Last updated 7 months ago. Our resources are updated regularly but please keep in mind that links, programs, policies, and contact information do change.
- Understanding Your Rights in Special Education Evaluation
- IDEA and Your Fundamental Rights: The Basics
- Initiating an Evaluation: Getting the Process Started
- Giving Consent: Your Voice, Your Choice
- Prior Written Notice (PWN): Keeping You in the Loop
- The Evaluation Journey: Steps, Scope, and Timelines
- Accessing Educational Records: Your Right to Know
- Participating in Meetings: Your Role on the Team
- Determining Eligibility: Understanding the Decision
- Independent Educational Evaluation (IEE): Your Right to a Second Opinion
- Resolving Conflicts: When You Disagree
- State Rules Matter: Finding Local Regulations and Resources
- Empowered Parents, Appropriate Education
Understanding Your Rights in Special Education Evaluation
For parents concerned about their child’s learning or development, the special education evaluation process can feel overwhelming. Understanding this process and the rights afforded to parents under federal law is fundamental.
The evaluation is the critical first step to determining if a child is eligible for specialized instruction and support designed to meet their unique needs. The cornerstone of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) is the guarantee of a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) for eligible children with disabilities. FAPE means special education and related services provided at public expense, under public supervision, and without charge, which meet state standards and conform with an Individualized Education Program (IEP).
Securing FAPE depends on an appropriate evaluation. The information gathered directly informs whether a child is found eligible and what specific services and supports are necessary. A thorough and accurate evaluation is the foundation upon which an effective IEP is built. Conversely, a flawed evaluation can lead to an inappropriate IEP, potentially denying a child the FAPE they’re entitled to receive.
Parents are not merely bystanders in this process; IDEA establishes parents as essential members of the team making decisions about their child’s education. The law provides specific rights, known as procedural safeguards, designed to ensure meaningful participation and consideration of parental concerns. These safeguards empower parents to be active partners in securing appropriate educational services for their child.
This guide aims to demystify the special education evaluation process under IDEA Part B, which covers children aged 3 through 21. It equips parents and guardians with the knowledge needed to understand their rights and advocate effectively during this crucial phase.
IDEA and Your Fundamental Rights: The Basics
Quick Overview of IDEA Part B
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) is the primary federal law ensuring that children with disabilities receive needed educational services and supports. IDEA Part B specifically addresses the needs of eligible children aged 3 through 21.
At the heart of IDEA Part B is the mandate for schools to provide a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) to every eligible child with a disability. FAPE is not one-size-fits-all; it means special education and related services tailored to the individual child’s unique needs, provided at no cost to parents, designed to enable progress, and prepare for further education, employment, and independent living.
To ensure identification of children who need these services, IDEA includes Child Find. This legal obligation requires states and local school districts to actively identify, locate, and evaluate all children who may have disabilities and need special education services. This duty applies regardless of disability severity and includes children in public or private schools, homeschooled children, highly mobile children (like migrant or homeless children), and children who are wards of the state. Child Find explains why a school might initiate an evaluation even without a parent’s formal request; the school system has a legal responsibility to seek out and evaluate children potentially needing support.
Procedural Safeguards: Your Built-in Protections
To ensure parents can effectively participate in securing FAPE for their child, IDEA includes Procedural Safeguards. These specific rights and protections are guaranteed to parents and their children with disabilities throughout the special education process.
Schools must provide parents with a written explanation of these rights, typically in a Procedural Safeguards Notice. This notice must be given:
- At least once a year
- Upon initial referral or parental request for evaluation
- The first time a state complaint or due process complaint is filed
- When a disciplinary action constituting a change of placement is made
- Upon parental request
This notice is a critical resource – more than just a formality, it’s the official documentation of parental rights under IDEA. Parents should read it carefully, ask questions if anything is unclear, and keep it for reference.
Key procedural safeguards particularly relevant during evaluation include:
- The right to receive Prior Written Notice (PWN) before the school proposes or refuses certain actions
- The right to give or refuse informed consent for evaluations and services
- The right to inspect and review educational records
- The right to participate in meetings concerning identification, evaluation, placement, and FAPE
- The right to obtain an Independent Educational Evaluation (IEE) if disagreeing with the school’s evaluation
- The right to use dispute resolution options like mediation, state complaints, or due process hearings
Initiating an Evaluation: Getting the Process Started
Your Right to Request an Evaluation
Parents play a crucial role in identifying potential needs and initiating the special education process. Under IDEA, parents have the right to request an evaluation for their child at any time if they suspect a disability that requires special education and related services. This suspicion might arise from difficulties with schoolwork, observed behavioral or social challenges, developmental delays, or a medical diagnosis.
