have to search each member individually or use a third-party site.
File formats: Many reports are scanned PDFs, making them hard to analyze.
The Senate
The Senate has its own system.
Website: efdsearch.senate.gov
What’s included: Senators and former senators (for six years after they leave office).
Similar problems: Like the House site, you can only search by senator name, not by stock.
Physical Archives
Believe it or not, the most complete records are still kept on paper. The Legislative Resource Center in the Cannon House Office Building and the Senate Office of Public Records maintain physical files you can look at in person. This creates an obvious barrier for most people who just want to check what their representative is trading.
Weak Enforcement
The penalty for filing a trade disclosure late? A $200 fine.
For a member of Congress trading tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars in stocks, $200 is nothing. It’s basically a parking ticket. And these fines are often waived if the member claims it was an accident or a clerical error.
In 2025, numerous members filed disclosures months late, and almost all got away with just apologizing or paying the small fine.
The Private Industry Tracking Congress
Because the government data is so hard to use, private companies have built a booming business tracking congressional trades.
Quiver Quantitative
Quiver Quantitative has become one of the most popular sites for tracking what Congress buys and sells.
What they do: They use software to scan government PDFs and convert them into searchable data. They track who’s buying what, how their portfolios perform, and which committees are trading in the industries they regulate.
Cost: Basic access is free. Advanced features cost $10 to $75 per month.
Why it matters: Quiver tracks performance. Their data shows that members of Congress often beat the stock market average—a phenomenon some call “Congressional Alpha.”
Capitol Trades
Capitol Trades focuses on making the data easy to understand.
Features: They create “heatmaps” showing which sectors different committees are buying. For example, you can see if the Energy Committee is suddenly buying oil stocks.
Cost: Much of the site is free.
Autopilot App
The most controversial development is the Autopilot app, which lets users automatically copy politicians’ trades.
How it works: You connect your brokerage account to the app. You pick a “pilot” (like Nancy Pelosi or a famous investor). The app automatically buys and sells to match their portfolio.
The catch: Remember that 45-day delay? By the time Autopilot executes a trade, the politician made it six weeks ago. You’re buying what they bought 45 days late, which can be a big problem in volatile markets.
Cultural meaning: Despite the obvious flaw, the app’s popularity shows how cynical Americans have become. Rather than demanding Congress stop trading on inside information, many people have decided to just “join them.”
Stock-Tracking ETFs
In what might be the peak of this trend, there are now exchange-traded funds that track congressional trades.
NANC: Tracks Democratic members’ trades. Heavy on tech stocks like Apple and Microsoft.
KRUZ: Tracks Republican members’ trades. Heavy on energy and defense stocks.
These funds reportedly outperform the overall market. Their very existence is an embarrassment to Congress—they’re proof that lawmakers’ portfolios beat the average investor.
Recent Scandals
The push for reform has been driven by specific examples of questionable trades in 2024-2025.
The Tariff Trades
In February 2025, President Trump announced new tariff plans. In the 55 days after that announcement, over 50 members of Congress made more than 2,000 trades involving about 700 companies affected by the tariffs.
This raised obvious questions: Were they reacting to public news with suspicious speed? Or were they acting on private briefings the public didn’t get?
The Hospital Bond Sale
In March 2025, Rep. Rob Bresnahan Jr. (R-PA) sold hundreds of thousands of dollars in hospital bonds—just one month after voting to cut Medicaid funding that would hurt those same hospitals.
Critics said it looked like he was protecting his own money from the consequences of his own vote.
Defense and Tech Trades
Members of the Armed Services Committee continue to trade defense contractor stocks like Lockheed Martin while voting on defense budgets. Members of the Judiciary Committee who regulate Big Tech remain heavily invested in companies like Apple, Amazon, and Google.
The Push to Ban Trading
Faced with these scandals, Congress is now considering bills that would ban stock trading entirely.
H.R. 5106: Restore Trust in Congress Act
This House bill, introduced by Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) and Rep. Seth Magaziner (D-RI), has support from both the far-right Freedom Caucus and the Progressive Caucus.
What it does: Bans members, their spouses, and their children from trading individual stocks.
What’s allowed: They could still own diversified mutual funds and ETFs. U.S. Treasury bonds would also be okay.
