Last updated 3 months ago. Our resources are updated regularly but please keep in mind that links, programs, policies, and contact information do change.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is a cabinet-level agency of the federal government responsible for developing and executing policies on food, agriculture, natural resources, rural development, and nutrition. Often called the “People’s Department” since its founding by President Abraham Lincoln in 1862, as noted by the National Farmers Union, the USDA touches the lives of Americans every day – from the food we eat and the safety of our meat, to support for farmers and rural communities.
Mission Statement
The official mission of the USDA is rooted in service to Americans through sound agricultural policy and stewardship of resources. According to Performance.gov, the USDA’s mission is “to serve all Americans by providing effective, innovative, science-based public policy leadership in agriculture, food and nutrition, natural resource protection and management, rural development, and related issues,” with a commitment to equitable and climate-smart opportunities. In simpler terms, the USDA’s mission is to provide leadership on agriculture and food issues, ensure access to safe and nutritious food, support farmers and rural economies, and conserve natural resources for future generations. The department’s vision includes helping rural America thrive economically, nourishing Americans and people worldwide through agricultural productivity, and preserving the nation’s land, water, and forests through conservation, as stated on the USDA website.
Functions and Responsibilities
USDA’s responsibilities are broad, encompassing everything from farm services to nutrition programs. The department is organized into multiple “mission areas” that focus on different aspects of its work, as outlined on the USDA Mission Areas page. Below are some of the major programs and services that USDA provides:
Food Safety
Ensuring the safety of the nation’s food supply is a core USDA function. The Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) is the public health agency within USDA tasked with inspecting and regulating meat, poultry, and egg products to protect consumers. FSIS inspectors monitor processing plants to enforce standards set by laws like the Federal Meat Inspection Act and the Poultry Products Inspection Act. This means that when Americans buy a steak or chicken at the grocery store, USDA has likely inspected it for safety. By keeping diseased or contaminated products off the shelves, USDA’s food safety programs help prevent foodborne illnesses and build consumer confidence in U.S. agricultural products.
Food Assistance and Nutrition
USDA plays a leading role in fighting hunger and improving nutrition, chiefly through the Food and Nutrition Service (FNS). This agency administers federal food assistance programs that support millions of Americans. The largest program is the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly “food stamps”), which provides monthly benefits to low-income individuals and families to purchase groceries. FNS also runs the National School Lunch Program, the Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) nutrition program, school breakfast and summer meals for children, and others. The goal is to harness America’s agricultural abundance to reduce food insecurity and ensure people have access to a healthy diet. For example, SNAP currently serves over 42 million people (about 12% of the U.S. population) in an average month, according to Brookings Institution research, making it one of the country’s most far-reaching social programs. USDA also provides nutrition education and publishes dietary guidelines (in collaboration with HHS) to promote healthy eating. These efforts not only help families in need but also support farmers by increasing demand for U.S. food products.
Rural Development
Supporting the economic and social vitality of rural America is another major USDA responsibility. Through its Rural Development (RD) mission area, USDA finances and facilitates a wide range of services for rural communities, as detailed in FDIC reporting on USDA programs. This includes programs that fund rural housing loans, the construction of hospitals, schools, and public facilities, and the expansion of critical infrastructure like water systems, electricity, and broadband internet in remote areas. For instance, USDA’s ReConnect program provides grants and loans to expand high-speed internet access in areas that lack it, helping bridge the digital divide. RD programs also back loans for rural businesses and renewable energy projects, aiming to create jobs and foster innovation outside of urban centers. By opening doors to capital and providing technical assistance, USDA’s rural development efforts seek to ensure that small towns and farming communities can thrive economically. In short, USDA serves as a catalyst for improving quality of life in rural America – whether by financing a new rural health clinic or helping a first-time homebuyer get a mortgage in a farming town.
Conservation and Natural Resources
USDA is a key steward of America’s natural resources, working to conserve soil, water, forests, and wildlife habitats. One part of this mission is carried out on private lands through the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and Farm Service Agency (FSA). These agencies partner with farmers and ranchers on programs to encourage conservation practices – for example, providing financial incentives to plant cover crops, rotate grazing, reduce soil erosion, or set aside sensitive lands as wildlife habitat. Such programs (often authorized by the Farm Bill) include the Conservation Reserve Program (paying farmers to leave erosion-prone land fallow), the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP), and the Conservation Stewardship Program, among others, as highlighted in USDA press releases on conservation initiatives. On public lands, the U.S. Forest Service (which is part of USDA) manages 193 million acres of national forests and grasslands. The Forest Service balances multiple uses – from timber harvesting and recreation to wildfire management and ecosystem protection – with the mission of sustaining these lands for future generations. Through these conservation efforts, USDA helps maintain healthy soils for farming, clean water, and resilient ecosystems. It also positions agriculture as part of the solution to environmental challenges: for instance, promoting “climate-smart” agriculture that sequesters carbon in soil or planting trees to absorb CO₂. By working with both private landowners and managing public forests, USDA plays a dual role in environmental conservation and natural resource management.
