Last updated 3 months ago. Our resources are updated regularly but please keep in mind that links, programs, policies, and contact information do change.
Your Voice Matters in Your Child’s Education
The process of developing an Individualized Education Program (IEP) for a child with a disability is intended to be a collaborative partnership between parents and the school. Parents bring unique expertise about their child, while educators bring professional knowledge. However, disagreements can and often do arise regarding evaluations, eligibility, goals, services, or educational placement.
When disagreements occur, parents may feel unheard, frustrated, overwhelmed, or uncertain about next steps. It’s important to know that federal law provides a framework specifically designed to address these situations. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) grants parents significant rights and establishes procedures to ensure their voice is heard and that their child receives a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) tailored to their unique needs.
This guide provides a comprehensive overview of parents’ rights under IDEA when they disagree with the school system regarding their child’s IEP.
Understanding IDEA and the IEP
Navigating disagreements effectively requires understanding the law and the document at the center of special education: the IEP.
What is IDEA?
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) is the primary federal law governing how states and public agencies provide early intervention, special education, and related services to eligible children with disabilities. First passed in 1975 (originally as the Education for All Handicapped Children Act), IDEA aims to ensure that all children with disabilities have access to a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE).
FAPE means special education and related services that are:
- Provided at public expense, under public supervision and direction
- Without charge to families
- Meet state educational agency standards
- Include appropriate education in the state
- Provided in conformity with the IEP
The services must be designed to meet the child’s unique needs and prepare them for further education, employment, and independent living.
A key principle established by the Supreme Court case Board of Education v. Rowley (1982) is that IDEA requires schools to provide an IEP reasonably calculated to enable the child to receive educational benefit. This doesn’t mean schools must maximize a child’s potential. However, the Supreme Court clarified in Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District (2017) that the educational benefit must be more than minimal. The standard is whether the IEP is “reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances,” a standard described as “markedly more demanding” than the minimal test. What constitutes “appropriate progress” varies depending on the individual child’s abilities and needs.
For comprehensive information from the U.S. Department of Education, parents can visit the official IDEA website.
Key Components of an IEP
The Individualized Education Program (IEP) is the cornerstone of a child’s special education under IDEA. It is a legally binding written document developed by a team that includes parents and school personnel (and the student, when appropriate). The IEP outlines the specific special education instruction, supports, and related services the school will provide to meet the student’s unique needs.
By law, every IEP must include:
Present Levels of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance (PLOP/PLAAFP)
This section describes how the child is currently performing in school, including academic, developmental, and functional areas. It explains how the disability affects involvement and progress in the general education curriculum. This information typically comes from evaluations, tests, observations, and parent input.
Annual Goals
These are measurable goals the child can reasonably achieve within one year. Goals must address needs resulting from the disability to enable progress in the general curriculum and meet other educational needs. Goals can be academic, social, behavioral, physical, or functional. Vague or unmeasurable goals are a common problem and make it difficult to track progress.
Measuring and Reporting Progress
The IEP must state how progress toward annual goals will be measured and when parents will receive periodic reports on that progress. Progress reports must indicate if the progress is sufficient for the child to achieve the goals by year’s end.
Special Education and Related Services
This details the specific services the child will receive, including:
- Special education instruction
- Related services (like speech therapy, occupational therapy, counseling)
- Supplementary aids and services
- Program modifications or supports for school personnel
Participation with Nondisabled Peers (Least Restrictive Environment – LRE)
The IEP must explain the extent to which the child will not participate with nondisabled children in regular class and other school activities. IDEA presumes that children with disabilities should be educated with their nondisabled peers to the maximum extent appropriate. Removal from the regular education environment should only occur when education in regular classes with supplementary aids and services cannot be achieved satisfactorily. Disputes often arise regarding LRE determinations.
Participation in State and District-Wide Assessments
The IEP must state any individual accommodations needed for the child to participate in these tests. If the IEP team determines a particular test is not appropriate, the IEP must explain why and how the child will be assessed instead.
