Inside the Pentagon’s Power Center: How the Office of the Secretary of Defense Works

Last updated 4 months ago. Our resources are updated regularly but please keep in mind that links, programs, policies, and contact information do change.

The civilian nerve center that controls America’s $840 billion military machine operates more like a Fortune 500 headquarters than a traditional government bureaucracy.

The Corporate Command Structure

The Office of the Secretary of Defense isn’t just another government agency—it’s the executive headquarters for the world’s largest employer. With over 2.8 million personnel spanning 160 countries, the Pentagon requires the same kind of sophisticated management structure that runs multinational corporations.

Think of OSD as the White House staff for America’s military. Just as the President needs the Executive Office to manage the federal government, the Secretary of Defense needs OSD to control an organization that dwarfs most Fortune 500 companies in size, complexity, and global reach.

The legal foundation for OSD is codified in federal law, specifically Title 10, Section 131 of the U.S. Code. This isn’t bureaucratic accident—it’s deliberate design based on the fundamental American principle of civilian control over the military.

Federal law explicitly prohibits creating a military general staff within OSD, ensuring that policy and oversight remain firmly in civilian hands. This structure forces a productive tension between military expertise and civilian judgment that has shaped American defense policy for over 75 years.

OSD’s core mission involves developing defense policy, strategic planning, managing the massive Pentagon budget, and evaluating countless programs across the military enterprise. Each function requires specialized expertise and institutional independence to prevent the kind of groupthink that can prove catastrophic in national security.

The Top Two: CEO and COO of Defense

Secretary of Defense: The Military’s CEO

The Secretary of Defense serves as the Pentagon’s chief executive, appointed by the President with Senate confirmation. By law, the Secretary is the “principal assistant to the President in all matters relating to the Department of Defense.”

The current Secretary of Defense is Pete Hegseth, the 29th person to hold this position. The official Secretary website provides current information about the role and its occupant.

Federal law mandates strict civilian control through specific requirements. The Secretary must be appointed from civilian life, with mandatory “cooling-off” periods for former military officers. Those who served below general or flag officer rank must wait seven years after leaving active duty, while those at general/flag officer level must wait ten years.

This requirement ensures the department’s ultimate leader brings civilian perspective distinct from purely military viewpoints. It prevents the kind of military dominance over policy that could undermine democratic governance.

Deputy Secretary: The Pentagon’s COO

The Deputy Secretary of Defense functions as the Pentagon’s chief operating officer, holding the second-highest position in the department and first in line of succession. Like the Secretary, the Deputy is a civilian presidential appointee requiring Senate confirmation.

The current Deputy Secretary is Steve Feinberg, the 36th person to hold this position. The official Deputy Secretary website contains additional information about the role.

Federal law delegates to the Deputy Secretary “full power and authority to act for the Secretary of Defense” on any matters, creating immense influence and responsibility. This isn’t ceremonial backup—it’s essential operational structure for managing the Pentagon’s scale.

The Secretary-Deputy relationship mirrors the CEO-COO dynamic in major corporations. The Secretary focuses on broad strategic direction, presidential advising, international diplomacy, and representing the department at the highest government levels like the National Security Council.

Meanwhile, the Deputy handles day-to-day business operations, with primary focus on managing the massive defense budget and overseeing internal processes that keep the institution running. This division allows the Pentagon’s top leadership to handle immense workloads in parallel rather than creating bottlenecks.

The powerful COO role was established in 1949, just two years after the department’s creation, when it became clear that a single Secretary couldn’t manage both the administrative burden and intense inter-service rivalries of the post-World War II military establishment.

The Inner Circle: Principal Staff Assistants

Reporting directly to the Secretary and Deputy Secretary is a cadre of senior civilian advisors known as Principal Staff Assistants. These officials head major functional areas within OSD, each overseeing vast responsibility portfolios.

The PSA designation grants these leaders direct advisory access to the SecDef and DepSecDef, placing them at the heart of departmental decision-making. The most senior PSAs, including Under Secretaries of Defense, key Directors, and the General Counsel, are Presidentially Appointed, Senate-Confirmed officials—a rigorous vetting process that underscores their authority and ensures congressional oversight.

