Last updated 3 months ago. Our resources are updated regularly but please keep in mind that links, programs, policies, and contact information do change.
It sounds like a riddle: Can you tax a tax?
When it comes to tariffs, the answer isn’t straightforward. A tariff is already a tax on imported goods, so asking whether it’s taxable feels circular. But for American businesses navigating the regulatory maze, this question has real financial consequences.
The confusion stems from dealing with two completely different tax systems. Federal income tax treats tariffs one way, while state sales tax handles them entirely differently. A single tariff payment can flow through both systems with totally different rules governing each path.
For federal income tax, tariffs become part of your inventory costs and can only be deducted when you sell the goods.
For state sales tax, that same tariff cost usually gets passed on to customers and becomes part of the price on which sales tax is calculated. This means consumers can end up paying tax on a tax.
Understanding Tariffs: The Foundation
Before diving into tax implications, you need to understand what tariffs actually are and how they work in practice.
What Exactly is a Tariff?
A tariff is a tax levied by a government on goods imported from another country. The terms “tariff” and “duty” are used interchangeably. In the United States, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) assesses and collects these fees at 328 ports of entry nationwide.
Tariffs once funded the entire U.S. government. Until federal income tax was permanently established in 1913, tariffs were the primary source of federal revenue. Today, their role as a money-maker has shrunk dramatically. In fiscal year 2024, the $77 billion collected from tariffs represented only about 1.57% of total federal revenue.
Modern tariffs serve three main strategic purposes:
Protecting Domestic Industries: Making imported goods more expensive encourages consumers to buy American-made alternatives. This shields local industries from foreign competition and stimulates the home economy.
Safeguarding National Security: Tariffs are imposed on goods from industries considered vital to national security—steel, aluminum, semiconductors, and pharmaceuticals. The goal is reducing reliance on foreign suppliers for critical materials.
Applying Foreign Policy Pressure: Tariffs serve as leverage in international relations. They can penalize countries for unfair trade practices like intellectual property theft or currency manipulation, or act as bargaining chips in trade negotiations.
Tariffs come in different forms. The most common is the ad valorem tariff, calculated as a percentage of the imported good’s value. Specific tariffs charge a fixed fee per unit (like $2 per shirt). Tariff-rate quotas apply higher rates only after a certain quantity has been imported.
How Tariffs Work in Practice
The Constitution grants Congress the power to “lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises” and “to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations”. Over the past century, Congress has delegated significant authority to the executive branch, allowing the President to adjust tariff rates and negotiate trade agreements.
This authority operates through specific laws:
Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 allows the President to impose tariffs on imports that threaten U.S. national security.
Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 authorizes the U.S. Trade Representative to investigate and respond to unfair foreign trade practices, including imposing retaliatory tariffs.
Recent administrations have used these authorities extensively, leading to significant tariff increases on goods from various countries, most notably China.
The collection process is systematic. When goods arrive at a U.S. port, the importer of record files entry documents with CBP. A critical step is classifying goods according to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)—a massive codebook that assigns unique classification codes to virtually every conceivable product.
This code determines the specific duty rate. Importers typically classify their own goods and declare their value. CBP reviews this information, conducts audits, and collects payment. All revenue from tariffs goes into the U.S. Treasury’s General Fund.
Who Really Pays for Tariffs?
The biggest misconception about tariffs is that exporting countries pay them. In reality, the financial transaction happens entirely within the importing country.
The direct payer of a U.S. tariff is always the U.S. importing company. This entity, known as the importer of record, is legally responsible for paying CBP. The foreign manufacturer or exporting country’s government never sends a check to the U.S. Treasury.
But identifying the direct payer tells only part of the story. The economic burden typically gets distributed among several players:
The Foreign Exporter might lower its selling price to keep products competitive despite the tariff, accepting smaller profit margins.
The U.S. Importer may absorb some tariff cost to avoid passing the full increase to customers and risk losing market share.
The U.S. Consumer most commonly bears the cost when importers pass tariff expenses through higher prices. This is why economists widely agree that tariffs function as a tax on domestic consumers.