Service Details (Frequency, Location, Duration)
The IEP must specify when services will begin, how often they will be provided, where they will be provided, and for how long they will last.
Transition Services (Age 14/16+)
Beginning not later than the first IEP to be in effect when the child turns 16 (or younger if determined appropriate, and required by age 14 in some states like Texas and Virginia), the IEP must include measurable postsecondary goals based on age-appropriate transition assessments related to training, education, employment, and independent living skills. The IEP must also include the transition services needed to assist the child in reaching those goals.
Because the IEP is the legal document defining the school’s commitment to providing FAPE, its quality and implementation are critical. Vague goals, incomplete assessments, lack of appropriate services, or failure to implement the IEP as written are frequent sources of parent-school disputes. If the document is flawed or ignored, the child’s right to an appropriate education is compromised.
The IEP Team: Roles and Responsibilities
IDEA specifies who must be part of the IEP team. This team is responsible for developing, reviewing, and revising the child’s IEP. The required members are:
- The Parents of the Child: Parents are essential and equal members of the team
- Regular Education Teacher: At least one regular education teacher of the child (if the child participates in regular education)
- Special Education Teacher/Provider: At least one special education teacher or provider
- Representative of the Local Education Agency (LEA): This individual must be qualified to provide or supervise special education, knowledgeable about the general education curriculum, and knowledgeable about the LEA’s resources. This person must also have authority to commit agency resources.
- Individual Who Can Interpret Evaluation Results: This person explains the instructional implications of evaluation results (this role may be filled by another required member)
- Other Individuals: At the discretion of the parent or agency, others who have knowledge or special expertise regarding the child
- The Child: Whenever appropriate, the child with a disability should attend, especially when discussing transition services
Parents are equal partners in the IEP process. Their input, concerns, and knowledge about their child are invaluable and must be considered by the team. Parents know their child best and are the only constant members of the team throughout the child’s education.
IDEA includes rules about team member attendance. A required member may be excused from attending an IEP meeting only if:
- The parent and LEA agree in writing that the member’s attendance isn’t necessary because their area isn’t being discussed, OR
- If the member’s area is being discussed, both the parent and LEA consent in writing to the excusal, AND the member submits written input into the IEP’s development before the meeting
The structure and functioning of the IEP team itself can be a source of conflict. When parents feel devalued, unheard, or overpowered due to an imbalance of knowledge or resources, collaboration breaks down. If the school predetermines the child’s placement or services before the meeting, or if key team members are missing or excused without proper procedure, the integrity of the IEP process is compromised, increasing the likelihood of disputes.
Know Your Rights: Procedural Safeguards Under IDEA
IDEA includes a set of rights and protections for parents and children called “procedural safeguards.” Understanding these safeguards is crucial when disagreements arise.
What Are Procedural Safeguards?
Procedural safeguards are rules set forth in IDEA designed to protect the rights of parents and their child with a disability. They ensure that parents have the information and opportunity to participate fully in the special education process and provide specific mechanisms for resolving disputes between families and schools.
Schools are required to provide parents with a written explanation of these safeguards, known as the Procedural Safeguards Notice, at least once per school year. A copy must also be given upon:
- Initial referral or parental request for evaluation
- Receipt of the first state complaint in a school year
- Receipt of the first due process complaint in a school year
- A disciplinary decision constituting a change in placement
- A parent’s request for a copy
This notice must be written in language understandable to the general public and provided in the parent’s native language or other mode of communication, unless it is clearly not feasible to do so. If the parent’s language is not written, the school must translate the notice orally or by other means and document this effort.
