Federal Workers in Shutdown Limbo: What Happens to Pay and Benefits

Last updated 2 hours ago. Our resources are updated regularly but please keep in mind that links, programs, policies, and contact information do change.

Approximately 260,000 Department of Homeland Security workers are either on the job without pay or sitting at home without pay. The first full missed paychecks will land in mid-March, right as spring break travel hits its peak. The shutdown began at 12:01 a.m. On February 14. The calendar is not waiting for negotiations to resume.

The political dispute is real and truly complicated. (We will get to it.) But the more urgent story is the financial mechanics: exactly when paychecks stop, which benefits start to wobble, and what legal options exist for workers facing a cash-flow crisis. The usual reassurance about back pay is, for many families, cold comfort when rent is due March 1.

When the First Paycheck Goes Missing

The federal government runs on a biweekly pay schedule, with period-end dates that vary by agency — falling on dates such as Feb. 7, Feb. 21, March 7, and March 21 under the GSA’s 2026 payroll calendar. The shutdown began February 14, which means the first full pay period without funding runs from roughly February 15 through February 28.

Under the 2026 federal payroll calendar, the resulting payday falls somewhere in the range of March 4 to March 20. That range depends on the particular agency payroll system.

For a TSA screener earning around $70,000 annually, that is roughly $2,700 per missed biweekly paycheck. For a Coast Guard petty officer at the higher end of the enlisted pay scale, closer to $3,850. Two missed paychecks and you are looking at a month’s rent in most American cities, gone.

The timing is especially brutal because it lines up with the start of spring break travel season. Reports suggest 2026 is on track to be one of the busiest air travel years on record, with spring break being the first major peak of the year. The most congested weeks typically run mid-March through early April. So the moment TSA screeners face their worst financial stress is also the moment they are handling the highest passenger volumes of the year. That is not a coincidence that fixes itself.

During the 43-day government shutdown that ran from October 1 through November 12, 2025, reports from that period documented rising unscheduled absences among TSA screeners at major hubs; at least one checkpoint closure was confirmed in Philadelphia. The 2018-2019 shutdown produced similar patterns, with TSA reporting increased absenteeism and longer security lines at multiple major airports, though the Philadelphia checkpoint closure is linked to the 2025 shutdown, not that earlier period.

As financial pressure builds, unscheduled absences increase, checkpoints get understaffed, wait times balloon, and flights get delayed or cancelled.

Acting TSA Administrator Ha Nguyen McNeill told lawmakers that during a shutdown, “the ability to pay for rent, bills, groceries, child care, and gas to get to work becomes challenging, leading to increased unscheduled absences as a shutdown progresses.” Before the shutdown began, Airlines for America, U.S. Travel, and the American Hotel and Lodging Association warned jointly that “travelers and the U.S. Economy cannot afford to have TSA screeners working without pay, which increases the risk of unscheduled absences and call outs, and ultimately can lead to higher wait times and missed or delayed flights.”

The Back Pay Guarantee: Real, But Not Enough

Here is the part that confuses people: federal workers are legally guaranteed to receive back pay for work performed during a shutdown. The 2019 Government Employee Fair Treatment Act (GEFTA) put this into law, stating that excepted employees “shall be paid for such work, at the employee’s standard rate of pay, at the earliest date possible after the lapse in appropriations ends, regardless of scheduled pay dates.” The National Treasury Employees Union has a useful breakdown of how this works in practice.

But GEFTA’s guarantee only applies going forward. It promises payment after the shutdown ends, not during it. A TSA screener working in mid-March is promised back payment in April or May. That promise does not make March rent go away. It does not cover the overdraft fee when the automatic mortgage payment hits an empty account. It does not stop a childcare provider from dropping a family that misses two consecutive payments.

There is also a legal contradiction worth naming. The Anti-Deficiency Act, enacted in 1884, generally bars federal agencies from creating obligations without appropriated funds. Technically, excepted employees should not be working without pay. Congress and past administrations have treated excepted work during shutdowns as a temporary exception to this rule, with back pay as the fix.

But the law’s existence means workers are stuck in a kind of legal gray zone: required to work, not allowed to be paid, and promised future compensation. They must show up, can’t legally be paid yet, and have to cover their own bills in the meantime. They are left to manage the gap themselves.

For a deeper look at which DHS employees are classified as excepted versus furloughed, and who makes those decisions, see our earlier coverage of when DHS shuts down and who decides which employees keep working.

The Cascading Timeline of What Workers Lose

The financial impacts of a shutdown do not all hit at once. They build week by week, which is why the second and third weeks of a shutdown are often more damaging than the first. The federal payroll processing schedule governs exactly when these gaps occur.

Week one: most workers have already received a partial paycheck covering the days before the shutdown began. The financial hit is real but partial. Savings can cover the gap. This is the time when workers should be making calls, not waiting.

Week two (around February 21-28): workers are still on the job or furloughed as before. But the automatic deductions that pay their share of Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) premiums have stopped. Coverage technically continues during a shutdown. OPM regulations allow workers to repay built-up premiums through payroll withholding after the shutdown ends. But the grace period for missed premiums is not unlimited. Workers should check current OPM guidance on their specific plan rather than assuming coverage is protected indefinitely.

