The NIST Cybersecurity Framework: A Guide for U.S. Businesses

Last updated 3 months ago. Our resources are updated regularly but please keep in mind that links, programs, policies, and contact information do change.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework is a voluntary set of guidelines, standards, and best practices designed to help any organization—regardless of its size, sector, or level of cybersecurity maturity—better understand, manage, and reduce its cybersecurity risks.

It provides a common language and systematic methodology for managing risks, enabling organizations to develop a robust and risk-based security program.

Origins and Evolution

The framework’s origins trace back to a direct presidential mandate. On February 12, 2013, President Barack Obama signed Executive Order 13636, “Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity”. The order’s primary goal was to enhance the security and resilience of the nation’s critical infrastructure—sectors like energy, finance, and healthcare—in the face of growing cyber threats.

The order tasked NIST, a non-regulatory federal agency within the Department of Commerce, with developing the framework. NIST was selected for this role because it serves as an unbiased source of scientific data and practices and has a long history of successfully fostering collaboration between government, industry, and academia to address critical national issues. This collaborative approach was deemed essential for the framework’s success and broad adoption.

Framework Versions

The CSF is a “living document,” intentionally designed to be refined and improved over time to keep pace with evolving technology and threat trends. The first version, CSF 1.0, was released in February 2014 after a year-long collaborative development process involving extensive public input. It was updated to version 1.1 in 2018.

The most significant evolution came with the publication of CSF 2.0 on February 26, 2024. This latest version expanded the framework’s scope beyond its original focus. Reflecting this broader applicability, the official title was changed from the “Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity” to simply “The NIST Cybersecurity Framework”. This change underscores its value and relevance to all organizations, not just those designated as critical infrastructure.

Strategic Approach

The decision to have a non-regulatory agency like NIST lead the CSF’s development was deliberate and pivotal. The objective was to encourage voluntary adoption by the private sector, which has historically been resistant to prescriptive, top-down regulatory mandates.

By positioning the CSF as guidance from a respected, consensus-building scientific body rather than a set of rules from an enforcement agency, the government successfully fostered a partnership built on trust. This strategy leveraged NIST’s reputation and collaborative model, making the framework a product of public-private cooperation rather than a government imposition.

This foundational decision is a primary reason for the CSF’s widespread domestic and international success; it has become a globally recognized “gold standard” through its demonstrated value and adaptability, not through regulatory force.

Why Your Business Should Adopt the CSF

Adopting the NIST Cybersecurity Framework is far more than a technical compliance exercise or an IT-centric project; it’s a strategic business decision that delivers tangible value across the entire enterprise. The framework’s core strength lies in its ability to translate complex technical security concepts into the language of business risk, enabling better decision-making, communication, and resource allocation.

Better Risk Management

The CSF provides a structured, repeatable process for organizations to identify, assess, prioritize, and manage their cybersecurity risks in the specific context of their business objectives, mission, and established risk tolerance. It guides organizations in moving away from a purely reactive, ad-hoc security posture—where incidents are dealt with as they occur—toward a proactive, risk-informed approach that anticipates and mitigates threats before they cause harm.

This systematic process helps determine which activities are most important to protect critical operations and service delivery, ensuring that security efforts are focused where they matter most.

Improved Communication

One of the most significant benefits of the CSF is its role as a “common language” for cybersecurity. It bridges the communication gap that often exists between technical teams and non-technical stakeholders, including senior executives, board members, legal counsel, and auditors.

By using the framework’s clear, outcome-based taxonomy, an IT leader can articulate the organization’s cybersecurity posture, justify investment needs, and explain risk levels in terms that a board of directors can understand and act upon. This shared understanding fosters more effective, risk-aware decisions at the highest levels of the organization.

Meeting Compliance Requirements

While use of the CSF is officially voluntary for most organizations, it has become an essential tool for demonstrating due care and meeting a wide range of compliance requirements. The framework aligns with numerous industry-specific regulations, such as those in the finance and healthcare sectors, as well as international standards.

For businesses that work with the U.S. federal government, adherence is often not optional. The Department of Defense, for example, mandates that its contractors comply with NIST Special Publication 800-171 to protect Controlled Unclassified Information, and the CSF provides the foundational approach for achieving and managing this compliance.

Market Reality

The term “voluntary” has become increasingly nuanced. Market forces, supply chain pressures, and regulatory expectations have created a state of de facto obligation for a vast and growing number of businesses. The CSF is now the widely accepted baseline for demonstrating responsible cybersecurity management.