The Procedural Safeguards Notice must fully explain rights related to:
- Independent Educational Evaluations (IEEs)
- Prior Written Notice (PWN)
- Parental Consent
- Access to Educational Records
- Dispute Resolution Options (State Complaint, Due Process Complaint/Hearing, Mediation)
- The child’s placement during dispute proceedings (“Stay Put”)
- Placement in Interim Alternative Educational Settings for discipline
- Unilateral placement by parents in private schools at public expense
- Civil actions, including time limits
- Attorneys’ fees
The Center for Parent Information and Resources (CPIR) offers helpful, user-friendly summaries of these rights on their website.
Right to Meaningful Participation
Parents have the fundamental right to participate in meetings concerning their child’s identification, evaluation, educational placement, and the provision of FAPE. Schools must make reasonable efforts to ensure parents can attend meetings and understand the proceedings, including providing interpreters for parents who are deaf or whose native language is not English, at no cost to the parent.
Denying parents the opportunity for meaningful participation is a serious procedural violation under IDEA. If parents cannot understand the discussion due to language barriers or if their input is ignored or trivialized, the collaborative intent of the law is undermined. This breakdown can lead to the development of an inappropriate IEP and is a common reason for disputes.
Right to Prior Written Notice (PWN)
Prior Written Notice (PWN) is a critical safeguard ensuring parents are informed about school decisions. It is a formal written explanation that the school district must provide to parents a reasonable time before it proposes or refuses to initiate or change the identification, evaluation, educational placement, or provision of FAPE. This notice allows parents time to consider the proposed action or refusal and respond before it takes effect. It is more than just meeting minutes; it’s the formal documentation of a decision.
PWN is required in numerous situations, such as when the school:
- Proposes to conduct an initial evaluation or reevaluation
- Refuses a parent’s request for an evaluation (including an IEE)
- Proposes or refuses to change the child’s eligibility category
- Proposes or refuses a specific educational placement
- Proposes or refuses to change the child’s placement or services in the IEP
- Refuses a parent’s request regarding educational services
- Proposes to graduate the child with a regular diploma
- Proposes to change placement due to discipline
PWN is generally not required for actions like general screenings, teacher assignments, minor schedule changes, or routine progress monitoring.
The content of the PWN is specified by IDEA and must include:
- A description of the action the school proposes or refuses to take
- An explanation of why the school is proposing or refusing the action
- A description of each evaluation procedure, assessment, record, or report the school used as a basis for the decision
- A statement that parents have protections under procedural safeguards and information on how to obtain a copy
- Sources for parents to contact for help understanding IDEA provisions
- A description of any other options the IEP team considered and the reasons why those options were rejected
- A description of other factors relevant to the school’s proposal or refusal
Like the Procedural Safeguards Notice, PWN must be provided in the parent’s native language or other mode of communication, if feasible.
PWN serves as a powerful tool for parents. Even if a decision is discussed verbally, parents can request PWN to get the school’s official position and reasoning in writing. This creates a formal record and requires the school to justify its decision based on data and evaluations, rather than opinion. An inadequate or missing PWN is a common procedural error that can strengthen a parent’s case in a dispute.
Right to Parental Consent
Under IDEA, “consent” means that the parent has been fully informed (in their native language, if feasible), understands the activity for which consent is sought, agrees in writing, and understands that granting consent is voluntary and may be revoked at any time.
Parental written consent is specifically required before the school can:
- Conduct an initial evaluation to determine eligibility for special education
- Conduct a reevaluation (though consent may not be required if the school can demonstrate it took reasonable measures to obtain consent and the parent failed to respond)
- Provide special education and related services for the first time
In some states (like Virginia), consent may also be required for changes to IEP services, cessation of services (except graduation), accessing public benefits/insurance, or inviting transition agencies to meetings.
Parents have the right to refuse consent for an initial evaluation or the initial provision of services. If a parent refuses consent for initial services, the school cannot use mediation or due process to override the refusal, and the school is not considered to be violating its FAPE obligation. If a parent refuses consent for an initial evaluation, the school may, but is not required to, pursue mediation or due process to seek an order for the evaluation.
