Last updated 1 month ago. Our resources are updated regularly but please keep in mind that links, programs, policies, and contact information do change.
- Informed Consent: The Foundation of Patient Rights
- HIPAA: Your Right to Privacy and Access
- Your Right to Refuse Treatment
- Physician Conscience Rights and Limitations
- Emergency Medical Rights Under EMTALA
- End-of-Life Planning and Advance Directives
- Minor Medical Rights
- Disability Rights and Medical Access
- Abortion Rights After Dobbs
- Understanding Your Rights in Practice
The slogan “My Body, My Choice” embodies a core American principle of bodily autonomy backed by decades of law, ethics codes, and court decisions. This principle the interactions you have with the healthcare system, from routine checkups to life-threatening emergencies.
Understanding your medical rights means knowing when you can say yes, when you can say no, and what happens when others make decisions for you. The framework governing these rights has evolved dramatically over the past century, moving from a paternalistic “doctor knows best” model to one centered on patient autonomy and shared decision-making.
Informed Consent: The Foundation of Patient Rights
Informed consent serves as the bedrock of all patient rights in America. This goes far beyond signing a form before surgery. It’s an ongoing conversation between you and your healthcare provider designed to ensure you have all the information needed to make voluntary, well-considered decisions about your care.
The principle gained legal recognition in the landmark 1914 case Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital, where the judge declared that “every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body.”
What Makes Consent Truly “Informed”
For consent to be legally and ethically valid, healthcare providers must cover five essential elements as required by The Joint Commission and medical ethics boards:
- The Nature of the Procedure: Your provider must clearly explain your diagnosis and the specific treatment being recommended.
- Risks and Benefits: You must understand potential risks, complications, side effects, and expected benefits of the recommended treatment.
- Reasonable Alternatives: Providers must discuss all medically appropriate alternatives, including the option of no treatment at all.
- Risks and Benefits of Alternatives: Each alternative must be explained with its associated risks and benefits for true comparison.
- Assessment of Understanding: The provider must confirm you understand the information provided, ensuring your consent represents a truly informed choice rather than just a signature.
This process must happen before any significant medical intervention. You retain the right to withdraw consent at any point during treatment.
When Treatment Can Happen Without Consent
The right to informed consent has specific, narrowly defined exceptions that balance patient autonomy with the provider’s duty to preserve life:
- Life-Threatening Emergencies: When you arrive with a life-threatening condition, are unable to make decisions, and there’s insufficient time to obtain consent from you or a legal surrogate, providers can initiate treatment. The law assumes a reasonable person would consent to life-saving care.
- Patient Incapacitation: If you lack decision-making capacity due to severe mental disability, dementia, or other conditions preventing understanding, a designated surrogate or family member may make decisions on your behalf.
- Voluntary Waiver: You can choose to waive your right to be informed by telling your doctor something like “You’re the expert, do whatever you think is best.” This waiver must be made voluntarily and knowingly.
HIPAA: Your Right to Privacy and Access
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 creates national standards protecting sensitive patient health information. The Office for Civil Rights within the Department of Health and Human Services enforces these protections.
HIPAA often gets misunderstood as a bureaucratic barrier. In reality, it’s a patient-rights law designed to give you control over your most sensitive information. The law doesn’t create a one-way wall locking information away; it creates a gate to which you hold the key.
Understanding HIPAA’s Key Components
Protected Health Information (PHI): Any health information that can be linked to you as an individual, whether on paper, in computers, or spoken aloud. This includes medical history, lab results, billing information, and even the fact that you’re a patient at a particular clinic.
Covered Entities: People and organizations required to comply with HIPAA, including doctors, clinics, hospitals, psychologists, dentists, chiropractors, nursing homes, pharmacies, health insurance companies, and government programs like Medicare and Medicaid.
Business Associates: Outside companies that perform services for covered entities involving PHI handling, such as billing companies, data processing firms, or cloud storage services.
The law consists of two major components: the Privacy Rule, which sets standards for who can access and use your PHI, and the Security Rule, which establishes technical and administrative safeguards for electronic protected health information.
Accessing Your Medical Records
HIPAA guarantees you a legal, enforceable right to see and obtain copies of information in your medical and billing records. This includes doctor’s notes, lab results, medical images, and insurance information.
To request your records, follow these steps:
Check Patient Portals First: Many healthcare systems offer secure online portals for viewing, downloading, and printing health information. Veterans can access records through MyHealtheVet, while Medicare beneficiaries can use Medicare.gov.
Contact the Provider: If portals don’t have what you need, contact the provider directly. Ask for “Health Information Services,” “Medical Records Department,” or staff responsible for releasing health records.