While you can make a request verbally, it’s strongly recommended to submit it in writing (a dated letter or email) to the school principal, child’s teacher, or district’s special education director. A written request creates a clear record and triggers specific legal timelines that the school district must follow. Without this written documentation, it can be difficult to hold the school accountable for timely action.
Your written request should be clear and concise, including:
- The current date
- Your child’s full name and date of birth
- The child’s school and grade/teacher (if applicable)
- A clear statement requesting a “full and individual initial evaluation” to determine eligibility for special education services under IDEA
- A brief description of your concerns (e.g., difficulties with reading comprehension, trouble following directions, challenges with peer interactions, persistent anxiety affecting school participation)
- Your name, address, phone number, and email address
- A closing requesting a response outlining the next steps and any necessary consent forms
It’s important to understand the relationship between interventions provided in general education, such as Response to Intervention (RtI) or Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS), and the right to request an evaluation. While schools often use these frameworks to support struggling learners, a school cannot require a child to complete an RtI or MTSS process before agreeing to conduct a special education evaluation if a disability is reasonably suspected. Parents have the right to request a formal evaluation under IDEA at any time, even if the child is currently receiving RtI/MTSS interventions.
When the School Recommends Evaluation
Schools may also initiate the evaluation process. This often happens when a child’s teacher, school psychologist, or other personnel observe persistent academic or behavioral difficulties, or when results from school-wide screenings suggest a potential issue. Data gathered through RtI/MTSS might also lead the school to suspect a disability requiring more intensive support.
Even when the school initiates the request, they must first obtain informed written consent from the parent before conducting the initial evaluation. The school cannot proceed with testing without parental permission for this first evaluation.
The School’s “Child Find” Duty
The school’s ability to recommend evaluation is tied to its Child Find obligation under IDEA. As mentioned earlier, schools have a legal duty to actively identify children who might have disabilities and need special education. This proactive requirement means schools should not wait for a child to fail significantly before considering an evaluation.
Giving Consent: Your Voice, Your Choice
The Requirement for Informed Parental Consent
Parental consent is a cornerstone of the IDEA process, ensuring parents are informed decision-makers regarding their child’s education. “Informed Consent” under IDEA means that the parent:
- Has been fully informed of all relevant information in their native language or other mode of communication
- Understands and agrees in writing to the activity
- Understands that consent is voluntary and may be revoked at any time (although revocation is not retroactive)
Specific consent requirements apply at different stages:
Initial Evaluation: The school must obtain informed written parental consent before conducting the first evaluation to determine if a child qualifies as a “child with a disability” under IDEA. Consenting to an evaluation is NOT consenting to the provision of special education services. These are separate consents.
Reevaluation: Informed parental consent is generally required before a school conducts a reevaluation of a child already receiving special education services. However, if the school demonstrates it took reasonable measures to obtain consent and the parent failed to respond, the school may proceed with the reevaluation without consent.
Initial Provision of Services: Before the school can begin providing special education and related services to a child for the first time, it must obtain informed written parental consent.
What Does “Informed” Mean?
To be “informed,” parents must receive clear information about the proposed activity. In the context of evaluation, this means the school should explain what the evaluation will involve. This information is often provided as part of the Prior Written Notice (PWN) that proposes the evaluation. The notice should describe the areas the school plans to assess (e.g., reading skills, cognitive abilities, social-emotional functioning), the types of procedures or tests that might be used, and potentially who will conduct the assessments. Parents have the right to ask questions to ensure they fully understand what they are consenting to.
Consequences of Refusing Consent
Parents have the right to refuse consent, but the consequences differ depending on the stage:
Refusal for Initial Evaluation: If a parent refuses consent for an initial evaluation, or fails to respond to a request for consent, the school district may choose to pursue the evaluation by utilizing IDEA’s procedural safeguards, which could include requesting mediation or filing for a due process hearing. However, the school is not required to take these steps. This option to potentially override parental refusal does not apply if the child is homeschooled or attends a private school at the parents’ expense.
