Last updated 3 months ago. Our resources are updated regularly but please keep in mind that links, programs, policies, and contact information do change.
A patent protects an invention. A copyright protects an original artistic or literary work.
A trademark protects brand names and logos. It trademark is the cornerstone of a brand’s identity in the marketplace. It can be a word, phrase, symbol, design, or any combination that identifies the source of goods or services and distinguishes them from competitors.
If you invent a new type of vacuum cleaner, a patent would protect the invention itself, a trademark would protect the brand name you sell it under, and a copyright could protect the TV commercial you create to market it.
The Spectrum of Distinctiveness
Not all trademarks are created equal. The legal power of a mark—its ability to be registered, protected, and defended against infringers—is determined by its strength. This strength is measured along a framework known as the “Spectrum of Distinctiveness,” a concept central to U.S. trademark law.
The Abercrombie Spectrum
The Spectrum of Distinctiveness is the primary framework used by the USPTO and federal courts to classify how effectively a mark identifies a single source. This spectrum, often called the “Abercrombie Spectrum” after the landmark 1976 court case Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. Hunting World, categorizes marks into five main types, ranging from highly protectable to completely unprotectable.
A mark’s position on this spectrum dictates its registrability, the breadth of its legal protection, and the ease with which its owner can stop others from using it. The core principle is that the more distinctive a mark is, the stronger its legal standing.
The choice of where a mark falls on this spectrum represents a fundamental business decision. It’s a strategic calculation that balances immediate marketing needs against long-term legal defensibility requirements.
A startup with a limited marketing budget might opt for a more descriptive name because it requires less effort to explain the product to consumers. In doing so, they accept the future legal risk and potential expense of having to prove their mark has become a brand in the public’s mind.
Conversely, a well-funded corporation launching a major product may deliberately select a completely made-up name. This company plans to invest heavily in marketing to build brand recognition from the ground up, aiming to create a powerful, highly defensible legal asset that can provide competitive advantage for decades.
Inherently Distinctive Marks
Marks at the strong end of the spectrum are considered “inherently distinctive.” They can immediately identify a product’s source without any need for public education first. They’re eligible for registration on the USPTO’s Principal Register, the primary federal registry for trademarks, from the moment they’re used in commerce.
Fanciful Marks (Strongest)
A fanciful mark is an invented word, created for the sole purpose of functioning as a trademark. These words have no other meaning in the language.
These are completely made-up terms that are inherently distinctive because their only association is with the product or service they represent. Well-known fanciful marks include KODAK® for cameras, PEPSI® for soft drinks, XEROX® for copiers, and EXXON® for petroleum.
Fanciful marks receive the broadest and strongest legal protection possible. Because they’re entirely unique, any unauthorized use on similar products is highly likely to be considered infringement.
Arbitrary Marks (Very Strong)
An arbitrary mark consists of a real, common word that has no logical connection to the goods or services it identifies. These are existing words applied in an unexpected or unrelated context. Their strength comes from the disconnect between the word’s original meaning and its new commercial application.
The most famous example is APPLE® for computers. While the word “apple” is generic for the fruit, it’s completely arbitrary when applied to electronics. Other examples include CAMEL® for cigarettes and AMAZON® for online retail services.
Like fanciful marks, arbitrary marks are highly protectable. Their established meaning in one context makes their use in another highly distinctive.
Suggestive Marks (Strong)
A suggestive mark hints at or suggests a quality, ingredient, or characteristic of the goods or services, but requires a degree of imagination, thought, or perception for the consumer to make the connection.
These marks don’t directly describe the product; they require a mental leap. This element of imagination is what makes them inherently distinctive. NETFLIX® suggests movies (“flicks”) delivered over the internet. COPPERTONE® suggests a copper-colored tan from a sun-tanning product. MICROSOFT® suggests software for microcomputers.
Suggestive marks are considered strong and are popular business choices. They offer a good balance, providing a high level of legal protection while giving a marketing hint about the product’s nature.
Weaker Marks
Descriptive Marks (Weak)
A descriptive mark directly describes a feature, quality, characteristic, function, or geographic origin of the goods or services. Because they simply describe, they’re not considered inherently distinctive.
These terms immediately convey information about the product rather than identifying its source. “CREAMY” for yogurt, “APPLE PIE” for potpourri, and “BED & BREAKFAST REGISTRY” for lodging reservation services are all descriptive.
The distinction between a descriptive and a suggestive mark can be subtle but is legally critical. For a sun-tanning product, the mark COPPERTONE® is suggestive because it requires imagination. However, the mark “BRONZER” for the same product would be descriptive because it immediately describes the product’s function.