Submit a Formal Request: Providers can require written requests using their specific forms. They cannot impose unreasonable barriers like forcing you to mail physical letters when electronic submission is possible.
Verify Your Identity: Providers must verify your identity before releasing records, typically requiring photo ID or other identifying information.
Understand Fees and Timelines: Providers can charge reasonable, cost-based fees for labor and supplies but cannot charge per-page fees for electronic records or deny access due to unpaid medical bills. They have up to 30 days to fulfill requests, with possible 30-day extensions for written reasons.
Filing HIPAA Complaints
If you believe a covered entity violated your privacy rights, you can file complaints with the HHS Office for Civil Rights through their online portal, by mail using their complaint form, or by email to [email protected].
Complaints must be filed within 180 days of when you knew or should have known about the violation. The law prohibits retaliation against you for filing complaints.
Your Right to Refuse Treatment
Adult patients with decision-making capacity possess the fundamental right to accept or refuse any medical intervention recommended by healthcare providers. This right extends from the principle of autonomy and legal precedent establishing you as the ultimate authority over your own body. Your right to refuse treatment holds even if that decision could result in permanent disability or death.
Before honoring treatment refusal, especially decisions carrying serious health consequences, providers have an ethical and often legal duty to assess your “decision-making capacity.” This clinical judgment evaluates whether you can:
- Understand: Explain your medical condition and proposed treatment in your own words
- Appreciate: Articulate how information and consequences apply to your life and situation
- Reason: Weigh risks and benefits and provide rationale consistent with your stated values
- Express a Choice: Communicate a clear, consistent decision
If you’re deemed to have capacity, your decision to refuse treatment must be respected.
Physician Conscience Rights and Limitations
Physicians have limited rights to practice medicine without violating their core moral or religious beliefs. The American Medical Association recognizes that physicians are moral agents who should have “considerable latitude to practice in accord with well-considered, deeply held beliefs central to their self-identities.”
However, this conscience right has strict limits. Physicians cannot:
- Refuse care in emergencies
- Discriminate based on race, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, or other non-clinically relevant characteristics
- Refuse treatment solely because someone has an infectious disease
- Unilaterally abandon existing patients without sufficient notice and assistance finding another provider
- Refuse to honor patients’ informed decisions to refuse life-sustaining treatment
When physicians decline to provide specific, non-emergency services on conscience grounds, they must be upfront about services they don’t provide. They must still inform patients about all medically appropriate options, even those they personally object to, and generally must refer patients to other physicians or institutions willing to provide requested services.
Emergency Medical Rights Under EMTALA
The Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act, passed by Congress in 1986, protects your access to emergency care. EMTALA was designed to prevent “patient dumping,” where hospitals refused to treat or transferred uninsured patients to public facilities for financial reasons.
Any hospital participating in Medicare has two primary legal obligations to anyone seeking emergency care:
Right to Medical Screening: Hospitals must provide appropriate medical screening to determine whether an “emergency medical condition” exists. This includes conditions with acute symptoms so serious that the absence of immediate medical attention could place your health in serious jeopardy. Hospitals cannot delay screening to ask about insurance status or ability to pay.
Right to Stabilizing Treatment: If screening reveals an emergency medical condition, hospitals must provide treatment to stabilize that condition. If hospitals lack the necessary capabilities, they must arrange appropriate transfers to facilities that can provide needed care.
EMTALA creates a statutory duty ensuring access to emergency care is a right for everyone, not a privilege for those who can pay.
End-of-Life Planning and Advance Directives
Planning ahead ensures your values and preferences are respected when you can no longer speak for yourself. This process, called advance care planning, uses legal tools called advance directives—written instructions detailing your preferences for future medical care.
Types of Advance Directives
- Living Will: Specifies which medical treatments you would or would not want to prolong life if terminally ill or permanently unconscious. This covers preferences regarding CPR, mechanical ventilation, tube feeding, dialysis, and antibiotics.
- Durable Power of Attorney for Healthcare: Allows you to appoint someone you trust to make medical decisions if you become incapacitated. This person should understand your values and be willing to advocate for your wishes.
- Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) / Do Not Intubate (DNI) Orders: Specific medical orders written by doctors instructing healthcare providers not to perform CPR or intubation. You don’t need a living will to have these orders.
- Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST/MOLST): For individuals with serious illness, these are actual medical orders signed by your doctor that translate living will wishes into actionable instructions for emergency personnel.