Refusal for Initial Services: If a parent refuses consent to the initial provision of special education services (after the child has been found eligible), the school cannot use mediation or due process to override the refusal. The school is legally prohibited from providing the services without consent. In this situation, the school will not be considered in violation of its FAPE obligation.
Refusal for Reevaluation: If a parent refuses consent for a reevaluation, the school district may (but is not required to) pursue the reevaluation through mediation or due process. If the parent simply fails to respond after reasonable efforts by the school, consent is not needed for reevaluation.
The distinction between the school’s ability to potentially override refusal for evaluation versus the absolute parental right to refuse initial services is significant. It reflects a balance between the state’s interest in identifying children with disabilities (Child Find) and the parent’s fundamental right to make decisions about their child’s education and services.
Prior Written Notice (PWN): Keeping You in the Loop
What is PWN? When Must the School Provide It?
Prior Written Notice (PWN) is a critical procedural safeguard under IDEA. It is a formal, written explanation that the school district must provide to parents whenever it proposes to initiate or change—or refuses to initiate or change—key aspects of a child’s special education.
PWN must be provided for proposals or refusals related to the child’s:
- Identification: Determining if the child has a disability or changing their eligibility category
- Evaluation: Conducting an initial evaluation, conducting a reevaluation, refusing a parent’s request for an evaluation, or changing the scope or methods of evaluation
- Educational Placement: The setting where the child receives services
- Provision of FAPE: The special education and related services outlined in the IEP
The notice must be given after the school district has made a decision but before it implements the proposed action or refusal. The law requires it be provided a “reasonable time” beforehand. While IDEA doesn’t define “reasonable time,” some states do (e.g., Virginia suggests 10 business days, Texas requires 5 school days). This timing allows parents sufficient time to review the decision, understand the school’s reasoning, ask questions, and decide whether they agree or wish to challenge the decision before the change takes effect.
Essential Information Included in PWN
IDEA mandates that every PWN must contain seven specific components:
- A description of the action that the school district proposes or refuses to take
- An explanation of why the school is proposing or refusing the action
- A description of each evaluation procedure, assessment, record, or report used as a basis for the decision
- A statement that parents have protections under the procedural safeguards of IDEA and information on how to obtain a copy
- Sources for parents to contact for assistance in understanding IDEA provisions
- A description of other options the IEP team considered and why they were rejected
- A description of other relevant factors to the school’s proposal or refusal
This notice must be written in language understandable to the general public and provided in the parent’s native language or other mode of communication (e.g., Braille, sign language), unless clearly not feasible.
Using PWN as an Advocacy Tool
Prior Written Notice is more than just a notification; it’s a powerful advocacy and accountability tool:
- Documentation: PWN provides a formal, written record of the school’s decisions and justifications.
- Transparency: The requirement to detail the “why,” the data used, and the options rejected forces the school to articulate its reasoning clearly and base decisions on evidence.
- Requesting PWN: If the school communicates a decision informally, parents have the right to request formal Prior Written Notice.
- Identifying Weaknesses: Reviewing the PWN, particularly the data used and options rejected, can help identify potential flaws in the school’s reasoning.
- Evidence for Disputes: PWN serves as crucial evidence should parents pursue dispute resolution options.
- Ensuring Accuracy: Parents should review the PWN carefully after meetings to ensure it accurately reflects discussions, decisions, and any disagreements.
The Evaluation Journey: Steps, Scope, and Timelines
Federal Timelines and State Variations
IDEA establishes specific timelines for the initial evaluation process, but states may establish their own timelines if they’re not less protective than federal requirements.
Initial Evaluation Completion: Under federal IDEA regulations, the initial evaluation must be completed within 60 calendar days of receiving informed written parental consent.
State Timelines: Many states have established their own timelines, which may differ from the federal 60-day rule. For example, some states use 45 school days after receiving consent. “School days” typically exclude weekends, holidays, and sometimes summer breaks.
Exceptions to Timelines: The standard timeline may not apply when a parent repeatedly fails or refuses to produce the child for evaluation, or when a child transfers to a new school district after the evaluation process has begun but before completion.