The Path to Protection: Secondary Meaning
A descriptive mark, while initially weak, can become a legally protectable trademark if it achieves “acquired distinctiveness,” also known as “secondary meaning.” This occurs when, through extensive and exclusive use in the marketplace, the public comes to associate that descriptive term with a single source or brand, rather than just the product category itself.
The legal mechanism for claiming this status is Section 2(f) of the federal Lanham Act. An applicant can file a §2(f) claim, often by providing evidence of five years of continuous and exclusive use of the mark in commerce. However, five years of use alone isn’t always sufficient, especially for highly descriptive terms.
The applicant bears the burden of proving that secondary meaning has been achieved. This evidence can include:
- High sales figures and advertising expenditures
- Consumer surveys demonstrating that the public views the term as a brand
- Unsolicited media coverage and reviews
- Deliberate “look for” advertising campaigns that train consumers to associate the term with a specific company
Examples of descriptive marks that successfully gained protection through secondary meaning include AMERICAN AIRLINES® for airline services and BABY BRIE® for a small-sized cheese.
Unprotectable Marks
Generic Terms
At the weakest end of the spectrum are generic terms. A generic term is the common, everyday name for a type of good or service and can never function as a trademark.
These words are the very definition of the product category and must remain available for all competitors to use freely. It’s impossible to trademark “BICYCLE” for bicycles, “BAGEL SHOP” for a bagel shop, or “E-TICKET” for electronic ticketing services.
Genericide: When Strong Marks Die
In a process known as “genericide,” a once-strong trademark can become so famous and widely used as the name for the entire product category that it loses its trademark status and becomes generic. This is a brand owner’s worst nightmare.
Examples of former trademarks that have become generic terms in the U.S. include ASPIRIN, CELLOPHANE, ESCALATOR, YO-YO, LAUNDROMAT, and DRY ICE.
| Category | Strength | Definition | Example | Registrability Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fanciful | Strongest | An invented word with no prior meaning | KODAK® for cameras | Inherently Distinctive |
| Arbitrary | Very Strong | A real word used in a context unrelated to its meaning | APPLE® for computers | Inherently Distinctive |
| Suggestive | Strong | A word that hints at a product’s quality, requiring imagination | NETFLIX® for streaming | Inherently Distinctive |
| Descriptive | Weak | A word that directly describes a product’s quality or function | CREAMY for yogurt | Requires Proof of Secondary Meaning |
| Generic | Unprotectable | The common name for the product or service itself | BICYCLE for bicycles | Cannot be Registered |
Standard vs. Special Form Marks
When applying for a trademark for a word or logo, every applicant must make a fundamental choice about the format of the mark. This choice determines the scope of protection the registration will provide.
Standard Character Marks
A standard character mark registration provides the broadest possible protection for the words, letters, or numbers of a mark. It does so without claiming any particular font, style, size, or color.
This format protects the word or phrase itself, regardless of how it’s visually displayed. The registrations for “Coca-Cola” in plain text, “Under Armour,” and the slogan “Just do it” are all standard character marks.
This is powerful protection. It prevents a competitor from using a confusingly similar word or phrase simply by rendering it in a different font or color scheme and claiming that their mark is visually distinct.
Special Form (Design) Marks
A special form mark, also known as a design or stylized mark, protects a mark that has a specific visual appearance, such as a unique stylization, a logo, or a design element.
With this format, the protection is for the way the mark looks. It’s ideal when the visual aspect of the brand is a key identifier for consumers. The iconic McDonald’s Golden Arches logo, the Nike “swoosh” design, and the name “Coca-Cola” written in its famous, flowing script are all protected as special form marks.
This format is crucial for protecting the visual equity a brand builds over time. The look of a logo can become just as famous and valuable as the name itself.
Comprehensive Protection Strategy
The decision to register a mark in both standard character and special form formats isn’t redundant—it’s a sophisticated and layered legal strategy designed to create comprehensive brand protection. This “portfolio” approach builds a legal “moat” around the brand, providing multiple, independent grounds for enforcement.
The Coca-Cola Company, for example, has registrations for “Coca-Cola” as a standard character mark, its script logo as a special form mark, and the unique shape of its bottle as trade dress. This multi-layered defense allows them to address different types of infringement.
If a competitor sold a beverage called “Koka-Kola” in a generic font, the standard character registration would be the primary enforcement tool. If another competitor sold a drink called “Fizzy-Pop” but used a script font confusingly similar to Coca-Cola’s, the special form registration would be key.
Effective trademark strategy isn’t about choosing one “best” type of protection, but about anticipating how competitors might try to trade on a brand’s goodwill and proactively building legal shields to block each avenue.