Agricultural Research and Innovation
Advancing agricultural knowledge and technology is another vital USDA function. The department has a dedicated Research, Education, and Economics arm, which includes agencies like the Agricultural Research Service (ARS), the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA), the Economic Research Service (ERS), and the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS). Through these agencies, USDA conducts and funds research to improve crop yields, combat plant and animal diseases, develop new farming techniques, and ensure a safe, sustainable food supply. For example, ARS scientists might develop a new drought-resistant variety of wheat, or research ways to combat invasive pests without heavy pesticides. NIFA provides grants to land-grant universities and supports the Cooperative Extension System, which brings practical research-based knowledge to farmers in every county (think of county extension agents who advise on crop management or 4-H youth programs). USDA research has led to innovations like improved rice strains, more efficient irrigation methods, and safer food processing practices. By investing in science and education, the USDA helps American agriculture remain productive and competitive. These efforts benefit not only farmers, but all consumers – yielding more abundant, affordable food and new products (from biofuels to biodegradable plastics) derived from agriculture.
In addition to the above areas, USDA also oversees agricultural marketing and trade (opening global markets for U.S. products and ensuring fair marketing practices), manages animal and plant health (to prevent diseases and invasive species via the APHIS agency), and enforces standards like organic certification and animal welfare regulations. In essence, if it relates to farming, food, or rural life, there’s likely a part of USDA devoted to it.
Recent Developments (2020–2025)
In the past few years, the USDA has navigated significant challenges and launched new initiatives in response to evolving national priorities. Here are some key developments from 2020 through 2025:
- COVID-19 Pandemic Response: The pandemic that began in 2020 disrupted both food supply chains and farmers’ markets. USDA responded with emergency programs to support producers and get food to families in need. Under the Coronavirus Food Assistance Program (CFAP), USDA provided up to $16 billion in direct payments to farmers and ranchers who suffered losses due to COVID-19 market disruptions, as announced in USDA press releases. Simultaneously, USDA stood up the Farmers to Families Food Box program, purchasing $3 billion in fresh produce, dairy, and meat from farmers (who had lost their usual restaurant or school markets) and delivering these foods in boxes to food banks and non-profits for distribution. By the end of 2021, more than 176 million food boxes had been delivered to struggling households across the country, according to the Government Accountability Office’s assessment. These actions helped prevent food waste on farms, saved jobs in food distribution, and provided relief to millions of Americans facing hunger during the pandemic.
- Nutrition Assistance Expansion: Along with emergency pandemic aid, USDA strengthened long-term food assistance programs. In 2021, the Biden Administration directed USDA to re-evaluate the basis for SNAP benefit levels (the “Thrifty Food Plan”) to better reflect modern diet costs. This led to the largest-ever permanent increase in SNAP benefits in the program’s history. Starting in October 2021, the average SNAP benefit was boosted by about 21%, translating to an extra $36 per person per month, as detailed in USDA’s announcement. This update – the first revision of SNAP’s purchasing power since 1975 – aims to improve nutrition for low-income families and was considered long overdue. By putting more food within reach for vulnerable households, USDA not only addressed food insecurity made worse by COVID-19, but also invested in public health (since adequate nutrition helps prevent disease) and the economy (since SNAP dollars tend to get spent quickly at local groceries, supporting businesses). At the same time, USDA expanded other programs like Pandemic-EBT (which helped families buy groceries to replace missed school meals) and boosted WIC benefits for fruits and vegetables. These moves have been credited with keeping U.S. hunger rates from surging despite the economic hardships of the pandemic.