OSD Leadership Structure

The Pentagon’s Chief Technology Officer

Research and Engineering Leadership

The Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering serves as the Pentagon’s Chief Technology Officer. The office’s website reflects its mission to drive innovation and advance technology ensuring U.S. military maintains decisive technological advantages over potential adversaries.

This office was intentionally designed with a culture embracing calculated risk. Congressional guidance explicitly stated expectations that the USD(R&E) would “take risks, press the technology envelope, test and experiment, and have the latitude to fail, as appropriate” in pursuing breakthrough capabilities.

The USD(R&E) establishes policies for and supervises all Pentagon research, engineering, technology development, prototyping, and experimentation activities. This includes developing overarching technology strategy and unifying research efforts across the entire department.

Critical Technology Focus Areas

The office concentrates on technology areas essential for future warfare, including artificial intelligence, hypersonic weapons, directed energy, and quantum computing. These aren’t distant possibilities—they’re current priority investments shaping near-term military capabilities.

A key role involves fostering the “defense innovation ecosystem” by building bridges between the Pentagon and non-traditional partners in industry, academia, and small businesses. This breaks the traditional pattern of relying solely on established defense contractors.

Advanced Technology Organizations

The USD(R&E) provides oversight for some of the nation’s most advanced technology organizations:

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA): The Pentagon’s central research organization for high-risk, high-reward projects aiming for revolutionary technological breakthroughs.

Missile Defense Agency (MDA): Responsible for developing, testing, and fielding layered ballistic missile defense systems protecting the United States and allies.

Defense Innovation Unit (DIU): Tasked with accelerating adoption of leading commercial technology into the military to solve national security problems.

Space Development Agency (SDA): Responsible for developing and fielding next-generation military space capabilities.

Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC): The central repository for research and engineering information across the Pentagon.

The Pentagon’s Chief Acquisition Officer

Cradle-to-Grave System Management

The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment manages the entire lifecycle of military systems from purchase to retirement. The office’s website describes its mission to “Enable the Delivery and Sustainment of Secure, Resilient, and Preeminent Capabilities to the Warfighter and International Partners Quickly and Cost Effectively.”

If the military buys it, uses it, or maintains it, the USD(A&S) establishes the policies governing those activities. This encompasses everything from aircraft carriers to individual soldier equipment.

The USD(A&S) serves as the Defense Acquisition Executive, supervising performance of the entire Pentagon acquisition system. This includes procurement of all major weapon systems and oversight of the complex processes that turn taxpayer dollars into military capabilities.

Logistics and Industrial Base

Beyond acquisition, the office establishes policies for logistics, maintenance, and supply chain management to “protect and sustain the force” anywhere in the world. This ensures troops have necessary equipment and supplies to operate effectively in any environment.

A critical function involves ensuring health, security, and resilience of the U.S. defense industrial base—the vast network of companies designing and building military equipment. This includes publishing the National Defense Industrial Strategy to guide long-term investments and priorities.

The USD(A&S) also oversees management of all Pentagon properties and installations, including military housing, energy resilience, and environmental compliance. Additionally, the office handles Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Defense Programs countering weapons of mass destruction threats.

The Innovation-Production Divide

The separation of the former Under Secretary for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics into two distinct offices—USD(R&E) and USD(A&S)—was a deliberate structural reform mandated by Congress in the FY2017 National Defense Authorization Act.

This wasn’t simple bureaucratic reshuffling but a calculated move to create productive tension at the heart of Pentagon modernization. The goal was fostering two different, sometimes conflicting cultures: high-risk, fail-fast innovation within R&E, and disciplined, risk-averse large-scale production and global sustainment within A&S.

The language describing the offices reflects this intent. USD(R&E) is encouraged to “press the technology envelope” and given “latitude to fail”—terminology more suited to venture capital than traditional government agencies. In contrast, USD(A&S) focuses on “delivery and sustainment” of capabilities “at speed and scale”—the language of global manufacturing and logistics corporations.

This structure intentionally creates the “valley of death”—the challenging transition of promising technology from laboratory prototype under R&E’s purview to fully funded, manufactured, and fielded weapon system managed by A&S. Success of the entire defense modernization effort hinges on these two Under Secretaries building strong, cooperative bridges across that valley.