Parents also have the right to revoke their consent for the continued provision of special education and related services at any time. This revocation must be in writing. Once written revocation is received, the school must provide PWN indicating when services will stop and then cease all special education and related services. The school cannot use mediation or due process to challenge the parent’s revocation.
Revoking consent has significant consequences. The child is no longer considered a student with a disability under IDEA and loses all rights and protections associated with it. This includes:
- The right to FAPE and an IEP
- Protections under IDEA’s discipline procedures (e.g., manifestation determination reviews)
- Eligibility for modified graduation requirements or staying in school until age 21/22
- Accommodations on standardized tests beyond those available to general education students
Revocation applies to all special education and related services; parents cannot pick and choose which services to stop. If parents later decide the child needs special education again, they must request a new initial evaluation, and the school will determine eligibility based on current information.
While revoking consent is a parental right, it should not be used as a strategy to express disagreement with only part of an IEP, given the profound impact of losing all IDEA protections.
Right to Access Educational Records
Parents have a right under both IDEA and the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) to access their child’s educational records. This includes the right to:
- Inspect and Review: Examine all educational records collected, maintained, or used by the school related to the child’s identification, evaluation, placement, and FAPE
- Receive Explanations: Obtain explanations and interpretations of the records from the school upon reasonable request
- Timely Access: Access records without unnecessary delay, before any IEP meeting or hearing, and within 45 days of the request
- Obtain Copies: Request copies of records if not having them would effectively prevent the parent from inspecting and reviewing them
- Have a Representative Review: Authorize a representative to inspect and review records
- Request Amendment: Ask the school to amend information in the records that the parent believes is inaccurate, misleading, or violates the child’s privacy or other rights
- Hearing on Record Amendment: If the school refuses to amend the record, the parent has the right to a hearing to challenge the information
Accessing and reviewing educational records is fundamental for parents to be informed participants in the IEP process and to effectively advocate during disagreements. These records contain the evaluations, IEPs, progress reports, and communications that form the basis of the school’s decisions. Reviewing records allows parents to verify information, identify discrepancies, track progress, understand the school’s rationale, and gather crucial evidence needed to support their position in any dispute.
Right to Request an Independent Educational Evaluation (IEE)
If parents disagree with an evaluation conducted by the school district, they have the right under IDEA to request an Independent Educational Evaluation (IEE) at public expense. An IEE is an evaluation conducted by a qualified professional who is not employed by the school district responsible for the child’s education. It provides parents with a “second opinion” regarding their child’s needs.
Key aspects of the IEE process include:
Trigger: The right to request an IEE at public expense arises when a parent disagrees with an evaluation obtained by the public agency. This disagreement can stem from concerns about the evaluation’s accuracy, completeness, or methodology. Parents may, but are not required to, explain their reasons for disagreement.
School’s Response: Upon receiving a parent’s request for an IEE at public expense, the school district must, without unnecessary delay, either:
- Agree to pay for the IEE
- File for due process to demonstrate that its own evaluation was appropriate
The school cannot simply refuse the request or ignore it. The timeframe for response is typically short, often interpreted as 7-10 school days or within 30 calendar days, depending on state guidance, though IDEA itself only says “without unnecessary delay”.
Parent’s Choice of Evaluator: The parent has the right to select the independent evaluator. The school must provide parents with information about where an IEE may be obtained and the agency’s criteria (e.g., location, qualifications, reasonable cost). The school may provide a list of evaluators meeting its criteria, but parents are not obligated to choose from that list. Parents can choose another qualified evaluator who meets the school’s criteria.
Scope of IEE: An IEE is not limited to academic or cognitive skills; it can cover any area related to the child’s suspected disability and educational needs, such as behavior, sensory processing, motor skills, assistive technology, etc.
Consideration of Results: If an IEE is conducted (whether at public or private expense), the school district must consider the results in any decisions made regarding the provision of FAPE to the child. The IEP team must review the IEE report. While the school must consider the IEE, it is not obligated to accept all findings or implement all recommendations.