For many organizations, especially those in federal supply chains or regulated industries, ignoring the framework is no longer a viable option, as it can lead to lost contracts, increased regulatory scrutiny, and a significant competitive disadvantage. This is underscored by the fact that other governments, such as the United Kingdom, are now mapping their own governance codes to the NIST CSF, further cementing its status as a global benchmark.

Customer Trust and Competitive Advantage

In today’s digital economy, customers are acutely aware of data security and prioritize it when choosing products and services. Adhering to the NIST CSF sends a powerful message to the market that an organization is committed to safeguarding customer information.

This demonstrated dedication to security builds brand reputation, strengthens customer trust, and can serve as a powerful business differentiator that drives long-term growth and loyalty.

Optimizing Security Investment

The CSF provides a strategic lens through which organizations can analyze and optimize their cybersecurity spending. By using the framework’s functions, a business can assess its investment balance—for example, evaluating if it is over-investing in “Protect” technologies while under-investing in “Detect” and “Respond” capabilities.

The gap analysis performed using CSF Profiles allows businesses to identify areas of redundant spending, discover critical gaps in coverage, and create a data-driven action plan. This ensures that investments are prioritized based on risk, maximizing the impact and value of every dollar spent on cybersecurity.

Framework Structure

To effectively implement the NIST CSF, an organization must first understand its structure. The framework is composed of four main components that work in concert: the Framework Core, Implementation Tiers, Framework Profiles, and Informative References. Together, these elements provide a comprehensive system for organizing, measuring, and improving an organization’s cybersecurity posture.

The Framework Core: Six Functions

The Framework Core is the heart of the CSF. It’s a taxonomy of high-level cybersecurity activities and desired outcomes, organized into a hierarchy of Functions, Categories, and Subcategories. The Core does not provide a prescriptive “how-to” guide for implementation; rather, it presents a comprehensive list of “what” an organization should be able to do to manage its cybersecurity risk effectively.

With the release of CSF 2.0, the Core is now organized around six key functions.

The New Govern Function

The most significant change in CSF 2.0 was the introduction of the Govern function. This addition elevates the importance of cybersecurity governance, explicitly framing it as an enterprise-wide risk management responsibility that is integral to an organization’s overall strategy, not just an IT function.

The Govern function encompasses how an organization makes and executes decisions regarding its cybersecurity strategy. This includes establishing and monitoring policies, understanding roles and responsibilities, and overseeing cybersecurity supply chain risk management.

The Five Core Functions

The Govern function is complemented by the five original functions, which represent the complete lifecycle of cybersecurity risk management:

Identify

This function is focused on developing an organizational understanding of the cybersecurity risks to systems, people, assets, data, and capabilities. To effectively manage risk, an organization must first know what it needs to protect and what threats it faces.

Key activities include inventorying physical and software assets (asset management), understanding the business context and role in the supply chain (business environment), and performing risk assessments to identify vulnerabilities and threats.

Protect

This function outlines the appropriate safeguards to ensure the delivery of critical services and to limit or contain the impact of a potential cybersecurity event. It’s focused on proactive defense.

Categories within this function include implementing identity management and access control to limit system access to authorized users, conducting awareness and training for employees, implementing data security measures like encryption to protect information confidentiality and integrity, and deploying protective technology like firewalls and antivirus software.

Detect

This function defines the activities needed to identify the occurrence of a cybersecurity event in a timely manner. No protection is perfect, so rapid detection is critical to minimizing damage.

This involves implementing security continuous monitoring to check for anomalies and events, such as unusual network traffic or unauthorized access attempts, and establishing clear detection processes to ensure anomalous activity is properly analyzed and understood.

Respond

This function includes the activities to take action once a cybersecurity incident has been detected, with the goal of containing its impact. A swift and coordinated response is crucial.

This requires having a formal response plan, managing communications with internal and external stakeholders (including law enforcement), performing analysis to understand the scope and nature of the incident, and taking mitigation steps to eradicate the threat and prevent its expansion.

Recover

This function focuses on developing and implementing plans for resilience and restoring any capabilities or services that were impaired due to a cybersecurity incident. The goal is to support a timely return to normal operations to reduce the overall impact of an incident.

This involves having a detailed recovery plan, implementing improvements based on lessons learned, and coordinating communications with stakeholders throughout the recovery process.

Unifying Multiple Compliance Requirements

Many businesses today face a confusing and overlapping array of security requirements from different sources, such as PCI DSS for payment card data, HIPAA for health information, and CMMC for defense contracts. This often leads to siloed compliance efforts, with separate teams working on separate checklists, resulting in duplicated work and potential gaps in overall security.