Eligibility Meeting: IDEA requires the eligibility determination be made by a team including the parents after the evaluation assessments are completed.
IEP Meeting (Post-Eligibility): If a child is found eligible for special education services, an IEP meeting must be scheduled and held within 30 calendar days of the eligibility determination.
Key Timelines in the Special Education Evaluation Process
| Event | Federal Timeline (IDEA) | Common State Variations | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| School Receives Written Consent for Evaluation | Day 0 – Timeline starts here | Day 0 – Timeline starts here | |
| Completion of Initial Evaluation | Within 60 calendar days of receiving consent | Within 45-60 school days (check state rules) | For completion of the evaluation process, typically culminating in the eligibility determination meeting |
| Eligibility Determination Meeting | Must occur after evaluation completion. Often considered part of the 60-day window | Typically held within the state’s evaluation timeframe | Parents are required participants |
| IEP Meeting (if found eligible) | Within 30 calendar days of eligibility determination | Within 30 calendar days of eligibility determination | |
| Provision of PWN | Reasonable time before the school proposes/refuses action | State may specify minimum days (e.g., 5 school days, 10 business days) | Required for proposing evaluation, determining eligibility, etc. |
| Parent Request for Evaluation – School Response | IDEA encourages prompt response, but no specific federal deadline | State laws often set deadlines (e.g., 15 school days) | This initial response timeline precedes the evaluation clock, which starts upon consent |
Scope of the Evaluation: Comprehensive and Individualized
IDEA requires that the evaluation be comprehensive and individualized. This means the evaluation must:
- Use a variety of assessment tools and strategies
- Assess all areas related to the suspected disability
- Be sufficiently comprehensive to identify all special education and related service needs
- Be conducted by trained and knowledgeable personnel
- Be technically sound
- Be non-discriminatory
- Be administered in the child’s native language or mode of communication
Parent Input: Crucial Information
Parents possess invaluable knowledge about their child’s strengths, weaknesses, developmental history, and experiences outside of school. IDEA requires that the school gather relevant information from parents as part of the evaluation process.
Parents should be prepared to share:
- Their specific concerns about learning, behavior, or development
- The child’s developmental milestones
- Any relevant medical history or diagnoses
- The child’s strengths, interests, and talents
- How the child functions at home and in the community
- Strategies that have worked (or not worked) at home or in previous settings
- Any private evaluations or reports they may have
Schools often use parent questionnaires or interviews to gather this information. This parental perspective is a legally required component of a comprehensive evaluation.
Reevaluations: Checking In and Updating Needs
Once a child is receiving special education services, evaluations don’t stop. IDEA requires reevaluations:
- At least once every three years (triennial evaluation), unless the parent and school agree in writing that a reevaluation is unnecessary
- More frequently if the school determines educational or related services needs warrant it, or if requested by parent or teacher
- Before determining that a child is no longer eligible for special education
- Not more than once a year unless the parent and school agree otherwise
The purpose of reevaluation is to determine:
- Whether the child continues to meet the definition of a “child with a disability”
- The child’s present levels of academic achievement and functional performance
- Whether the child continues to need special education and related services
- Whether any additions or modifications to services are needed
The reevaluation process starts with a review of existing evaluation data (REED), conducted by the IEP team including the parent. Based on this review, the team decides what additional data are needed.
Accessing Educational Records: Your Right to Know
What Constitutes “Educational Records”?
Parents have a fundamental right under both IDEA and the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) to access their child’s educational records.
Under FERPA, educational records are defined broadly as records that are:
- Directly related to a student; and
- Maintained by an educational agency or institution or by a party acting for the agency or institution
This definition is very inclusive, encompassing grades, test scores, attendance records, health records, special education records (evaluation reports, IEPs, PWNs), correspondence regarding the student, and potentially emails or video footage focusing on the student.
Records not considered “educational records” under FERPA include:
- Records kept in the sole possession of the maker and not accessible to others
- Law enforcement unit records maintained separately
- Employment records (not contingent on being a student)
- Medical treatment records not disclosed to others
- Records created after a student is no longer enrolled
Your Rights: Inspect, Review, and Get Copies
IDEA and FERPA grant parents several key rights:
- Right to Inspect and Review: Parents can inspect all educational records related to their child that are collected, maintained, or used by the school district.