Frequency: Parents are generally entitled to only one IEE at public expense each time the public agency conducts an evaluation with which the parent disagrees. Parents can always obtain an IEE at their own expense.
The IEE provides a crucial mechanism for parents to challenge the school’s assessment data, which is the foundation upon which the IEP is built. An independent perspective can identify needs the school may have overlooked, offer different interpretations of data, or recommend alternative strategies or services.
When Disagreements Arise: Steps You Can Take
Disagreements are a normal part of the IEP process. Knowing the steps to take, from informal communication to formal procedures, can help parents navigate these challenges effectively.
Common Points of Disagreement
Parents and schools may disagree on various aspects of a child’s special education program. Common areas of conflict include:
- Eligibility: Whether the child qualifies for special education services under IDEA
- Evaluations: The appropriateness, accuracy, or completeness of the school’s evaluations, or the refusal to conduct certain assessments
- IEP Goals: Whether goals are appropriate, ambitious enough, measurable, or aligned with the child’s needs
- Services: The type, amount, frequency, or duration of special education and related services offered or refused
- Accommodations/Modifications: The appropriateness or implementation of supports needed to access the curriculum
- Placement/LRE: Where the child will receive services and the extent of their participation with nondisabled peers
- Progress: Whether the child is making sufficient progress toward their IEP goals
- IEP Implementation: Failure by the school to provide the services, accommodations, or supports exactly as written in the IEP
- Behavior and Discipline: The school’s response to the child’s behavior, including disciplinary actions and the development/implementation of Behavior Intervention Plans (BIPs)
- Transition Services: Adequacy of planning and services for life after high school
These disagreements often arise from underlying issues such as differing perspectives on the child’s needs or abilities, communication breakdowns, lack of trust between parents and school staff, perceived resource limitations, or feelings of being devalued in the process.
Informal Resolution – Communication and Negotiation
Before resorting to formal measures, IDEA encourages parents and schools to try resolving disagreements informally through communication and negotiation. This approach is often faster, less costly, and crucial for preserving the ongoing working relationship necessary for the child’s success.
Strategies for Informal Resolution:
Communicate Clearly and Respectfully
Initiate conversations with the relevant school staff (teacher, case manager, principal). Express concerns calmly and factually. While phone calls can be useful, follow up important conversations with emails to create a written record.
Request an IEP Meeting
Parents have the right to request an IEP meeting at any time to discuss concerns about the IEP or the child’s progress. Submit the request in writing. The school typically must hold the meeting within 30 days.
Prepare Thoroughly for Meetings
- Organize: Gather relevant documents (evaluations, IEPs, progress reports, work samples, communication logs)
- Clarify Goals: Define specific concerns and desired outcomes. Focus on facts and data
- Set Agenda: Create a list of points to discuss and consider sharing it beforehand
- Brainstorm Solutions: Think creatively about solutions. Focus on the child’s underlying needs rather than just fixed demands
- Consider School’s View: Try to understand the school’s perspective, constraints, and concerns
Negotiate Effectively During Meetings
- Maintain Collaboration: Aim for a respectful, problem-solving atmosphere
- Listen Actively: Hear the school’s points and ask clarifying questions
- Document Discussions: Ensure agreements and disagreements are noted. If a request is denied, ask for the denial and reason to be documented in the meeting notes or PWN
- Explore Compromises: Consider trial periods for services or placements to gather more data
- Signing the IEP: Parents do not have to sign the IEP immediately. They can take it home to review. They can sign indicating attendance only, or sign agreement with specific parts while noting disagreement with others, potentially adding written objections directly on the IEP document
Follow Up in Writing
After meetings or important conversations, send a polite letter or email summarizing what was discussed, any agreements reached, outstanding disagreements, and agreed-upon next steps. This creates a crucial paper trail.
Consider IEP Facilitation (FIEP)
If communication is particularly strained, inquire if the state or district offers IEP facilitation. This voluntary process uses a neutral third party to guide the meeting, improve communication, and help the team reach consensus. It’s offered at no cost where available, but requires agreement from both the parent and the school. FIEP is not mandated by IDEA, so availability varies.