A real-world example illustrates this dynamic. In 2009, the U.S. imposed steep tariffs on tires imported from China. While Chinese tire imports dropped 67%, American consumers paid an additional $1.1 billion for more expensive tires from domestic manufacturers or other foreign suppliers who could now charge higher prices without Chinese competition.
This distinction between the legal payer (the importer) and the ultimate cost bearer (often the consumer) is crucial for understanding tariff taxation.
Tariffs and Federal Income Tax
When it comes to federal income tax, tariff treatment follows strict accounting rules that often surprise business owners. Tariffs are ultimately deductible, but the timing and method are highly specific.
| Tax System | How Tariffs Are Treated |
|---|---|
| Federal Income Tax | Capitalized into Inventory. Tariffs are not an immediate expense. They are added to inventory cost and deducted as Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) only when inventory is sold. |
| State & Local Sales Tax | Included in the Taxable Sales Price. If a seller-importer passes tariff cost to a customer, that cost is almost always part of the total price subject to sales tax. The key exception depends on who is the “importer of record.” |
Are Tariffs a Deductible Business Expense?
The answer is a nuanced “yes.” Tariffs paid on imported goods are considered deductible business expenses, but they can’t be treated like ordinary expenses such as rent, utilities, or advertising, which are deducted in the year they’re paid.
The IRS views tariffs as a direct cost of acquiring inventory. They must be included in the total cost of that inventory.
The most dangerous mistake businesses make is expensing tariffs immediately upon payment. A company might record a $10,000 tariff payment as a “tariff expense” on its current income statement. This is incorrect under U.S. tax law and can lead to overstated expenses, understated inventory value, and underpaid income tax. If discovered during an audit, this error could result in substantial tax bills, including penalties and interest.
The UNICAP Rules: Why You Can’t Expense Tariffs Immediately
The specific regulation governing this treatment is Internal Revenue Code Section 263A, known as the Uniform Capitalization (UNICAP) rules. These rules require businesses to capitalize certain direct and indirect costs associated with producing or acquiring property for resale.
Capitalization means a cost isn’t immediately deducted as an expense. Instead, it’s added to an asset’s value on the company’s balance sheet. For importers, inventory is a primary asset. UNICAP rules mandate that all costs necessary to bring inventory to a condition and location for sale must be capitalized. This includes the purchase price, freight-in (shipping costs), and import tariffs.
Here’s a simple example:
- A U.S. company imports a machine from Germany for $100,000
- It pays $5,000 for shipping
- It pays a $10,000 tariff to CBP
Under UNICAP rules, the company can’t record a $10,000 “tariff expense.” Instead, the machine’s total cost in inventory records must be $115,000 ($100,000 + $5,000 + $10,000). This $115,000 is the capitalized asset value.
This principle applies for both financial accounting under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and tax accounting, although specific requirements for capitalizing indirect costs can sometimes differ.
From Inventory to Deduction: Cost of Goods Sold
The capitalized tariff cost doesn’t stay on the balance sheet forever. It’s deducted from revenue only when the inventory is sold through the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) calculation.
COGS is the direct cost attributable to producing or acquiring goods a company sells during a given period. When an item is sold, its capitalized cost transfers from the inventory asset account to the COGS expense account on the income statement. Only at this point is the tariff finally recognized as a deduction against revenue, reducing taxable gross profit.
Businesses required to account for inventory report their COGS calculation on IRS Form 1125-A. This form starts with beginning inventory, adds purchases and other costs (where capitalized tariffs are included), and subtracts ending inventory to arrive at the final COGS figure.
Consider a detailed scenario:
- An electronics distributor imports 1,000 headphones in Year 1
- Total purchase price: $50,000
- Tariffs paid: $12,500
- Total capitalized cost: $62,500 ($62.50 per headphone)
In Year 1, the company sells 700 headphones. Its COGS is 700 × $62.50 = $43,750. This is the deductible amount from sales revenue.