Creating Advance Directives
Start by reflecting on your values and talking with family, your doctor, and anyone you’re considering as your proxy. Each state has specific requirements and forms available through local Area Agencies on Aging or organizations like the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization.
Complete forms with required witnessing or notarization, then distribute copies to your doctor, healthcare proxy, and close family members. Keep originals in safe but accessible places.
Minor Medical Rights
The general rule requires parents or legal guardians to provide consent for medical treatment of children under 18. However, every state has complex exceptions to this requirement recognizing that minors, especially adolescents, have evolving autonomy and may need confidential care.
Common Exceptions to Parental Consent
Medical Emergencies: Emergency treatment to preserve life or health can be provided without parental consent if parents aren’t available.
Emancipated Minors: Minors legally emancipated by court orders, marriage, or military service in some states have adult rights and can consent to their own care.
Mature Minor Doctrine: Some states allow minors who demonstrate sufficient maturity and understanding of proposed treatment to consent for themselves.
Specific Health Services: Virtually all states allow minors to consent to confidential testing and treatment for certain sensitive health issues, commonly including sexually transmitted diseases, substance abuse treatment, outpatient mental health services, and contraception and prenatal care.
Reproductive Health Rights for Minors
Reproductive health represents the most politically contested area of minor consent rights. Federal policy through the Title X family planning program has historically guaranteed confidential contraceptive services to minors, but this protection faces legal and political challenges. A 2022 federal court ruling in Texas now requires parental consent for contraceptive care at Title X clinics in that state.
The following table shows state laws regarding minor consent for contraception and abortion as of August 2025:
| State | Minor Can Consent to Contraception? | Parental Involvement for Abortion? | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | Yes (age 14+) | Consent | Parental consent required |
| Alaska | Yes | No | No parental involvement required |
| Arizona | Yes | Consent | Parental consent required, must be notarized |
| Arkansas | Yes | Consent | Parental consent required |
| California | Yes | No | No parental involvement required |
| Colorado | Yes | Notification | Parental notification required |
| Connecticut | Yes | No | No parental involvement required |
| Delaware | Yes (age 12+) | Notification | Can be waived through counseling |
| Dist. of Columbia | Yes | No | No parental involvement required |
| Florida | No (Parental Consent Required) | Consent | Parental consent required, must be notarized |
| Georgia | Yes | Notification | Parental notification required |
| Hawaii | Yes (age 14+) | Consent | Parental consent required |
| Idaho | Yes | Consent | Law criminalizes aiding minor travel out-of-state |
| Illinois | Yes (with referral) | Notification | Parental notification required |
| Indiana | No (Parental Consent Required) | Consent | Parental consent required |
| Iowa | Yes | Notification | Parental notification required |
| Kansas | No (Parental Consent Required) | Consent | Both parents’ consent required, notarized |
| Kentucky | Yes | Consent | Parental consent required |
| Louisiana | No (Parental Consent Required) | Consent | Parental consent required |
| Maine | Yes | Consent | Can be waived through counseling |
| Maryland | Yes | Notification | Can be waived by physician |
| Massachusetts | Yes | Consent | Required for minors under 16 |
| Michigan | No Explicit Policy | Consent | Parental consent required |
| Minnesota | Yes | Notification | Both parents notification required |
| Mississippi | No (Parental Consent Required) | Consent | Both parents’ consent required |
| Missouri | No (Parental Consent Required) | Consent | Parental consent required |
| Montana | Yes | Consent | Required for minors under 16 |
| Nebraska | No (Parental Consent Required) | Consent | Parental consent required, notarized |
| Nevada | Yes | No (Blocked) | Notification law blocked by courts |
| New Hampshire | No (Parental Consent Required) | Notification | Parental notification required |
| New Jersey | Yes | No | No parental involvement required |
| New Mexico | Yes | No | No parental involvement required |
| New York | Yes | No | No parental involvement required |
| North Carolina | Yes | Consent | Parental consent required |
| North Dakota | No Explicit Policy | Consent | Both parents’ consent required |
| Ohio | No Explicit Policy | Consent | Parental consent required |
| Oklahoma | No (Parental Consent Required) | Consent | Parental consent required |
| Oregon | Yes | No | No parental involvement required |
| Pennsylvania | Yes | Consent | Parental consent required |
| Rhode Island | Yes (age 16+) | Consent | Parental consent required |
| South Carolina | Yes (age 16+) | Consent | Parental consent required |
| South Dakota | No (Parental Consent Required) | Notification | Parental notification required |
| Tennessee | Yes | Consent | Parental consent required |
| Texas | No (Parental Consent Required) | Consent | Including at Title X clinics |
| Utah | No (Parental Consent Required) | Consent | Parental consent required |
| Vermont | Yes | No | No parental involvement required |
| Virginia | Yes | Consent | Consent and notification required, notarized |
| Washington | Yes | No | No parental involvement required |
| West Virginia | No (Parental Consent Required) | Notification | Parental notification required |
| Wisconsin | No Explicit Policy | Consent | Parental consent required |
| Wyoming | Yes (with referral) | Consent | Parental consent required |
Disability Rights and Medical Access
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities in all areas of public life, including healthcare services. Medical providers must provide individuals with disabilities full and equal access to their healthcare services and facilities.