Effective informal resolution hinges on parental preparation and strategic communication. Given the inherent power imbalance that can exist between parents and school systems, parents who are well-organized, document their concerns clearly, understand the school’s viewpoint, and approach negotiations collaboratively are better positioned to influence outcomes positively without immediately escalating to more adversarial formal processes.
Understanding “Stay Put”: Protecting Your Child’s Current Placement
A critical procedural safeguard under IDEA is the “Stay Put” provision, also known as pendency. This rule generally requires a child with a disability to remain in their then-current educational placement while formal dispute resolution proceedings (specifically, due process hearings and any subsequent appeals) are ongoing, unless the parents and the school district agree otherwise.
What is the “Then-Current Educational Placement”?
This term isn’t explicitly defined in IDEA but is generally interpreted to mean the educational program and services outlined in the last IEP that was agreed upon and implemented before the dispute arose. It refers to the overall educational arrangement, including the type and intensity of services, rather than just the physical school building. A significant change to the program (like removing a 1:1 aide) could be considered a change in placement, even if the location stays the same. It’s important to note that decisions made by a hearing officer during the dispute can potentially alter the stay-put placement.
When Does Stay Put Apply?
Stay Put is automatically triggered when a parent or school district files a due process complaint to initiate a formal hearing. It generally does not apply during informal negotiations, IEP meetings, state complaint investigations, or mediation, although some states might have laws that extend it to mediation.
Purpose of Stay Put
The primary purpose is to provide stability and consistency for the child during potentially lengthy dispute resolution proceedings. It prevents the school district from unilaterally changing the child’s placement or services while the disagreement is being formally adjudicated.
Exceptions to Stay Put
- Agreement: Parents and the school can mutually agree to a different placement during the dispute
- Discipline: For specific serious offenses involving weapons, illegal drugs, or serious bodily injury, the school can remove the student to an Interim Alternative Educational Setting for up to 45 school days, regardless of whether the behavior was a manifestation of the disability and even if the parent files for due process
- Initial Admission/Transition: Stay Put does not apply if the dispute involves initial admission to public school or a child transitioning from early intervention services who is seeking initial services
Strategic Considerations
Stay Put can be a powerful tool for parents seeking to prevent an unwanted change proposed by the school (e.g., a move to a more restrictive setting, reduction in services, or graduation). Filing for due process invokes Stay Put, maintaining the current program while the dispute is resolved. However, it’s a double-edged sword: if the “then-current placement” is one the parent believes is inappropriate, Stay Put will maintain that placement until the dispute is resolved or the parties agree otherwise.
The direct link between Stay Put protection and the formal due process system creates a significant challenge. While Stay Put offers vital stability for the child, accessing it requires initiating due process, which can be costly, time-consuming, and emotionally taxing.
Formal Dispute Resolution Options Under IDEA
When informal attempts to resolve disagreements are unsuccessful, IDEA provides three formal dispute resolution mechanisms: Mediation, State Complaints, and Due Process Hearings. Understanding the differences between these options is crucial for choosing the most appropriate path.
Choosing Your Path: An Overview
Selecting the right formal dispute resolution method depends on various factors, including the specific nature of the disagreement, the desired outcome, the state of the relationship between the parents and the school, and the resources the parents can commit.
The Center for Appropriate Dispute Resolution in Special Education (CADRE) provides resources comparing these options.