- Timely Access: The school must comply with requests without unnecessary delay, before any IEP meeting or hearing, and within 45 calendar days.
- Access for Both Parents: Unless limited by court order or law, both parents have equal access rights.
- Right to an Explanation: Parents can receive explanations and interpretations of the records from school officials.
- Right to Have a Representative Present: Parents may have a representative accompany them to review records.
- Right to Obtain Copies: Schools must provide copies if failure to do so would prevent the parent from exercising their inspection right.
- Right to a List of Record Types and Locations: Parents can request a list of types and locations of educational records collected, maintained, or used by the agency.
Requesting and Correcting Records
Making the Request: Submit your request to inspect records in writing to the school principal or records custodian. Clearly state that you wish to inspect and review your child’s educational records and provide your contact information.
Correcting Inaccurate Records: If you believe information is inaccurate, misleading, or violates privacy rights, you can request that the school amend the record:
- If the school agrees, it will amend the record and inform you in writing.
- If the school disagrees, it must inform you and advise of your right to a hearing.
- If the hearing determines the information is inaccurate, the record must be amended.
- If the hearing determines the information is accurate, you have the right to place a statement in the record commenting on the contested information.
This right to challenge generally applies to factual inaccuracies, not disagreements with opinions (like grades or evaluation opinions).
Participating in Meetings: Your Role on the Team
Parents as Equal Partners: Your Right to Participate
IDEA emphasizes the crucial role of parents in the special education process, establishing them as required and equal members of the team that makes decisions regarding their child’s identification, evaluation, educational placement, and FAPE provision.
Specifically concerning evaluation, parents have the right to participate in meetings where decisions are made about:
- Initial Evaluation Planning
- Review of Existing Evaluation Data (REED) for Reevaluation
- Eligibility Determination
Ensuring Meaningful Participation
To ensure parents can participate meaningfully, schools must:
- Notify Parents of Meetings: Early enough to ensure opportunity to attend
- Schedule at a Mutually Agreed Time and Place
- Provide Notice Content: Purpose, time, location, and who will attend
- Offer Alternative Participation: Options like telephone calls or video conferencing
- Proceed Without Parent Only if Necessary: And only after documented attempts to ensure participation
- Ensure Parent Understanding: Including arranging for interpreters if needed
- Provide Evaluation Results: Parents must receive a copy of the evaluation report and eligibility documentation at no cost
Preparing for Evaluation and Eligibility Meetings
Effective participation requires preparation. Parents can maximize their contribution by:
- Reviewing Records: Procedural Safeguards Notice, PWNs, previous reports, work samples, and the evaluation report if provided in advance
- Making Notes: Key concerns, questions, observations about strengths and needs, and desired outcomes
- Understanding the Purpose: Be clear about the specific meeting purpose
- Considering Bringing Support: Parents can bring others with knowledge or expertise regarding the child
- Knowing Who Should Attend: Understanding the legally required meeting participants
- Focusing on Collaboration: Approaching with a collaborative mindset while being prepared to advocate firmly if necessary
Determining Eligibility: Understanding the Decision
The Eligibility Meeting: Purpose and Participants
After the evaluation assessments are completed, the eligibility determination meeting takes place. This is where a group convenes to decide whether the child meets the criteria under IDEA to be classified as a “child with a disability” requiring special education and related services.
The purpose is to:
- Review and discuss the evaluation results
- Determine if the child meets criteria for one or more disability categories and needs special education services
Required participants include:
- The parent(s)
- Qualified professionals
- A representative of the school district
- The child’s regular education teacher (if applicable)
- Other individuals with relevant knowledge
- The child (when appropriate)
The Two-Prong Eligibility Test Under IDEA
Eligibility under IDEA requires affirmative answers to two key questions:
- Does the child meet the criteria for one or more of the 13 specific disability categories defined in IDEA?
- Autism
- Deaf-blindness
- Deafness
- Developmental delay (often for ages 3-9, varies by state)
- Emotional disturbance
- Hearing impairment
- Intellectual disability
- Multiple disabilities
- Orthopedic impairment
- Other health impairment (includes conditions like ADHD, epilepsy, diabetes)
- Specific learning disability
- Speech or language impairment
- Traumatic brain injury
- Visual impairment (including blindness)
- Does the child, because of that disability, need special education and related services? The disability must adversely affect educational performance to the extent that specially designed instruction is required.