Early March: the first full missed paycheck hits. This is the moment the financial crisis becomes real rather than theoretical. Rent, mortgage, utilities, childcare: all of these are due on normal schedules that do not pause for political negotiations.

Late March, if the shutdown extends: longer-term benefits risks emerge. Federal workers contribute to the Thrift Savings Plan, a 401(k)-style retirement account. During a shutdown, both worker contributions and agency matching contributions typically stop for furloughed staff. For excepted employees, agency matching may also be suspended depending on agency policy. Federal life insurance coverage faces the same risk if premiums go unpaid past the allowed window.

Each week adds another layer of financial damage that back pay, when it finally arrives, may not fully repair. A worker who takes on high-interest credit card debt to cover March expenses will still be paying that interest in June, after the back pay arrives. The shutdown’s financial cost to workers is always larger than the missed paychecks alone.

What Workers Can Do Right Now

The options are imperfect, and several have eligibility limits that workers should understand before assuming they qualify.

The Federal Employee Education and Assistance Fund (FEEA) is a nonprofit that has provided emergency loans with no fees and no interest to federal employees since 1986. It has issued over 11,000 loans for personal emergencies. The key caveat: FEEA loans are designed for qualifying emergencies (medical crises, deaths in the family, house fires), not routine income replacement. Being furloughed or working without pay during a shutdown does not automatically qualify. Workers should contact FEEA directly to find out whether their specific circumstances meet the eligibility criteria. Do not assume the fund is a general shutdown safety net.

Union hardship programs are more directly aimed at shutdown situations. The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) and the National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU) have established hardship assistance programs specifically for these circumstances. Union Plus, which provides benefits to union members, offers furlough grants up to $1,000 for eligible members. It also offers mortgage assistance with interest-free loans covering up to six months of payments, plus an additional $1,000 grant and hardship grants in other categories. Union Plus has a dedicated furlough assistance page with current eligibility requirements. The catch: some programs require a minimum membership period before a worker becomes eligible. Workers who joined their union recently may not qualify for all benefits.

State unemployment insurance is available for furloughed federal employees through a federal program called Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE). Each state runs its own version of this program for federal workers. Here is the troubling part: excepted employees who are working without pay typically do not qualify as “unemployed” for unemployment insurance purposes. A furloughed TSA screener sitting at home can potentially receive state unemployment benefits. An excepted screener working 40 hours a week without pay generally cannot. The government requires the work. The unemployment system does not recognize the hardship. That is clearly unfair, and it is worth saying so.

Federal credit unions and commercial banks announced emergency loan programs and fee waivers during the 2018-2019 shutdown. These included payroll advances, no-interest or low-interest emergency loans, overdraft fee waivers, and payment deadline extensions on mortgages. Whether similar programs will be offered this time depends on how long the shutdown runs and individual institution policies. Federal employees with credit union membership should call their institution now, not after the missed paycheck arrives.

Furloughed employees are generally allowed to seek outside employment during the furlough period, though this remains subject to significant ethics restrictions, including conflict-of-interest laws, prohibitions on representing clients before the federal government, and agency-specific supplemental rules. They are not working for the federal government, but taking another job does not automatically violate rules that bar federal employees from work that competes with or compromises their government job. Excepted employees face a different situation: they are still employed by the federal government and may be subject to outside employment restrictions depending on their agency. And practically speaking, working a full-time excepted federal job while taking on additional employment is a difficult ask.

No single program solves the problem: the support system for federal workers during shutdowns is a patchwork. FEEA funds can run dry under high demand, union programs require prior membership, state unemployment excludes excepted employees, and getting lenders to pause or delay payments requires calling each one individually. Anyone waiting for a broad solution will wait too long. The practical advice is to make multiple calls at once, starting this week.

The Constitutional Dispute Over Warrants That Makes Compromise Structurally Hard

The shutdown’s backstory is well-known. Senate Democrats, led by Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, are demanding reforms to Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations. These include a requirement that agents obtain judicial warrants before entering private residences. The Trump administration has dismissed these demands, with White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt calling the latest Democratic proposal “unserious.”

But the reason this shutdown is harder to resolve than a typical funding dispute is that the core disagreement is constitutional, not merely political. In May 2025, DHS issued a memo saying agents could forcibly enter homes using agency-issued warrants when someone had already been ordered deported by an immigration judge. This reversed decades of prior policy.

An administrative warrant is issued by the agency itself. A judicial warrant is issued by a neutral judge or magistrate. That difference is not just procedural: it is the entire point of the Fourth Amendment.

The Supreme Court held in Payton v. New York (1980) that law enforcement cannot enter a home to make a routine arrest without a judicial warrant. An exception applies only when there is an emergency, such as someone fleeing or evidence being destroyed. The opinion specifically stated that “the physical entry of the home is the chief evil against which the wording of the Fourth Amendment is directed.” The Cato Institute’s Ilya Somin has written that for those who interpret the Constitution based on what the Founders originally intended, there is little historical evidence the Founders viewed warrants issued by the executive branch, rather than a judge, as allowed under the Constitution. The Fourth Amendment was written specifically to prevent the kinds of general warrants British officers had used to enter colonists’ homes — a historical point Somin has invoked, though the specific attribution to him has not been independently verified.