The requirement: Members would have to either sell their stocks or put them in a “blind trust” where they don’t control the trades.
Status: As of November 2025, the bill has nearly 100 co-sponsors but hasn’t gotten a vote.
The ETHICS Act (Senate Version)
The Senate version is led by Senators Jeff Merkley (D-OR) and Josh Hawley (R-MO).
Stronger penalties: Instead of a $200 fine, violations would cost either a month’s salary or 10% of the asset value—whichever is more.
Bipartisan support: Like the House bill, it has support from both parties.
The November 2025 Hearing
On November 19-20, 2025, the House Administration Committee held a hearing titled “Taking Stock of the STOCK Act”.
Reformers saw it as a delay tactic to avoid actually voting on the ban. Witnesses debated whether a total ban would prevent successful business people from running for Congress, or whether it was necessary to restore public trust.
The Tax Deferral Controversy
One controversial part of the proposed ban is a tax break for members who have to sell their stocks.
How It Would Work
Under current law, executive branch officials who are forced to sell assets to avoid conflicts of interest can get a Certificate of Divestiture.
Here’s the deal: If you have to sell stock that’s gone up a lot in value, you normally owe capital gains tax right away. With a Certificate of Divestiture, you can reinvest the money in something like Treasury bonds and delay paying the tax until you eventually sell those.
Why Include It?
Supporters say it’s fair. If someone bought Apple stock 30 years ago, forcing them to sell it now could trigger a massive tax bill. Without this provision, wealthy people might refuse to serve in Congress rather than face that tax hit.
Why It’s Controversial
Critics call it “a special tax break for politicians”. Regular Americans can’t defer taxes when they rebalance their portfolios. Why should members of Congress get this perk?
Some argue that if the stock gains came from insider trading in the first place, letting members avoid taxes on those gains adds insult to injury.
Public Opinion vs. Political Reality
The disconnect between what voters want and what Congress does is massive.
86% Support a Ban
Polling shows 86% of Americans support banning congressional stock trading. This includes 87% of Republicans and 88% of Democrats.
In swing states like Arizona, Georgia, and Pennsylvania, support exceeds 70%.
Congressional Resistance
Despite overwhelming public support, many members resist.
Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) has been the most vocal opponent, arguing “It’s a free country” and that banning trades would keep successful business people from running for office.
Congressional leadership has expressed openness to the idea but keeps delaying actual votes by calling for more hearings and studies.
What Happens If Trading Gets Banned?
If a ban passes, several things would change:
The tracking industry dies: Apps like Autopilot and ETFs like NANC would lose their purpose. If members can only own boring mutual funds, there’s nothing interesting to track.
Corruption might shift: Some experts warn that if stock trading is banned, corruption could move to less transparent areas like real estate deals or private equity investments that are harder to track.
Better trust? Supporters hope a ban would restore some faith in government. Critics worry it would just make the corruption harder to see.
Current State of the Law
| Feature | H.R. 5106 (House Bill) | ETHICS Act (Senate) | Current STOCK Act |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trading Ban | Yes | Yes | No, just disclosure |
| Who’s Covered | Member, spouse, kids | Member, spouse, kids | Member, senior staff |
| Must Sell Stocks? | Yes, or use blind trust | Yes, or use blind trust | No |
| Penalty | Civil fines | 10% of value or month’s salary | $200 (often waived) |
| Tax Break | Yes | Yes | Not applicable |
| What’s Still Allowed | Diversified funds, Treasuries | Diversified funds, Treasuries | Everything |
Bottom Line
Yes, you can technically see your congressperson’s stock trades. But the system is designed to make it difficult. The 45-day delay means the information is always outdated. The government websites are hard to use. And the penalties for breaking the rules are a joke.
Private companies have stepped in to make the data more accessible, and some Americans have given up on reform entirely—they’re just trying to copy what their representatives buy.
Congress is now debating whether to ban trading altogether. With 86% public support, you’d think it would be an easy vote. But as of late 2025, leadership keeps stalling. The trades continue, the tracking apps flourish, and the gap between what Americans want and what Congress does keeps growing—one stock trade at a time.
Our articles make government information more accessible. Please consult a qualified professional for financial, legal, or health advice specific to your circumstances.