The remaining 300 headphones, with capitalized value of $18,750, stay on the balance sheet as ending inventory. The tariff portion associated with these unsold goods ($3,750) hasn’t been deducted yet. That deduction waits until those headphones are sold in a future year.
This demonstrates that federal tax treatment of tariffs is fundamentally about timing. The question isn’t if the tariff can be deducted, but when. UNICAP rules defer this business expense until revenue from corresponding inventory is recognized, significantly impacting reported taxable income and tax payments in any given year.
Tariffs and State Sales Tax
State sales tax treatment of tariffs is completely different from federal income tax rules. The core issue isn’t when a cost is deducted, but whether that cost becomes part of the price on which sales tax is calculated. This creates situations where consumers pay tax on a tax.
Are Tariffs Subject to State Sales Tax?
Generally, yes. When a seller pays a tariff on imported goods and passes that cost to the final customer, that cost is almost always considered part of the total “sales price” subject to state sales tax.
A common misconception is that if tariffs are listed as separate line items or “surcharges” on customer invoices, they can be excluded from sales tax calculation. This is incorrect in almost all states. State laws typically define taxable sales price as the total consideration paid by the purchaser to the seller.
From the state’s perspective, tariffs are simply one of many seller costs—like rent, labor, or marketing—that must be recouped for profit. These costs can’t be deducted from the selling price before calculating sales tax. New Jersey’s official guidance explicitly states that if a seller marks up prices to cover tariffs, that increased cost is subject to sales tax, “even if it is billed as a separately stated fee”.
The Decisive Factor: Who is the Importer of Record?
While the general rule seems straightforward, there’s a critical distinction that can change the outcome entirely. The key to determining sales taxability isn’t the tariff’s nature, but who is legally responsible for paying it to the federal government—the Importer of Record.
Scenario A: Seller is the Importer of Record
This is the most common arrangement. A U.S. retailer or distributor imports goods from a foreign manufacturer. The U.S. company acts as Importer of Record and is legally responsible for paying CBP. To maintain profit margins, the seller incorporates tariff costs into customer prices.
Result: The tariff cost is included in the taxable sales price. The transaction between seller and customer is a single event, and the tariff is simply part of the seller’s cost structure. The customer pays sales tax on the full price, including the recouped tariff amount.
Scenario B: Purchaser is the Importer of Record
This scenario is less common, particularly for consumer goods, but offers significant tax advantages for large business-to-business transactions. Here, the final customer arranges to be the Importer of Record, making them legally liable for paying CBP directly.
Result: The tariff cost is excluded from the sales tax base. The law views this as two separate transactions—the purchase of goods from the seller, and the payment of tariffs by the purchaser to the federal government. Since the tariff payment isn’t part of consideration paid to the seller, it’s not included in the sales price for tax purposes.
A 2020 South Carolina revenue ruling confirms this distinction, clarifying that when the purchaser is the importer and personally liable for tariffs, the cost is not part of “gross proceeds of sales” and therefore not subject to sales or use tax.
The financial impact becomes clear with an example. A business purchases machinery for $100,000 subject to a 25% tariff ($25,000). The state sales tax rate is 8%.
| Scenario | Item Price to Seller | Tariff Cost | Taxable Sales Price | Sales Tax (8%) | Total Customer Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A: Seller is Importer | $125,000 | (Included in price) | $125,000 | $10,000 | $135,000 |
| B: Purchaser is Importer | $100,000 | $25,000 (paid to CBP) | $100,000 | $8,000 | $133,000 |
| Difference | $2,000 Savings | $2,000 Savings |
By structuring the transaction so the purchaser acts as Importer of Record, the company saves $2,000 in sales tax on this single purchase.
The Ripple Effect on State Tax Compliance
Tariff impacts on state taxes extend beyond individual transaction calculations. Tariffs increase goods costs, inevitably leading to higher retail prices for consumers. This price inflation can significantly affect a business’s overall state tax compliance obligations.
Following the 2018 Supreme Court decision in South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., states can require out-of-state businesses to collect and remit sales tax if they meet certain economic activity levels—known as economic nexus. These thresholds typically involve specific sales revenue amounts (like $100,000 annually) or transaction numbers (like 200 transactions) into the state.