- Climate-Smart Agriculture Initiatives: Recent years have seen USDA take ambitious steps to address climate change and environmental sustainability in agriculture. In 2022, the department launched the Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities, a landmark initiative to incentivize farming practices that reduce greenhouse gases or sequester carbon. In the first round announced in September 2022, USDA funded 70 pilot projects with an investment of up to $2.8 billion, with plans to ultimately expand the program to over $3 billion, as reported in USDA press releases. These projects involve partnerships with farmers, ranchers, and forest owners to adopt practices like cover cropping, agroforestry, improved manure management, and other innovations that make commodities “climate-smart.” The idea is to create new market opportunities – for example, commodities grown with verified climate benefits might earn a premium or access new markets. Additionally, USDA’s conservation programs received a huge funding boost through the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, which dedicated roughly $19.5 billion in new funding over five years to help farmers implement climate-friendly conservation practices, as noted on Farmers.gov. This money strengthens popular programs like EQIP and CSP so more producers can build soil health, cut emissions, and adapt to extreme weather. With agriculture both impacted by and contributing to climate change, these initiatives mark a significant policy shift to make farms a centerpiece of climate solutions.
- Supply Chain and Market Reforms: The USDA in 2021–2022 also tackled issues in the agricultural supply chain exposed by the pandemic and other events. One focus has been the meat supply chain – after COVID outbreaks in meatpacking plants and price spikes for consumers, USDA committed $1 billion to support the expansion of independent meat processing capacity. The goal is to increase competition in an industry dominated by a few large companies and to make the food supply more resilient to shocks, as outlined in USDA’s commitment to fair markets and reported by Reuters. Grants have been offered to help smaller meat processors start up or expand, which in the long run may give farmers and ranchers more options to sell their livestock and get fair prices. USDA has also been working on tightening rules to protect farmers under the Packers and Stockyards Act (an older law that guards against unfair practices by meatpackers). Another area of focus is infrastructure in rural communities: for example, implementing the bipartisan Infrastructure Law (2021) which provided funds for rural broadband and water systems often administered by USDA. And when supply chain issues contributed to inflation in food prices in 2022, USDA convened a Supply Chain Task Force to find ways to ease transportation and logistical bottlenecks in the delivery of agricultural goods.
- Ongoing Challenges: As of 2023–2025, USDA faces some important upcoming decisions and hurdles. One is the development of the 2023 Farm Bill (a massive legislation package renewed every five years that funds most USDA programs). Debates in Congress over this Farm Bill have been intense, with questions about how much to spend on SNAP versus farm subsidies (more on that in a later section). Another challenge has been addressing equity issues – USDA has acknowledged a history of discrimination (for instance, Black farmers denied loans in past decades) and is working to implement new programs for underserved farmers. However, an attempt in 2021 to provide debt relief specifically to minority farmers was halted by lawsuits and replaced in 2022 by a race-neutral assistance program, as covered by Reuters, which remains a contentious topic. Finally, external factors like animal disease outbreaks (for example, a severe avian influenza outbreak in 2022–2023 affecting poultry) and extreme weather events (droughts, wildfires, hurricanes affecting farms and forests) have required USDA to ramp up its emergency programs. The department has been delivering disaster aid to ranchers hit by drought, firefighting resources to wildfires on federal and state lands, and research into making agriculture more resilient. Navigating these challenges while carrying out its daily services means the USDA agenda for 2020–2025 has been exceptionally busy.
Historical Context
The USDA’s origins date back over 160 years and its role has greatly evolved over time. The department was established on May 15, 1862, when President Abraham Lincoln signed legislation to create a Department of Agriculture amidst the Civil War, as noted in USDA’s blog on its anniversary. Lincoln, who grew up farming, saw agriculture as critical to America’s success – he famously called USDA “The People’s Department,” reflecting the idea that its work benefited everyone, not just farmers, according to the National Farmers Union. In the same year, Congress also passed the Homestead Act and the Morrill Act (which created land-grant colleges for agricultural education), setting the stage for a transformation of rural America.
In its early years, the USDA was a small bureau focused on collecting agricultural statistics, researching improved seeds and plants, and distributing those findings to farmers. An example of its early work: USDA scientists conducted “practical and scientific experiments” on crops and distributed new seed varieties to help farmers boost production. By 1889, USDA had grown in importance and was elevated to a Cabinet-level department headed by a Secretary of Agriculture.
Throughout the 20th century, the USDA’s responsibilities expanded dramatically in response to national needs:
- 1900s: After Upton Sinclair’s The Jungle raised public alarm about meatpacking conditions, the Meat Inspection Act of 1906 and Pure Food and Drug Act led USDA (and the future FDA) to begin oversight of food safety. USDA also spearheaded efforts to combat livestock diseases and improve nutrition (introducing the first food guides).