The CSF, with its high-level Functions and mapping to specific controls via Informative References, can act as a strategic unifier for these disparate efforts. An organization can map all of its various compliance obligations back to the CSF Core.

For instance, a specific control required by HIPAA and another required by PCI DSS might both contribute to achieving the “Protect – Data Security” outcome in the CSF. By using the framework as a central organizing principle, a business can create a single, cohesive cybersecurity program that satisfies multiple requirements simultaneously.

This rationalizes security activities, eliminates redundant work, improves efficiency, and provides leadership with a clear, holistic view of the organization’s true security posture, rather than just a collection of disconnected compliance reports.

Table: CSF 2.0 Functions Overview

Implementation Tiers: Measuring Maturity

The CSF Implementation Tiers are a self-assessment tool used to characterize the rigor and sophistication of an organization’s cybersecurity risk management practices. It’s important to note that NIST explicitly states the Tiers are not designed to be a formal maturity model where every organization must strive for Tier 4.

Instead, they provide a benchmark to help an organization determine if its current approach is appropriate for its risk environment and to set realistic goals for improvement. The selected Tier should align with the organization’s goals, threat environment, and legal and regulatory requirements.

The Tiers describe a progression from informal, reactive responses to an approach that is agile, risk-informed, and continuously improving. Each Tier is characterized by its practices in three areas: Risk Management Process, Integrated Risk Management Program, and External Participation.

Tier 1: Partial

An organization at this level has an ad-hoc and reactive approach to cybersecurity. Risk management is informal and inconsistent, often addressed on a case-by-case basis. There is limited awareness of cybersecurity risk at the organizational level, and the organization has little to no understanding of its role in the broader ecosystem or its supply chain risks.

Tier 2: Risk-Informed

At this tier, risk management practices are approved by management but may not be established as formal, organization-wide policy. There is an awareness of cybersecurity risk, but a comprehensive, integrated approach has not been established. The organization understands its role in the ecosystem concerning either its dependencies or its dependents, but not both, and while it may receive threat intelligence, it does not typically share information outward.

Tier 3: Repeatable

The organization has formally approved risk management practices that are expressed as policy and are consistently followed across the enterprise. There is an organization-wide approach to managing cybersecurity risk, and personnel have the knowledge and skills to perform their roles. The organization understands its dependencies and dependents and actively collaborates and shares information with others in its community.

Tier 4: Adaptive

The highest tier represents an organization that adapts its cybersecurity practices based on lessons learned and predictive indicators. It has a culture of continuous improvement and actively adapts to the changing threat and technology landscape. Cybersecurity risk management is fully integrated into the organization’s culture and business decisions, and the organization actively shares information in real-time to help the broader ecosystem manage risk.

Table: Implementation Tiers Comparison

Framework Profiles: Your Strategic Roadmap

Framework Profiles are the primary tool for applying the CSF to a specific organization. A Profile represents the alignment of the Functions, Categories, and Subcategories with an organization’s unique business requirements, risk tolerance, and available resources. Profiles are used to describe both the current state and the desired target state of specific cybersecurity activities, providing a strategic roadmap for improvement.

There are two main types of Organizational Profiles an organization will create:

Current Profile

This is a snapshot of the cybersecurity outcomes that the organization is currently achieving. It documents the “as-is” state of the cybersecurity program by indicating which Categories and Subcategories from the Core are being addressed.

Target Profile

This describes the desired “to-be” state. It represents the outcomes the organization needs to achieve to meet its cybersecurity risk management goals, based on its risk appetite, business objectives, and regulatory requirements.

Gap Analysis

The true power of the Profiles emerges when they are used together. By conducting a gap analysis—a side-by-side comparison of the Current Profile and the Target Profile—an organization can clearly identify the areas where its current practices fall short of its goals.

This analysis produces a prioritized list of actions needed to bridge those gaps, forming the basis of a concrete and measurable action plan for improving the cybersecurity posture. NIST provides customizable templates to facilitate this process.

Organizations can also leverage Community Profiles, which are baseline profiles developed by communities of interest to address shared challenges, such as ransomware risk or cloud security, providing a valuable starting point for creating a Target Profile.

Informative References

Informative References are the connections between the high-level outcomes of the Framework Core and the specific, technical controls found in other standards, guidelines, and best practices. While the Core defines “what” an organization should do (e.g., protect data at rest), the Informative References point to resources that explain “how” to do it.

These references include well-known documents like NIST SP 800-53, ISO 27001, the Center for Internet Security Critical Security Controls, and COBIT. This component allows the CSF to remain high-level and flexible while providing direct pathways to detailed implementation guidance, enabling organizations to leverage the standards they already use within the strategic context of the framework.