This requires “reasonable modifications” to policies and practices and removal of architectural barriers when “readily achievable” without significant difficulty or expense.
ADA Requirements in Medical Settings
Accessible Exam Rooms: Clear pathways, adequate turning space for wheelchairs, and accessible entryways.
Adjustable-Height Exam Tables: Tables that can be lowered to 17-19 inches from the floor for safe wheelchair transfers.
Patient Lifts: Portable or overhead lifts when patients cannot transfer independently.
Accessible Medical Equipment: Wheelchair-accessible scales and mammography machines that can be lowered to patient height.
Staff Assistance: Reasonable assistance such as helping with transfers or getting undressed for exams.
If you believe you’ve been discriminated against or denied medical care because of a disability, you can find resources and file complaints at the Department of Justice’s ADA website.
Abortion Rights After Dobbs
No area of medical rights generates more fierce debate or legal volatility than abortion. On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization explicitly overturned Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, eliminating the nearly 50-year-old federal constitutional right to abortion and returning regulatory authority to individual states.
The immediate result fractured abortion access into a complex patchwork where your ability to get an abortion is primarily determined by your zip code.
Current State-by-State Abortion Laws
As of July 2025, states generally fall into three categories:
Total or Near-Total Bans: Abortion prohibited from conception with very few exceptions.
Gestational Limits: Abortion permitted but banned after specific points in pregnancy, such as 6, 12, 15, or 22 weeks since last menstrual period.
Broader Legal Access: Abortion remains legal up to fetal viability (around 24 weeks) or has even broader protections through legislation or voter-approved ballot measures.
Many state bans include exceptions to save the pregnant person’s life, but these are often vaguely worded, leaving doctors in legally perilous positions. Exceptions for the patient’s health, or for pregnancies from rape or incest, are less common and often come with stringent reporting requirements making them difficult to use.
| State | Status | Specific Limit | Exceptions (Life/Health/Rape/Incest/Fetal Anomaly) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | Banned | Total Ban | Life |
| Alaska | Legal | No Gestational Limit | N/A |
| Arizona | Legal | Viability | Life, Physical/Mental Health |
| Arkansas | Banned | Total Ban | Life |
| California | Legal | Viability | Life, Health |
| Colorado | Legal | No Gestational Limit | N/A |
| Connecticut | Legal | Viability | Life, Health |
| Delaware | Legal | Viability | Life, Lethal Fetal Anomaly |
| Dist. of Columbia | Legal | No Gestational Limit | N/A |
| Florida | Gestational Limit | 6 Weeks LMP | Life, Rape, Incest, Lethal Fetal Anomaly |
| Georgia | Gestational Limit | 6 Weeks LMP | Life, Lethal Fetal Anomaly, Rape/Incest (up to 20 weeks) |
| Hawaii | Legal | Viability | Life |
| Idaho | Banned | Total Ban | Life, Rape, Incest (reported) |
| Illinois | Legal | Viability | Life, Health |
| Indiana | Banned | Total Ban | Life, Health (serious risk), Rape/Incest (up to 12 weeks), Lethal Fetal Anomaly |
| Iowa | Gestational Limit | 6 Weeks LMP | Life, Rape, Incest (reported) |
| Kansas | Gestational Limit | 22 Weeks LMP | Life, Health |
| Kentucky | Banned | Total Ban | Life, Health (serious risk) |
| Louisiana | Banned | Total Ban | Life, Lethal Fetal Anomaly |
| Maine | Legal | Viability | Life, Health |
| Maryland | Legal | No Gestational Limit | N/A |
| Massachusetts | Legal | 24 Weeks LMP | Life, Health, Lethal Fetal Anomaly |
| Michigan | Legal | Viability | Life, Health |
| Minnesota | Legal | Viability | Life, Health |
| Mississippi | Banned | Total Ban | Life, Rape |
| Missouri | Legal | Viability | Life |
| Montana | Legal | Viability | Life, Health |
| Nebraska | Gestational Limit | 12 Weeks LMP | Life, Rape, Incest |
| Nevada | Legal | Viability | Life, Health |
| New Hampshire | Gestational Limit | 24 Weeks LMP | Life, Lethal Fetal Anomaly |
| New Jersey | Legal | No Gestational Limit | N/A |
| New Mexico | Legal | No Gestational Limit | N/A |
| New York | Legal | Viability | Life, Health |
| North Carolina | Gestational Limit | 12 Weeks LMP | Life, Rape, Incest, Lethal Fetal Anomaly |
| North Dakota | Banned | Total Ban | Life, Rape, Incest (up to 6 weeks) |