- 1930s (New Deal era): The Great Depression and Dust Bowl saw USDA take on a central role in economic relief and conservation. The Agricultural Adjustment Act tried to stabilize crop prices; the Soil Conservation Service (now NRCS) was created in 1935 to tackle the Dust Bowl by promoting better soil practices; and the Rural Electrification Administration brought electricity to farm communities. Many New Deal programs laid the foundation for today’s farm subsidies and conservation programs.
- 1960s–1970s: During the 1960s War on Poverty, USDA assumed responsibility for federal food assistance. The Food Stamp Program (now SNAP) was expanded nationwide in 1964, and the National School Lunch Program (originating in 1946) was joined by the School Breakfast Program and WIC in the late 1960s and 1970s. These moves firmly established USDA as the lead agency battling hunger. At the same time, Secretary of Agriculture Earl Butz in the 1970s encouraged farmers to “plant fencerow to fencerow,” reflecting a policy shift toward maximizing production and exporting surpluses. The environmental movement also led to the passage of laws affecting USDA – such as the Forest Management Act – and the creation of programs supporting organic farming and forestry management.
- 1980s–2000s: The farm debt crisis of the 1980s prompted new farm credit and crop insurance reforms through USDA. In 1994, a reorganization under Secretary Dan Glickman streamlined USDA’s many agencies into the mission-area structure we see today. The late 1990s and 2000s saw growth in international trade (USDA’s Foreign Agricultural Service helped open markets abroad) and new programs like the Conservation Reserve Program (actually started in 1985) expanding to tens of millions of acres retired for conservation. USDA also became involved in emerging issues like biofuel development (ethanol from corn) and food safety scares (implementing HACCP requirements in meat processing in the 90s).
Across history, the scope of USDA has grown from an agency advising farmers to a multi-faceted department that influences broad swaths of American life. Yet its core mission remains what Lincoln envisioned: to apply science, education, and good policy to ensure agriculture flourishes and people are fed. USDA’s history also includes challenges, notably a record of racial discrimination in providing farm loans and assistance – a legacy the department has been working to address (such as through the Pigford settlements in the late 1990s and current outreach to minority farmers). Understanding this historical journey helps explain why USDA today manages everything from crop insurance to food stamps under one roof.
Impact of the USDA
The USDA’s programs have a profound impact on various groups and on the nation as a whole. Here we discuss how USDA influences farmers, consumers, rural communities, food security, and environmental conservation:
Impact on Farmers
For America’s farmers and ranchers, USDA is both a partner and a safety net. The department provides direct support that can make the difference between surviving a bad year or going out of business. For instance, USDA’s farm programs offer crop insurance and disaster assistance that protect farmers against risks like droughts, floods, or sudden price drops. Federal crop insurance (partly subsidized by USDA) covers the vast majority of cropland – over 445 million acres in recent years – giving farmers compensation if their yield is ruined by weather or pests. USDA’s Farm Service Agency also administers commodity programs that stabilize prices or offer income support for staple crops (corn, wheat, soybeans, cotton, etc.), often through the Farm Bill’s farm subsidy titles. These safety net programs are designed to mitigate the inherent volatility in agriculture. In addition, USDA provides farmers with low-interest loans (for example, to buy land or equipment), technical advice through the Extension Service, and market information and promotion to help sell their products. The impact is evident in farm finances: during downturns or crises, a significant portion of farm income can come from USDA programs (for example, during the 2020 pandemic and trade war, federal payments including CFAP and trade aid comprised an unusually high share of farm income). By smoothing out the booms and busts, USDA’s support helps keep the nation’s 2 million family farms in operation and ensures a stable domestic food supply. Many farmers, especially beginning or small-scale producers, also rely on USDA conservation programs for cost-share funds to improve their land (like installing efficient irrigation or fencing livestock out of streams). These investments not only benefit the environment but can improve a farm’s productivity and resilience over time. In short, USDA’s presence is felt on farms big and small, providing resources, research, and risk management that enable U.S. agriculture to be one of the most productive in the world.
Impact on Consumers and Food Security
For consumers, the USDA’s influence is most directly felt in the grocery aisle and at the dinner table. Thanks to USDA inspection stamps, Americans can trust that their meat and poultry are safe to eat – a foundational assurance that underpins public confidence in the food supply. Beyond food safety, USDA’s nutrition programs have a major societal impact by improving food security for tens of millions of people. Programs like SNAP, WIC, and school meals reduce hunger and malnutrition, especially among children. In 2022, about 41.9 million people in 22.2 million households received SNAP benefits, translating to roughly one in eight Americans, according to Pew Research data. This assistance is linked to better outcomes: research shows SNAP reduces poverty and food insecurity rates, and school meal programs contribute to better academic performance and health for children. By increasing access to food, USDA’s nutrition assistance also pumps money into local economies (every $1 in SNAP benefits is estimated to generate about $1.50 in economic activity, as reported in USDA’s economic research). Even consumers not on federal assistance benefit from USDA’s work. The department’s dietary guidelines and nutrition education campaigns (like MyPlate) influence public health initiatives and food product labeling. USDA grades on eggs or beef provide quality signals in the marketplace. And when emergencies strike – be it a hurricane or economic recession – USDA’s food programs often expand or adjust to meet rising need, serving as a buffer against societal hardship. Overall, USDA’s impact on consumers is about keeping food available, affordable, safe, and nutritious, thereby upholding food security as a basic element of national well-being.