Specialized Types of Marks
The trademark system extends far beyond simple brand names and logos. It includes several specialized types of marks designed to serve unique functions in the economy, such as identifying services, signaling membership in a group, certifying standards, and protecting a product’s overall appearance.
Trademarks vs. Service Marks
The distinction between a trademark and a service mark is simple but critical for proper registration. A trademark is used in connection with tangible goods or products, while a service mark is used in connection with services, which are activities performed for others. The term “trademark” is often used colloquially to refer to both.
The key question is: What does the customer purchase? If they buy a physical product that bears the mark, it’s a trademark. If they hire someone to perform an activity, it’s a service mark.
The USPTO considers a service to be a real activity performed for the benefit of someone other than the applicant, such as banking, dry cleaning, transportation, or legal counsel.
Before a mark is federally registered, its owner can use the “TM” symbol for trademarks on goods and the “SM” symbol for service marks. After successful federal registration with the USPTO, the ® symbol may be used for both registered trademarks and service marks.
Collective Marks
A collective mark is owned by a collective organization, such as an association, cooperative, or union, but is used by the members of that organization to identify themselves as part of the group. The owner of the mark (the collective) must exercise control over its use by the members to ensure it’s used properly.
There are two distinct types of collective marks:
Collective Trademark/Service Mark: This type is used by members of the collective to identify their own goods or services and to distinguish them from those of non-members. The mark REALTORS® is owned by the National Association of Realtors and is used by its member real estate agents to identify their brokerage services.
Collective Membership Mark: This type is used by members for the sole purpose of indicating that they have membership in the organization. It doesn’t identify the source of any goods or services. The letters “AAA” inside an oval on a member’s car indicate membership in the American Automobile Association. Similarly, a sorority’s Greek letters worn on a jacket or a union’s logo on a member’s card are collective membership marks.
Certification Marks
A certification mark is a unique type of mark used to certify that goods or services provided by various independent persons or businesses have met certain standards.
The most important feature of a certification mark is that its owner—the certifying body—doesn’t sell the goods or provide the services that bear the mark. The owner’s role is simply to set the standards and authorize others who meet those standards to use the mark. This is a key difference from all other types of marks.
An LG® dishwasher may bear both the LG® trademark, which identifies the source (LG Electronics), and the ENERGY STAR® certification mark, which certifies that the product meets energy efficiency standards set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Three Types of Certification:
Geographic Origin: Certifies that a product originates from a specific geographical region. Examples include “Certified Genuine Idaho Potatoes®” and “NEW YORK STATE GROWN & CERTIFIED”.
Quality, Materials, or Manufacturing Standards: Certifies that a product meets certain standards of quality, safety, or production methods. The most well-known examples are the ENERGY STAR® logo for energy efficiency and the “UL” mark from Underwriters Laboratories for product safety testing.
Work/Labor Standards: Certifies that work was performed by a member of a specific organization (like a union) or that a professional has met certain competency standards. An example is the “FLORIDA REGISTERED PARALEGAL FRP” mark, which indicates a paralegal has met standards set by the Florida State Bar.
These specialized marks reveal that the trademark system serves a broader purpose than just protecting corporate brands. It provides legal frameworks that allow industries to organize (collective marks) and build consumer trust through verifiable, independent standards (certification marks).
In a complex marketplace where consumers often face an information imbalance, certification marks act as powerful signals of quality, safety, or origin. They function as a form of “delegated regulation,” allowing industries to self-organize and enforce standards, which in turn empowers consumers to make more informed purchasing decisions.
| Mark Type | Primary Purpose | Who Owns It? | Who Uses It? | Key Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademark/Service Mark | Indicates the commercial source of a product or service | The company selling the product/service | The owner | NIKE® |
| Collective Mark | Indicates membership in a group or origin from a member | The collective organization (e.g., association, union) | The members of the collective | REALTORS® |
| Certification Mark | Certifies that a product or service meets a specific standard | The independent certifying body | Authorized third parties who meet the standard | ENERGY STAR® |
Trade Dress
Trade dress refers to the total image and overall appearance of a product or its packaging. It protects the “look and feel” that identifies the source of the product to consumers.
Two Types of Trade Dress:
Product Packaging: This includes the dressing, packaging, and labeling of a product. It can be inherently distinctive. A well-known example is the unique purple and gold drawstring bag used for Crown Royal® whisky.
Product Design/Configuration: This refers to the shape or design of the product itself. Product design can never be inherently distinctive and always requires proof of acquired secondary meaning to be protected. The most famous example is the iconic contour shape of the Coca-Cola® bottle.
The Functionality Barrier
A critical limitation on trade dress protection is the doctrine of functionality. A feature cannot be protected as trade dress if it’s functional—that is, if it’s essential to the use or purpose of the product or if it affects the product’s cost or quality.