Implementation Steps

Implementing the NIST Cybersecurity Framework is a strategic, cyclical process, not a one-time project that can be checked off a list. It requires commitment, planning, and continuous iteration. The following seven-step process, based on NIST guidance and industry best practices, provides a practical roadmap for any organization to begin its CSF journey.

Step 1: Prioritize and Scope

The first step is to set the boundaries for the implementation. An organization must define its high-level business or mission objectives and its strategic priorities. With these in mind, leaders must decide the scope of the CSF implementation.

Will it apply to the entire enterprise, a specific business unit, or a single critical system? This decision is crucial as it will define the focus of all subsequent steps. For example, a company might initially scope the project to its e-commerce platform, which handles sensitive customer data and is critical to revenue.

Step 2: Orient

Once the scope is defined, the organization must orient itself by gathering information about the environment. This involves identifying all related systems, platforms, and assets (both physical and digital) within the defined scope. A comprehensive inventory of hardware, software, and data is essential.

The organization must also identify all applicable legal and regulatory requirements, as well as the specific internal and external threats and vulnerabilities relevant to the scoped systems. This step provides the foundational context needed to create a meaningful profile.

Step 3: Create a Current Profile

With a clear understanding of the environment, the organization can now create its Current Profile. This involves assessing the current state of its cybersecurity program by mapping existing controls, policies, and procedures to the Categories and Subcategories of the CSF Core.

The goal is to produce an honest “as-is” snapshot of what cybersecurity outcomes are currently being achieved. As part of this process, the organization should also select the Implementation Tier (1-4) that best describes its current risk management practices.

Step 4: Conduct a Risk Assessment

The next step is to conduct a formal risk assessment. This process involves analyzing the operational environment to determine the likelihood that a given cybersecurity event will occur and the potential impact it would have on the organization.

The results of this risk assessment are critical inputs for the next step, as they will highlight the most significant risks that need to be addressed and help inform the creation of the Target Profile.

Step 5: Create a Target Profile

Using the results of the risk assessment, the organization now defines its desired cybersecurity outcomes by creating a Target Profile. This “to-be” state is built by selecting the CSF Categories and Subcategories that must be achieved to reduce risk to an acceptable level, as defined by the organization’s risk appetite and business goals.

The organization also selects a target Implementation Tier that reflects the desired maturity and rigor of its future risk management program.

Step 6: Analyze Gaps and Prioritize Actions

This is where the strategy takes shape. The organization compares the Current Profile with the Target Profile to identify the gaps between the “as-is” and “to-be” states. Each gap represents an area for improvement.

A prioritized list of actions is then created to address these gaps. Prioritization should be based on a cost-benefit analysis and the level of risk associated with each gap, ensuring that the most critical vulnerabilities are addressed first.

Step 7: Implement the Action Plan

The final step is to execute the prioritized action plan. This involves implementing the necessary cybersecurity controls, process improvements, and technology investments to close the identified gaps.

Throughout this process, the organization can use the CSF’s Informative References to find specific, detailed guidance from other standards (like CIS Controls or NIST SP 800-53) on how to implement the required controls.

Implementation is not the end of the journey; it’s a continuous process of monitoring progress, measuring the effectiveness of controls, and regularly updating the Current Profile to reflect improvements, thus beginning the cycle anew.

The CSF for Small Businesses

The NIST Cybersecurity Framework is intentionally designed to be scalable and is not just for large enterprises or critical infrastructure. Small and medium-sized businesses are frequent targets of cyberattacks and can derive immense value from the CSF’s structured approach to risk management.

Recognizing that SMBs often have limited budgets, staff, and time, NIST and other federal agencies provide a wealth of free resources specifically designed to make the framework accessible and actionable for this community.

Key Resources for Small Businesses

NIST’s Small Business Cybersecurity Corner

This is a dedicated online portal hosted by NIST that serves as a one-stop shop for SMBs. It contains tailored guidance, planning tools, and resources organized by sector (e.g., health, manufacturing) and topic (e.g., ransomware, phishing, cloud security). The official website provides comprehensive resources specifically for smaller organizations.

CSF 2.0 Small Business Quick Start Guide

This guide is a crucial starting point for SMBs, especially those with modest or no existing cybersecurity plans. It provides a simplified, non-technical overview of how to use the CSF to kick-start a risk management strategy.

The guide, available at the NIST CSF 2.0 Resource Center, breaks down implementation into four manageable stages: Understand, Assess, Prioritize, and Communicate.