Here’s a summary of key differences:
| Feature | Mediation | State Complaint | Due Process Hearing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who Initiates? | Parent or School (must be voluntary for both) | Any Individual or Organization | Parent or School District |
| Voluntary? | Yes (Both parties must agree) | No (SEA must investigate valid complaints) | No (Hearing proceeds if requested and not resolved/waived) |
| Typical Timeline | Scheduled timely; often resolves faster than other options | 60 calendar days for SEA decision (extensions possible) | 45 calendar days for decision after 30-day resolution period ends |
| Cost to Parent | None for mediator; potential attorney/advocate fees | None for investigation; potential advocate fees | Potentially high attorney & expert fees; possible fee recovery if prevail |
| Confidential? | Yes (Discussions cannot be used later) | No (Decision may be public, redacted) | No (Hearing record is official) |
| Decision Maker | The Parties (Parents & School) | State Education Agency (SEA) Investigator | Impartial Hearing Officer (IHO) / Admin. Law Judge (ALJ) |
| Binding? | Yes, written agreement enforceable in court | Yes, SEA decision includes corrective actions | Yes, IHO/ALJ decision legally binding |
| Stay Put Trigger? | No (Generally) | No | Yes |
| Appealable? | Agreement generally not appealable (enforceable) | Generally No (depends on state law); can file due process | Yes (to State/Federal Court) |
| Key Pro | Collaborative, preserves relationships, faster, parties control outcome | Less formal/costly than DP, State investigates, addresses systemic issues | Legally binding decision by neutral officer, triggers Stay Put, full legal rights |
| Key Con | School can refuse, no guaranteed outcome, may take time | Investigator decides, limited appeal, not necessarily collaborative | Adversarial, costly, time-consuming, stressful, burden of proof issues |
Option 1: Mediation
Mediation is a voluntary process where parents and school personnel meet with a qualified, impartial mediator to resolve disagreements concerning any matter under IDEA, including identification, evaluation, placement, and FAPE.
Key Features:
Voluntary
Both the parent and the school district must agree to participate. Mediation cannot be used to deny or delay a parent’s right to a due process hearing.
Impartial Mediator
The process is guided by a qualified, trained, and impartial mediator who is knowledgeable about special education law but is not an employee of the SEA or the LEA involved in the dispute. The state maintains a list and selects mediators impartially. The mediator facilitates communication and negotiation but does not make decisions for the parties.
Confidential
Discussions held during mediation are confidential and cannot be used as evidence in any subsequent due process hearing or civil proceeding.
No Cost
The state must bear the cost of the mediation process; it is free for parents and schools.
Convenient and Timely
Sessions must be scheduled in a timely manner and held at a location convenient to the parties.
Written Agreement
If the parties reach an agreement, it must be put in a written, legally binding document signed by the parent and an LEA representative with authority to bind the agency. This agreement is enforceable in state or federal court.
Pros and Cons
Mediation is often preferred because it is less adversarial than a hearing, can be faster and less expensive, helps preserve the parent-school relationship, and allows the parties to control the outcome. Studies and state reports suggest mediation is often successful in resolving disputes. However, because it’s voluntary, the school can decline to participate. There’s also no guarantee an agreement will be reached, and complex issues might require multiple sessions.
How to Request
Procedures vary by state. Parents typically contact their SEA’s dispute resolution office or their local school district to inquire about or request mediation.
Preparing for Mediation
Effective preparation increases the chances of a successful outcome. Key steps include:
- Organize Documents: Gather and organize all relevant records
- List and Prioritize Concerns: Clearly identify the issues in dispute and rank them by importance
- Define Desired Outcomes: Determine the best possible outcome and acceptable compromises for each issue
- Brainstorm Solutions: Think creatively about potential solutions before the meeting
- Anticipate Questions: Consider what the school might ask and prepare responses
- Prepare an Opening Statement: Briefly outlining concerns and desired outcomes can be helpful
- Decide Attendees: Determine if an advocate, attorney, or the child will attend
- Maintain a Collaborative Mindset: Be prepared to listen respectfully and be open to alternative solutions
Option 2: Filing a State Complaint
A state complaint is a formal written statement submitted to the State Education Agency (SEA) alleging that a school district or other public agency has violated a requirement of IDEA Part B or its implementing regulations.