The Pentagon’s Chief Strategy Officer

Policy and International Relations

The Under Secretary of Defense for Policy serves as principal advisor to the Secretary of Defense on all matters related to national security and defense policy formulation, strategic planning, and international defense relationship management. The office’s website describes its role as the Pentagon’s internal strategy group and defense-focused state department.

The USD(P) has lead responsibility for developing the National Defense Strategy, the department’s foundational strategic document. It also produces the annual Defense Planning Guidance, which translates strategy into concrete instructions for military services building their budgets.

Regional and Functional Expertise

The office manages Pentagon defense relationships with foreign countries and international organizations like NATO. It’s organized with regional sub-offices focused on specific world areas, including the Indo-Pacific, Europe, and the Middle East.

USD(P) develops defense policy for critical functional domains including space, cyberspace, homeland defense, and special operations. The office also reviews campaign plans developed by military combatant commands to ensure consistency with national policy and strategy.

The USD(P) oversees several Assistant Secretaries of Defense for regional and functional portfolios, the Defense Security Cooperation Agency managing foreign military sales, and the Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency providing accounting for missing personnel.

The Pentagon’s Chief Human Capital Officer

Managing the Total Force

The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness serves as the Pentagon’s Chief Human Capital Officer. The office’s website describes its mission to ensure a “strong, adaptable, and ready force supported through exceptional policy, programs, and services.”

This office handles the “people” side of the Defense Department—a massive undertaking given that the Pentagon is the nation’s largest employer with over 2.8 million total personnel.

USD(P&R) develops and oversees policies for the entire “Total Force,” including active duty service members, National Guard and Reserves, and Pentagon civilian employees. This covers recruiting and retention, compensation, benefits, and diversity and inclusion initiatives.

Health and Readiness

The office ensures military units are properly trained, manned, and prepared for deployment and combat operations. USD(P&R) oversees the entire Military Health System and Defense Health Agency, providing healthcare to nearly 9.5 million eligible beneficiaries including service members, retirees, and families.

USD(P&R) develops and manages critical programs aimed at force well-being, including suicide prevention, sexual assault prevention and response, and wide-ranging military community and family support programs.

Key components include Assistant Secretaries for Health Affairs, Manpower & Reserve Affairs, and Readiness, plus the Defense Human Resources Activity and Defense Commissary Agency operating worldwide grocery stores for military personnel and families.

The Pentagon’s Chief Financial Officer

Managing the Massive Budget

The Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller)/Chief Financial Officer serves as principal advisor to the Secretary of Defense on all budgetary and fiscal matters. The office’s website reflects responsibility for formulation, management, and financial accountability of the entire Pentagon budget exceeding $840 billion annually.

The Comptroller supervises preparation of the Pentagon’s massive annual budget request submitted to the President’s Office of Management and Budget and defended before Congress. Once Congress appropriates funds, the Comptroller oversees budget execution across the department.

Financial Management and Accountability

The office establishes and supervises all financial management and accounting policies and systems for the Pentagon, ensuring principles and procedures for spending and collecting funds are followed correctly.

A major, congressionally mandated priority involves leading the department-wide effort to achieve and maintain a “clean” or unmodified financial audit opinion. This includes overseeing the department’s financial improvement and audit remediation plan.

The Comptroller’s office serves as primary Pentagon contact on all fiscal matters with OMB and powerful congressional appropriations and budget committees.

The Comptroller exercises authority over the Defense Finance and Accounting Service—often described as the world’s largest finance and accounting operation responsible for paying all Pentagon military and civilian personnel, retirees, and contractors—and the Defense Contract Audit Agency providing crucial audit and financial advisory services for government contracts.

The Pentagon’s Chief Intelligence Officer

Intelligence and Security Leadership

The Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security serves as principal advisor to the Secretary of Defense on all intelligence, counterintelligence, security, and sensitive activities. The office’s website describes its role providing policy, planning, and strategic oversight for the entire Defense Intelligence and Security Enterprise.

This enterprise constitutes a significant portion of the overall U.S. Intelligence Community in terms of both personnel and budget, making the USD(I&S) one of the most powerful intelligence officials in the government.

The USD(I&S) exercises the Secretary of Defense’s authority over major Defense Agencies and Pentagon Field Activities that are intelligence components. The office develops defense intelligence policy and integrates Pentagon intelligence efforts with the broader Intelligence Community, coordinating closely with the Director of National Intelligence.