| Ohio | Legal | Viability | Life, Health |
| Oklahoma | Banned | Total Ban | Life, Rape, Incest (reported) |
| Oregon | Legal | No Gestational Limit | N/A |
| Pennsylvania | Gestational Limit | 24 Weeks LMP | Life, Health |
| Rhode Island | Legal | Viability | Life, Health |
| South Carolina | Gestational Limit | 6 Weeks LMP | Life, Health, Rape/Incest (up to 12 weeks), Lethal Fetal Anomaly |
| South Dakota | Banned | Total Ban | Life |
| Tennessee | Banned | Total Ban | Life |
| Texas | Banned | Total Ban | Life |
| Utah | Gestational Limit | 18 Weeks LMP | Life, Health, Rape, Incest, Lethal Fetal Anomaly |
| Vermont | Legal | No Gestational Limit | N/A |
| Virginia | Legal | Viability | Life, Health |
| Washington | Legal | Viability | Life, Health |
| West Virginia | Banned | Total Ban | Life, Lethal Fetal Anomaly, Rape/Incest (reported, up to 14 weeks for adults, 8 weeks for minors) |
| Wisconsin | Gestational Limit | 22 Weeks LMP | Life |
| Wyoming | Banned | Total Ban | Life, Rape, Incest |
Medication Abortion Restrictions
Medication abortion, using mifepristone and misoprostol, accounted for 63% of all U.S. abortions in 2023. Because pills can be prescribed via telehealth and mailed to patients, this method has become a primary focus of legal and political battles.
Even in states where abortion remains legal, many impose specific restrictions not applied to other prescriptions with similar safety profiles:
Physician-Only Requirements: Laws in 26 states mandate that only physicians can dispense medication, prohibiting qualified nurse practitioners or physician assistants.
Telehealth Bans: Seven states explicitly ban telehealth for medication abortion, requiring at least one in-person visit.
In-Person Dispensing: Eighteen states require pills to be dispensed in person, negating telehealth benefits.
A significant new legal strategy seeks nationwide medication abortion bans through the Comstock Act, a largely dormant 1873 anti-obscenity law that could criminalize mailing any article used for abortion. While the Department of Justice states the law doesn’t apply to mailing medication for legal abortions, conservative policy blueprints like “Project 2025” have made reviving the Comstock Act a central goal.
Real-World Impact of Restrictions
Abortion restrictions create documented consequences for health, safety, and equity. Research shows disproportionate impacts on women of color and low-income individuals, as bans concentrate in regions where higher percentages of Black, American Indian, and Alaska Native women live—groups already facing stark maternal mortality disparities.
For those in states with bans, options include traveling to states where abortion is legal—incurring costs for transportation, lodging, childcare, and lost wages—or attempting to obtain medication abortion pills online. KFF polling shows one in five women of reproductive age living in states with total bans say they or someone they know has had difficulty obtaining abortion since Roe was overturned.
Public opinion data reveals that majorities of women living in states with bans believe abortion should be legal in all or most cases. There’s overwhelming support, even in ban states, for laws protecting access to abortion for patients experiencing miscarriages or pregnancy emergencies and protecting patients’ rights to travel to other states for care. Since Dobbs, every time abortion rights have been put directly to voters on state ballots, the side favoring abortion access has prevailed.
Understanding Your Rights in Practice
Your medical rights exist within a complex system where federal laws, state regulations, institutional policies, and individual provider practices intersect. The strength of these rights depends not just on their legal foundation but on your knowledge of how to exercise them effectively.
The healthcare system can feel overwhelming, but understanding these fundamental principles—informed consent, privacy protections, the right to refuse treatment, and access guarantees—provides the foundation for being an active, informed participant in your own medical care. These rights evolved through decades of legal development, ethical reflection, and patient advocacy, creating protections designed to ensure your autonomy remains central to the patient-provider relationship.
Our articles make government information more accessible. Please consult a qualified professional for financial, legal, or health advice specific to your circumstances.