Key Features:
Who Can File
Any individual or organization, including those from out-of-state, can file a state complaint. This differs from due process, which can only be filed by parents or the school district.
Timeline
The alleged violation must have occurred not more than one year prior to the date the SEA receives the complaint. The SEA must investigate and issue a written decision within 60 calendar days of receiving the complaint, unless specific extensions apply.
Issues Addressed
State complaints can address any alleged violation of IDEA Part B or its regulations. This includes procedural violations and potentially substantive issues related to FAPE, though due process is often seen as more appropriate for complex FAPE disputes. State complaints can also address systemic issues affecting multiple students.
Required Content
The written, signed complaint must include:
- A statement that a public agency violated IDEA Part B
- The facts supporting the allegation(s)
- Signature and contact information of the complainant
- If alleging violations regarding a specific child: child’s name and address, name of the school, description of the problem including facts, and a proposed resolution (if known)
Filing
The complainant must send a copy of the complaint to the LEA or public agency serving the child at the same time it is filed with the SEA. Supporting documents should be included.
Investigation and Decision
The SEA must adopt procedures to resolve the complaint. This typically involves:
- Giving the complainant an opportunity to submit additional information
- Providing the public agency an opportunity to respond
- Conducting an independent on-site investigation if necessary
- Reviewing all relevant information
- Making an independent determination of compliance or noncompliance
- Issuing a written decision addressing each allegation, including findings of fact, conclusions, reasons, and any required corrective actions
Appeal
IDEA does not provide a federal right to appeal an SEA’s state complaint decision. Whether an appeal is possible depends on state law or procedures. If the issue is also eligible for due process and the timeline hasn’t expired, a parent could potentially file for due process after an unfavorable state complaint decision.
Pros and Cons
State complaints offer a less formal and less expensive route than due process. The SEA conducts the investigation, relieving the complainant of some burden of proof development. It’s accessible to a wider range of parties and can address systemic violations. The 60-day timeline provides relatively quick resolution. However, the decision is made by a state investigator, not a judge, and appeal options are limited or non-existent in many states. The process doesn’t inherently foster collaboration, and lacks formal discovery or hearing procedures.
Preparing to File a State Complaint
Key steps include:
- Identify Violation(s): Clearly state which IDEA requirement(s) were allegedly violated within the past year
- Gather Facts & Evidence: Collect all relevant documents that support the factual basis of the complaint
- Describe the Problem & Impact: Explain the situation clearly and how the alleged violation affected the child
- Propose a Resolution: State what corrective actions are being sought
- Use State Form (Optional): Check the SEA website for a model complaint form
- Include All Required Content: Double-check that the complaint includes all necessary elements
- Sign and Date: Ensure the complaint is signed
- Send Copies: Mail or deliver the signed complaint to the designated SEA office and send a copy to the superintendent or special education director of the involved school district/agency
Option 3: Requesting a Due Process Hearing
A due process hearing is the most formal dispute resolution mechanism under IDEA. It is an administrative legal proceeding, similar to a court trial, where an impartial hearing officer or administrative law judge hears evidence and makes a legally binding decision to resolve a dispute.
Key Features:
Who Can File
Only a parent (or adult student) or the public agency (school district/LEA) can file a due process complaint.
Timeline for Filing
Generally, the complaint must be filed within two years of the date the party knew or should have known about the action forming the basis of the complaint. States may have different statutes of limitations, but not shorter than IDEA’s. Exceptions exist if the school misrepresented that the issue was resolved or withheld required information.
Issues Addressed
Due process specifically addresses disagreements relating to the identification, evaluation, educational placement of a child with a disability, or the provision of FAPE. It is best suited for substantive disputes requiring evidence and legal argument.
Filing the Complaint
A written complaint must be filed with the SEA and sent to the other party. It must contain specific information: child’s name, address, school; description of the problem and supporting facts; and a proposed resolution.
Our articles make government information more accessible. Please consult a qualified professional for financial, legal, or health advice specific to your circumstances.