The connection to tariffs creates a clear chain:
- Federal government imposes new tariffs
- Business raises prices to offset tariff costs
- Company’s total sales revenue in various states increases due to higher prices, even if sales volume stays the same
- Increased revenue pushes the company over economic nexus thresholds in states where it previously had no filing obligations
- Business must now register for sales tax permits, collect taxes from customers, and file regular returns
This creates significant new administrative and compliance burdens, connecting federal trade policy directly to multi-state sales tax management complexities.
Practical Strategies for Businesses
Successfully navigating tariff tax implications requires proactive strategies across accounting, legal, and operational functions.
Accounting and Tax System Review
The first defense is ensuring internal systems correctly handle tariffs according to both federal and state rules.
For federal income tax compliance, the priority is avoiding the UNICAP trap. Businesses must work with accountants or tax advisors to confirm that enterprise resource planning (ERP) and accounting software are set up to capitalize tariffs into inventory value, not expense them immediately. This involves treating tariffs as direct product costs under IRC Section 263A’s Uniform Capitalization rules.
In an environment of rising tariffs and general inflation, businesses should evaluate their inventory valuation method. Using the Last-In, First-Out (LIFO) method, where permitted, can be advantageous. LIFO assumes the most recently acquired (and most expensive) inventory is sold first, resulting in higher Cost of Goods Sold and lower taxable income during inflationary periods.
For state sales tax compliance, focus on tax calculation engine accuracy. Sales tax software must be sophisticated enough to correctly determine tax bases for transactions involving tariffed goods. This means applying correct state-specific rules, especially those concerning Importer of Record status. Systems that simply apply sales tax to every invoice line item without considering underlying transactional structure could lead to significant overpayments.
Pricing, Contracts, and Cash Flow
Tariffs force critical decisions about pricing and contractual relationships with direct financial consequences.
A fundamental strategic decision is whether to absorb tariff costs (eroding profit margins) or pass them to customers (potentially increasing prices and reducing demand). Businesses should conduct “what-if” scenario planning to model different tariff rates and pricing strategies’ impact on profitability and market competitiveness.
A crucial proactive step is thorough contract review. Purchase and sales agreements should be scrutinized and renegotiated if necessary to explicitly define key terms. Most importantly, contracts should clearly state which party will act as Importer of Record. Defining this responsibility upfront prevents future disputes and allows parties to structure transactions in the most tax-efficient manner.
Businesses must also engage in careful cash flow planning. Higher tariffs mean higher upfront costs to acquire inventory, tying up more working capital. If tariff costs are passed to customers, higher sales prices result in larger sales tax collections per transaction, increasing money businesses must hold and remit to state authorities. These increased cash outlays must be factored into financial forecasts and budgets to ensure liquidity.
Supply Chain and Sourcing Optimization
Beyond compliance and pricing, tariffs should prompt strategic supply chain reviews.
One effective strategy is leveraging Free Trade Agreements (FTAs). The United States has FTAs with more than 20 countries. By sourcing goods from these partner countries, businesses can often import qualifying products completely free of tariffs, eliminating the entire issue.
In response to high tariffs on goods from particular nations, businesses should explore supply chain diversification. This involves identifying and vetting alternative suppliers in countries with lower or zero tariff rates. While shifting supply chains involves costs and complexities, it can provide long-term resilience against geopolitical trade disputes and tariff volatility.
Businesses shouldn’t overlook tariff engineering—detailed review of product classifications under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule. The HTSUS is incredibly complex, and a single product could potentially fall under multiple classifications with different duty rates. Ensuring goods are classified correctly under the provision with the lowest possible legal duty rate is essential.
Misclassification is common and can lead to significant duty overpayments, customs delays, and potential penalties. Consulting with customs brokers or trade attorneys can be valuable investments for ensuring compliance and cost optimization.
Our articles make government information more accessible. Please consult a qualified professional for financial, legal, or health advice specific to your circumstances.