Federal Trade Commission Guidance

The FTC offers practical, plain-language advice for SMBs on implementing the core functions of the framework. Their resources include simple checklists and actionable tips for each function (Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover), making the concepts easy to grasp and apply.

CISA’s Free Tools and Services

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency provides a catalog of free services that are highly valuable for SMBs. These include Cyber Hygiene vulnerability scanning for internet-facing systems and assessments based on CISA’s Cybersecurity Performance Goals, which are a set of foundational, high-impact security practices that all organizations should implement to reduce risk.

Voluntary vs. Mandatory Requirements

It’s critical for SMBs to understand the context of their obligations. For most small businesses, adopting the CSF is entirely voluntary. However, for SMBs operating within the Department of Defense supply chain, compliance with the more prescriptive NIST SP 800-171 standard is mandatory for protecting Controlled Unclassified Information.

The CSF provides the overarching risk management approach to help achieve and maintain this compliance.

Start Small, Build Over Time

The existence of “Quick Start Guides” and simplified FTC checklists demonstrates a key principle: for an SMB, the goal is not immediate, perfect adoption of the entire framework. The practical message from federal agencies is to start somewhere.

Many SMBs lack the resources for a full-scale implementation, and the government recognizes this reality. The simplified guidance focuses on foundational, high-impact actions often referred to as “cyber hygiene”: inventorying assets, controlling access, using antivirus software, backing up data, enabling multi-factor authentication, and training employees.

By focusing on these basics, an SMB can achieve a significant reduction in risk without a massive upfront investment. The CSF provides the long-term roadmap for maturing the security program over time, but the immediate priority is to establish a solid baseline of essential security practices.

How CSF Compares to Other Standards

The NIST Cybersecurity Framework does not exist in isolation. It’s one of several prominent frameworks and standards that organizations can use to structure and improve their security programs. Understanding how the CSF compares and contrasts with other major standards, particularly ISO 27001 and the CIS Critical Security Controls, is crucial for business leaders to make informed, strategic decisions about which approach is best suited to their organization’s needs, maturity, and goals.

NIST CSF vs. ISO 27001

The NIST CSF and ISO 27001 are often compared, as both provide comprehensive approaches to managing information security risk, but they differ fundamentally in their structure, scope, and purpose.

NIST CSF

The CSF is a flexible, outcome-based framework designed to help organizations manage cybersecurity risk. It’s not a standard that can be certified against. Its primary focus is on providing a strategic, high-level guide that is highly adaptable and can be tailored to any organization. Developed in the U.S., it’s free to access and is particularly well-suited for organizations in the early stages of developing their cybersecurity program or for those seeking a common language to communicate risk to executives.

ISO 27001

ISO 27001 is an internationally recognized standard that specifies the requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continually improving an Information Security Management System. Unlike the CSF, ISO 27001 is designed to be certifiable through formal, third-party audits.

This certification provides a powerful, independent verification of an organization’s security posture, which is often required for international business or to meet the demands of large enterprise customers. The certification process involves costs for audits and implementation support.

Complementary Approaches

The two are highly complementary. An organization that has implemented the CSF is already well on its way to meeting many of the requirements for ISO 27001, and vice versa. A common strategy is for an organization to begin by using the NIST CSF to build and structure its cybersecurity program and then, as its program matures, to implement ISO 27001 to establish a formal, certifiable ISMS.

NIST CSF vs. CIS Critical Security Controls

The NIST CSF and the CIS Controls serve different but highly synergistic purposes.

NIST CSF

The CSF is a high-level, strategic risk management framework. It answers the question, “What should our organization be able to do to manage its cybersecurity risk?” It provides the structure and goals for a security program.

CIS Controls

The CIS Controls are a prioritized, prescriptive, and highly technical set of defensive actions and safeguards. They answer the question, “How can we technically secure our systems to defend against the most common attacks?” The controls are organized into Implementation Groups to provide a clear path for organizations to follow, starting with basic cyber hygiene.

Perfect Partnership

These two frameworks work perfectly together. An organization can use the NIST CSF to define its overall risk management strategy and identify necessary outcomes (e.g., the need to achieve the outcomes in the “Protect – Access Control” category).

It can then turn to the specific, actionable CIS Controls to find the technical safeguards needed to achieve those outcomes. The CIS Controls are designed to map directly to other frameworks, including the NIST CSF, providing a practical bridge from high-level strategy to hands-on implementation.

Framework Comparison Table

Table: Major Cybersecurity Frameworks Comparison

Our articles make government information more accessible. Please consult a qualified professional for financial, legal, or health advice specific to your circumstances.