DHS General Counsel Jimmy Percival has defended the policy in a Wall Street Journal opinion piece. He argues that administrative warrants meet the Fourth Amendment standard when an individual has already received a final removal order from an immigration judge. He points to a 1960 Supreme Court case, Abel v. United States, as legal backing — though available evidence does not confirm that Percival specifically cited this case in his public defense of the policy.

The Brennan Center for Justice has listed the legal problems with the DHS memo. It argues that administrative warrants skip the independent judicial review the Constitution requires, meaning no judge signs off. Emmanuel Mauleón at the University of Minnesota has argued that administrative warrants do not give agents the legal right to enter a home under current immigration law.

This matters for the shutdown’s duration because constitutional questions do not split easily. Democrats cannot back down from “judicial warrant required” without giving up what they see as a basic civil liberties protection. The administration cannot accept the warrant requirement without implicitly admitting that its May 2025 memo was unlawful. The underlying question is binary: either a warrant is required or it is not.

For background on how Democrats’ specific demands fit into the broader ICE reform debate, and why their use is structurally weaker than it appears given ICE’s pre-appropriated funding, see our earlier analysis of what immigration enforcement looks like without DHS funding.

Spring Break as Political Pressure: Real but Uncertain

Spring break is supposed to be the moment when pressure builds faster on one side than the other for this shutdown. The logic is simple: if TSA screeners miss their first paychecks around late February while also handling peak travel volumes, absenteeism rises, checkpoints close, and flights get delayed. Millions of families with already-booked vacations then feel the shutdown as a personal financial loss rather than a distant political dispute. Travel industry data suggests the busiest airports this spring are on track for record volumes.

Orlando has surpassed 400,000 booked hotel nights for spring break. Phoenix/Scottsdale sits at 44 percent occupancy. These are not small numbers. The families behind those bookings are clustered in specific places: South Florida, central Florida, Arizona, Texas, California. Members of Congress from travel hub districts face direct pressure from constituents in a way that members from landlocked rural districts do not. The political pain is clustered in specific places.

But here is what makes the deadline less clear than it sounds: the administration has already partly eased the immediate crisis atmosphere that triggered Democratic demands. In the week before the shutdown, the Trump administration withdrew a significant ICE enforcement surge from Minnesota. Minnesota is the state where the fatal shootings of American citizens by federal agents occurred. It was also the political spark for this shutdown.

As immigration analyst Jessica Vaughan of the Center for Immigration Studies observed, “they’ve already recalibrated. I haven’t seen any more flashy operations going in any cities right now.” By pulling back the enforcement operations that drew the most visible controversy, the administration reduced the day-to-day pressure that might otherwise push faster negotiations.

The administration’s counter-argument is also available and convincing to a large portion of voters: Democrats are holding DHS funding hostage to immigration policy demands, and if spring break travelers face long security lines, the blame belongs to the party that refused to fund the government. Whether that argument sticks depends heavily on how news coverage decides who gets the blame during the disruption. That outcome is genuinely unpredictable.

What is not unpredictable: the workers at the center of this will bear the cost regardless of which narrative wins. A TSA screener who takes on credit card debt to cover March rent will not be made whole by back pay alone. The interest builds. The financial disruption grows. The shutdown’s cost to individual workers is always larger than the missed paychecks suggest. That cost is not shared evenly among the people who created it.

The State of the Union Address: Narrative Stakes, No Resolution

President Trump’s State of the Union address on February 24 will happen while the shutdown is ongoing, unless it is resolved in the next few days. That creates an unusual political moment. A president will be giving a constitutionally required address to Congress while a portion of the government he oversees is unfunded and its workers are going without pay. Congress has already passed legislation guaranteeing furloughed federal workers back pay, though the timing of that relief remains uncertain.

The address will not resolve the shutdown, but it will shape the political narrative in ways that affect the pressure to resolve it. If Trump frames the shutdown as Democrats’ choice, stressing their refusal to fund DHS without immigration concessions, he strengthens the Republican argument that Democrats are responsible for the disruption. If Democrats use the occasion to highlight federal worker hardship, they reinforce their own frame. That frame holds that the administration is willing to cause financial pain to working people to protect a legally questionable enforcement policy.

The workers missing paychecks did not choose this dispute and have no power to resolve it. They are, as they always are in shutdowns, the ones who pay the price for a standoff between people who will not miss a paycheck regardless of how long the impasse runs.

The one concrete thing the address might produce: public pressure from constituents watching the speech. These are people who have spring break travel booked and are now paying attention to the shutdown in a way they were not before. That is a different kind of political pressure than the kind generated by advocacy groups or congressional statements — the kind that comes from people who feel directly affected and pick up the phone to call their representative. Whether that pressure is enough to move negotiations before the next missed paycheck cycle is the open question. The next three weeks will answer it.

Our articles make government information more accessible. Please consult a qualified professional for financial, legal, or health advice specific to your circumstances.