Program Management and Security

The USD(I&S) serves as Program Executive for the Military Intelligence Program, managing its budget through the Pentagon’s formal Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution process.

The office provides strategic direction and oversight for all Pentagon security programs, including personnel security (background investigations and security clearance adjudications) and industrial security (protecting classified information held by defense contractors).

Major Intelligence Agencies

The USD(I&S) provides direct oversight to the nation’s largest and most technologically advanced intelligence agencies:

Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA): The premier source of all-source military intelligence for the Pentagon and the nation.

National Security Agency (NSA): The nation’s cryptologic organization responsible for signals intelligence and cybersecurity.

National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA): Provides geospatial intelligence from satellite and aerial imagery.

National Reconnaissance Office (NRO): Designs, builds, and operates the nation’s reconnaissance satellites.

Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA): Conducts background investigations for security clearances and provides security oversight for cleared industry partners.

Independent Voices: The Pentagon’s Internal Watchdogs

Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation

The Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation provides the Pentagon with “timely, insightful and unbiased analysis on resource allocation and cost estimation problems.” CAPE functions as the Pentagon’s internal, independent think tank.

The director reports directly to the Secretary of Defense, ensuring major decisions are informed by rigorous, data-driven analysis separate from military service or program office advocacy.

CAPE is statutorily required to conduct Independent Cost Estimates for all Major Defense Acquisition Programs. These estimates provide senior leaders and Congress with realistic assessments of full lifecycle costs for new weapon systems, often differing from more optimistic projections of program advocates.

During the Pentagon’s budget process, CAPE analysts scrutinize budget proposals submitted by military services, evaluate their alignment with defense strategy, and propose alternatives to the Secretary of Defense.

Before the Pentagon commits to new major programs, CAPE guides and evaluates Analysis of Alternatives studies ensuring different potential solutions to military problems are fairly considered.

Operational Test and Evaluation

The Director of Operational Test and Evaluation serves as senior advisor to the Secretary of Defense on all operational and live-fire testing of military systems. The office’s website describes DOT&E as acting like an independent “Consumer Reports” for the military.

The core mission ensures weapon systems are rigorously tested and proven operationally effective, suitable for combat, and survivable before the department decides to buy them in large quantities.

DOT&E prescribes Pentagon-wide policies and procedures for all operational testing and live-fire testing. The office reviews and must approve test plan adequacy for all major acquisition programs before testing can proceed.

After testing completion, DOT&E independently analyzes results and reports directly to the Secretary of Defense and Congress. This report assessing system combat readiness is a critical legal prerequisite before programs can proceed to full-rate production.

Institutional Checks and Balances

The Pentagon structure deliberately includes powerful, independent offices like CAPE and DOT&E whose primary function is serving as the “conscience of the department” by challenging assumptions and plans of the larger bureaucracy.

Their creation by Congress—DOT&E in 1983 and CAPE’s predecessor in the 2009 Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act—was direct response to historical problems of massive cost overruns and fielding weapon systems that failed in combat.

Their power stems from statutory independence and direct reporting lines. CAPE’s director reports directly to the Secretary of Defense, and DOT&E’s director reports directly to both the Secretary and Congress.

This gives them institutional authority to deliver potentially unwelcome news—that prized programs are too expensive or new weapons failed tests—without fear of reprisal from organizations they’re evaluating.

This structure creates vital checks and balances within the executive branch itself. While military services advocate for their programs, CAPE advocates for taxpayers’ dollars, and DOT&E advocates for warfighters who will depend on equipment in battle.

The Pentagon’s Chief Legal Officer

The General Counsel serves as the Pentagon’s chief legal officer, appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. The office’s website describes its role providing binding legal advice to the Secretary of Defense, Deputy Secretary, and all of OSD on the full spectrum of legal issues confronting the department.

The GC advises on domestic and international legal frameworks governing military and intelligence operations, including laws of armed conflict. The Office of the General Counsel represents the Pentagon in litigation and oversees all legal challenges against the department.

The GC provides legal guidance on fiscal law, environmental regulations, personnel matters, and government contracting rules applying across the entire Pentagon. The General Counsel also serves as Director of the Defense Legal Services Agency, composed of legal staffs assigned to various Defense Agencies and Pentagon Field Activities, ensuring legal consistency across support components.