Non-Traditional Trademarks
The scope of what can be a trademark extends beyond words and images to engage the other senses. The Lanham Act, the primary federal trademark statute, defines a trademark broadly enough to include anything that is perceivable by the senses and can function as a source identifier. These are known as non-traditional trademarks.
Beyond Sight
Sound Marks: A recognizable sound can be a powerful brand identifier. Registered sound marks include the three-note NBC chimes, the roar of the MGM lion, the “Tarzan yell,” and the sound of the AFLAC duck quacking the company’s name.
Scent Marks: A distinct scent can also be trademarked, though it’s less common. Examples include the “sweet, slightly musky, vanilla fragrance” of Play-Doh® modeling compound and a registered bubble gum scent for sandals.
Color Marks: A specific color or combination of colors can function as a trademark. However, color can never be inherently distinctive and always requires proof of acquired secondary meaning. Famous color marks include the “robin’s egg blue” associated with Tiffany & Co.® boxes, the brown color of UPS® delivery trucks and uniforms, and the pink of Owens-Corning® fiberglass insulation.
Other Novel Marks: The frontier of trademark law also includes motion marks (like the animated NBC peacock), touch marks, and even taste marks, though the latter are extremely rare due to the functionality doctrine.
Registration Challenges
Registering a non-traditional trademark is challenging due to two significant legal hurdles: distinctiveness and functionality.
The Distinctiveness Hurdle: Many non-traditional marks are not considered inherently distinctive. Color, scent, and product design marks always require a strong showing of acquired distinctiveness to be registered on the Principal Register. While sound and motion marks can be inherently distinctive, the bar is high.
The Functionality Doctrine: The most formidable obstacle is the functionality doctrine. A feature cannot be trademarked if it’s functional—meaning it’s essential to the use or purpose of the product or affects its cost or quality. This is an absolute bar to registration, regardless of how much secondary meaning a feature has acquired.
A pleasant flavor for a food product would almost certainly be deemed functional because the taste is essential to the product’s purpose.
The functionality doctrine serves as a critical gatekeeper that maintains the boundary between trademark law and patent law. Patent law grants a powerful, exclusive monopoly on a useful invention, but only for a limited time (typically 20 years). Trademark protection, by contrast, can last indefinitely as long as the mark is used in commerce.
If a company could trademark a functional feature, it would effectively gain a patent that never expires, stifling competition and innovation. The functionality doctrine prevents this by ensuring that once a patent on a useful design expires, that design becomes part of the public domain, free for all competitors to use.
The Classification System
The USPTO manages millions of registered and pending trademarks. To make this vast database searchable and manageable, it uses a highly organized classification system. Understanding this system is practical and necessary for anyone looking to search for or register a trademark.
Goods and Services
A core principle of trademark law is that rights are not granted for a word or symbol in a vacuum. A trademark is always connected to the specific goods or services with which it’s used. When filing an application, an applicant must clearly identify these goods or services.
Attempting to register a mark for goods or services that the applicant doesn’t actually use (or have a bona fide intent to use in the near future) can result in the rejection of the application or the later cancellation of the registration.
The Nice Classification System
To organize the universe of goods and services, the USPTO uses an international system called the “Nice Classification” (named after the city of Nice, France, where it was established by treaty). This system divides all goods and services into 45 distinct classes: 34 classes for goods and 11 for services.
This classification system serves several key functions. It helps the USPTO (and the public) search its database for potentially conflicting marks, and it’s used to calculate application fees, which are charged on a per-class basis.
The class system is fundamental to understanding the concept of “likelihood of confusion,” which is the primary reason the USPTO refuses to register a mark. Two companies can often use the exact same trademark for unrelated products without causing consumer confusion because their goods or services fall into different classes.
DELTA® is a registered trademark for faucets (Class 11) and also for airline services (Class 39). PANDORA® is used for jewelry (Class 14) and for music streaming services (Class 41). Because the products are so different, consumers aren’t likely to believe they come from the same source.
Design Search Codes
For special form or design marks, a simple word search isn’t enough. The USPTO uses a numerical system called the “Design Search Code Manual” to categorize the visual elements of logos.
Every significant design element in a logo is assigned a six-digit code. A logo featuring an eagle would be coded under category 03 (Animals), division 15 (Birds and bats), and section 01 (Eagles).
This system allows a USPTO examining attorney, or a member of the public conducting a search, to find all registered logos that contain a specific design element, such as an eagle, a star, or a crown, regardless of the brand name associated with it. This is a crucial tool for conducting a thorough clearance search to ensure a new logo isn’t confusingly similar to an existing one.
Our articles make government information more accessible. Please consult a qualified professional for financial, legal, or health advice specific to your circumstances.