Exclusionary factors: The child’s learning problems cannot be primarily the result of:
- Lack of appropriate instruction in reading or math
- Limited English proficiency
What Happens if the Child is Found Eligible?
If the team determines the child meets both prongs of the eligibility test, the child is formally identified as a “child with a disability” under IDEA. The next step is developing an Individualized Education Program (IEP) within 30 calendar days. The IEP meeting involves many of the same team members and focuses on creating a plan outlining specific educational goals, services, accommodations, and placement.
What Happens if the Child is Found Not Eligible?
If the eligibility group determines the child does not meet the criteria, the child is found not eligible for special education under IDEA.
The school must provide Prior Written Notice explaining the decision, reasons, evaluation data used, and procedural safeguards.
Parents have several options if they disagree:
- Discuss concerns with the school team
- Request an Independent Educational Evaluation (IEE)
- Consider Section 504 evaluation
- Utilize dispute resolution options
Independent Educational Evaluation (IEE): Your Right to a Second Opinion
What is an IEE?
An Independent Educational Evaluation (IEE) is an evaluation conducted by a qualified examiner who is not employed by the school district responsible for the child’s education. Essentially, it’s a second opinion from an outside expert.
When Can Parents Request an IEE at Public Expense?
Parents have the right under IDEA to request an IEE at public expense if they disagree with an evaluation conducted by the school district. “Public expense” means the school district pays for the full cost of the evaluation or ensures it is otherwise provided at no cost to the parent.
The right to request an IEE arises after the school has completed its own evaluation and the parent has reviewed the results and disagrees with the findings, conclusions, or recommendations. Disagreement could relate to:
- The specific tests used or areas assessed
- The interpretation of test results
- The conclusion about whether the child has a disability
- The conclusion about the child’s specific educational needs
The School’s Responsibilities When an IEE is Requested
When a parent requests an IEE at public expense, the school district has only two options:
- Fund the IEE: The school must provide information about where an IEE may be obtained and the district’s criteria for IEEs (location, qualifications, reasonable cost limits), then pay for it without unnecessary delay.
- File for Due Process: The school must, without unnecessary delay, initiate a due process hearing to demonstrate that its own evaluation was appropriate.
- If the hearing officer determines the school’s evaluation was appropriate, the parent still has the right to obtain an IEE, but not at public expense.
- If the hearing officer determines the school’s evaluation was not appropriate, the school district must pay for the IEE.
The school cannot simply refuse the request or unreasonably delay its response.
Parents’ Right to Obtain an IEE at Their Own Expense
Parents always have the right to obtain an IEE at their own expense at any time, regardless of whether they agree or disagree with the school’s evaluation.
Using the Results of an IEE
Whether obtained at public or private expense, if an IEE meets the school district’s criteria, the results must be considered by the school district in any decision regarding FAPE. The IEP team must review the IEE report and discuss its findings and recommendations.
Additionally, the IEE report may be presented as evidence in a due process hearing.
Key Considerations:
- One IEE per Evaluation: Generally, parents are entitled to only one IEE at public expense each time the school conducts an evaluation with which they disagree.
- Written Request: While not legally required, it’s best practice to make requests for an IEE at public expense in writing.
- Choosing the Evaluator: If the IEE is funded by the school, the parent typically chooses the evaluator, provided they meet the district’s criteria.
Resolving Conflicts: When You Disagree
Overview of Dispute Resolution Options Under IDEA
Disagreements can arise during evaluation and eligibility determination. IDEA provides several mechanisms for resolution:
Informal Negotiations: Often the first step is trying to resolve disagreements directly with the school team through discussion, clarification, and compromise.