OSD’s Complex Relationships

The Military Advice System

The relationship between civilian OSD and uniformed Joint Chiefs of Staff sits at the heart of American civil-military relations. Pentagon Directive 5100.01 mandates that OSD and the JCS are “separately identified and organized” but “shall function in full coordination and cooperation.”

The critical distinction lies in their roles. The JCS, led by its Chairman, are by law the “principal military advisers” to the President, Secretary of Defense, and National Security Council. They provide expert advice on military feasibility and risks associated with various courses of action.

However, the landmark Goldwater-Nichols Act of 1986 explicitly removed the JCS from the operational chain of command. They don’t command troops. In contrast, OSD, acting for the Secretary of Defense, exercises executive authority over policy, resource allocation, and program oversight.

Simply put, OSD often determines the “what” (policy) and “how much” (resources), while the JCS advises on the “how” (military execution).

Service Department Oversight

The Military Departments—Army, Navy (including Marine Corps), and Air Force (including Space Force)—constitute the administrative chain of command. Their primary responsibility is to “organize, train, and equip” their respective forces, with each department led by a civilian Secretary reporting to the Secretary of Defense.

OSD’s role resembles corporate headquarters providing department-wide policy and oversight to major “business lines” (the services). The USD(P&R) sets personnel policies all services must follow, and USD(A&S) establishes acquisition rules for how all services buy equipment.

OSD ensures individual Army, Navy, and Air Force efforts align with overall Pentagon strategy and priorities. Sometimes the Secretary of Defense formally designates one Military Department as Pentagon Executive Agent for specific functions serving the entire department, with OSD Principal Staff Assistants providing policy oversight.

Combatant Command Support

The relationship with Combatant Commands highlights the second, most critical chain of command. The operational chain runs directly from President to Secretary of Defense, then from Secretary directly to Commanders of Combatant Commands like U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, U.S. Central Command, and U.S. European Command.

OSD isn’t in this direct operational chain. Instead, OSD’s role involves supporting combatant commands through policy and resources. USD(P) develops overarching policy guiding combatant commander campaign plans. USD(A&S) ensures combatant commands have logistical support, supplies, and equipment needed to execute plans. USD(I&S) provides required intelligence support.

OSD provides the “ways and means” enabling combatant commands to achieve military “ends.” The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs acts as transmission channel for orders from President and Secretary to combatant commands but isn’t himself in the command chain.

The Two Chains of Command

Defense Agency Management

Finally, OSD provides direct oversight and management for a vast array of Defense Agencies and Pentagon Field Activities. These organizations were created to provide shared services and supplies common to all military branches, gaining efficiency and economy of scale.

This places OSD in the role of corporate headquarters not just for military services but for a sprawling network of enabling organizations. The Defense Logistics Agency reports through USD(A&S), the Defense Health Agency reports through USD(P&R), and the Defense Intelligence Agency reports through USD(I&S).

This oversight function is a primary mechanism through which OSD exercises authority and control over the entire defense enterprise, ensuring that support functions align with strategic priorities and operate efficiently across service boundaries.

The Civilian Control Model

The Office of the Secretary of Defense represents the practical implementation of civilian control over the military—one of America’s founding principles. This isn’t just theoretical constitutional law but daily operational reality affecting how the world’s most powerful military makes decisions.

The structure creates productive tension between civilian judgment and military expertise. Civilian leaders bring broader perspective on national priorities, political feasibility, and resource constraints. Military leaders provide professional expertise on operational requirements, tactical realities, and strategic risks.

This tension prevents both civilian micromanagement of military operations and military dominance over policy decisions. The system works because it recognizes that effective defense requires both civilian oversight and military professionalism, each contributing essential capabilities to national security.

The OSD structure has evolved over decades of trial and error, learning from failures and adapting to new challenges. Today’s organization reflects lessons from World War II, the Cold War, and post-9/11 conflicts about how to balance civilian control with military effectiveness.

As new domains like cyber and space create fresh challenges, and emerging technologies like artificial intelligence reshape warfare, OSD continues adapting to ensure American military power serves democratic governance rather than replacing it.

Our articles make government information more accessible. Please consult a qualified professional for financial, legal, or health advice specific to your circumstances.