Mediation:
- A voluntary process with a qualified, impartial mediator
- Both parties must agree to mediate
- Discussions are confidential
- Provided at no cost to parents
- Results in a legally binding written agreement if successful
- Cannot be used to deny or delay due process rights
State Complaint:
- A written complaint filed with the State Education Agency
- Must allege violation of IDEA or state special education law
- Must be filed within one year of the alleged violation
- The SEA must investigate and issue a written decision within 60 calendar days
- If violations are found, the SEA orders corrective actions
- No cost to file
Due Process Complaint and Hearing:
- A formal, legal process initiated by filing a written complaint
- Can be filed by either parent or school district
- Must be filed within two years of when the party knew or should have known about the alleged action
- Requires a “resolution meeting” within 15 days of complaint (unless waived)
- If unresolved, proceeds to a formal hearing before an impartial hearing officer
- Results in a legally binding written decision
- Can be appealed to the SEA and then to court
- Parents often hire attorneys or advocates (potential cost)
“Stay Put” Rights (Child’s Placement During Disputes)
A critical protection for parents who disagree with a proposed change is the “stay put” provision:
- When a parent files a due process complaint, the child generally remains in their current educational placement while proceedings are ongoing
- This prevents the school from making disputed changes before formal resolution
- “Stay put” is automatically triggered by filing a due process complaint
- “Current educational placement” typically refers to the last agreed-upon IEP
- There are specific exceptions for certain disciplinary actions
Choosing the Right Option
The best dispute resolution path depends on the specific situation:
- Mediation is often good for resolving specific issues collaboratively and preserving relationships
- State Complaint can be effective for addressing clear procedural violations and doesn’t require a formal hearing or attorney
- Due Process Hearing is typically for significant disagreements about eligibility, placement, services, or FAPE that cannot be resolved through other means
State Rules Matter: Finding Local Regulations and Resources
Federal Floor, State Ceiling
While IDEA provides the foundational framework and minimum requirements for special education nationwide, states can establish their own laws and regulations that build upon or clarify federal mandates.
Think of IDEA as setting the “floor” – the minimum level of rights and services that must be provided. States cannot offer less protection than IDEA guarantees but can provide more protections or benefits.
Examples of where state rules might differ:
- Evaluation timelines
- Disability category criteria
- Definition of “Developmental Delay”
- IEP requirements
- Procedural safeguards
- Funding mechanisms
- Terminology
Finding Your State’s Department of Education and Regulations
Every state has a State Education Agency (SEA), usually called the Department of Education or Department of Public Instruction, responsible for overseeing special education.
To find your state’s resources:
- Search online for “[Your State Name] Department of Education Special Education”
- Look for sections labeled “Special Education,” “Exceptional Children,” or “Student Support Services”
- Find links to “State Regulations,” “Rules,” “Policies,” “Administrative Code,” or “Statutes”
- Look for parent resources like handbooks or guides that explain rules in accessible language
Key Resources: Parent Training and Information Centers (PTIs) and Community Parent Resource Centers (CPRCs)
IDEA funds a nationwide network of Parent Training and Information Centers (PTIs) and Community Parent Resource Centers (CPRCs) to help families of children with disabilities.
These centers provide:
- Information and training on IDEA, state rules, IEPs, evaluation processes, and advocacy skills
- One-on-one help understanding rights, reviewing documents, preparing for meetings
- Opportunities to connect with other parents
- Resource referrals
Every state has at least one PTI, and many states also have CPRCs serving specific high-need communities.
To find your local PTI/CPRC: Visit the Center for Parent Information and Resources (CPIR) website
Empowered Parents, Appropriate Education
The special education evaluation process is the gateway to securing the supports and services a child with a disability needs to thrive in school. Understanding your rights under IDEA—to request an evaluation, give informed consent, receive Prior Written Notice, access records, participate in meetings, obtain an Independent Educational Evaluation, and utilize dispute resolution options—is essential for effective advocacy.
These rights ensure that parents are equal partners in the decision-making process. They provide the tools needed to ensure the evaluation is comprehensive, accurate, and truly reflects the child’s individual needs. Knowledge of timelines, required assessments, eligibility criteria, and procedural safeguards empowers you to ask informed questions, monitor the process, and hold the school system accountable.
Remember, the ultimate goal is to determine eligibility and gather information necessary to develop an effective IEP that provides FAPE. An appropriate evaluation is the foundation upon which FAPE is built.
Don’t hesitate to utilize available resources. Contact your state’s Parent Training and Information Center, consult your Procedural Safeguards Notice, and explore your State Department of Education’s website for local regulations and guides.
By understanding your rights and actively participating in the evaluation process, you become a powerful advocate for your child, ensuring they receive the appropriate education they need and deserve.
Our articles make government information more accessible. Please consult a qualified professional for financial, legal, or health advice specific to your circumstances.