Impact on Rural Communities
USDA’s reach into rural communities is unique among federal agencies. In many small towns, USDA-backed projects are behind the scenes powering daily life – the clean water coming out of the tap, the health clinic down the road, or the new houses built for local families might all be financed through USDA Rural Development. The impact is both economic and social. Through business loans and grants, USDA helps create jobs in rural areas, whether by funding an agricultural processing facility or a rural manufacturing startup. The agency’s housing programs have enabled countless rural Americans to become homeowners with affordable mortgages guaranteed by USDA. In fact, between 2009 and 2018, USDA Rural Development helped about 1.1 million rural families buy, refinance, or repair their homes (an indicator of scale), as documented in FDIC reporting on USDA programs. Community facilities grants have built libraries, fire stations, and schools, improving quality of life and public safety. Importantly, USDA has been at the forefront of expanding rural broadband internet – a modern lifeline for education, healthcare (telemedicine), and entrepreneurship. Programs like ReConnect and the Telecommunications Infrastructure Loans have brought high-speed internet to hundreds of thousands of rural households that previously had no service. While there is still a gap between urban and rural connectivity, USDA’s efforts are narrowing it, which can help attract new residents or businesses to rural counties. Additionally, USDA’s cooperative extension presence in rural counties (often through local 4-H clubs or farm advisors) fosters community and knowledge-sharing. By investing in infrastructure and people outside metropolitan areas, USDA helps combat rural poverty and population loss. The vitality of small-town America – from Appalachia to the Great Plains – owes much to decades of USDA initiatives supporting rural prosperity and resilience.
Impact on Environmental Conservation
Through its conservation and forestry programs, USDA significantly influences environmental health and land stewardship across the country. On agricultural lands, USDA-funded conservation practices have reduced soil erosion by millions of tons and improved water quality in rivers and streams. For example, farmers enrolled in the Conservation Reserve Program have set aside roughly 20–30 million acres of marginal farmland to grow grass or trees instead of crops, providing habitat for wildlife and preventing erosion. Wetlands restored through USDA programs help recharge groundwater and mitigate flooding. The NRCS works one-on-one with producers on thousands of conservation plans each year, bringing practices like nutrient management (to prevent fertilizer runoff) and integrated pest management into wider use. The environmental benefits are cumulative – healthier soils sequester more carbon and require less fertilizer, and well-managed grazing lands can sustain biodiversity. One measurable impact: USDA estimates that since the Dust Bowl era, conservation efforts have cut U.S. cropland soil erosion by more than 40%, preserving the long-term productivity of our farmland. In the realm of forestry, the USDA Forest Service’s impact is seen in both conservation and recreation. The Forest Service manages national forests that provide clean drinking water to millions of Americans, sequester vast amounts of carbon, and harbor wildlife from elk to salmon. At the same time, those lands support recreation for about 150 million visits each year, and sustainable timber harvesting that supplies the wood products industry. When it comes to wildfires – a growing concern in the West – USDA plays a lead role in firefighting and forest restoration to reduce extreme fire risk. The Forest Service is actively thinning overgrown forests and conducting prescribed burns on millions of acres as a preventative measure. While challenges like climate change and invasive species continue to pressure ecosystems, USDA’s conservation programs and science-based management are key tools the U.S. relies on to protect the environment. The concept of working lands conservation (allowing production and conservation to coexist) championed by USDA shows that farming and ranching can be compatible with, and even enhance, environmental goals. As consumers increasingly care about sustainable food, the USDA’s support for organic agriculture, soil health, and climate-smart practices means the agency’s impact extends to global environmental objectives as well.
Public and Political Debates
Given the breadth of USDA’s activities, it’s no surprise that many of its policies spark public debate and political discussion. Here are a few ongoing debates and controversies related to the USDA:
- Nutrition Assistance and SNAP: The SNAP program, because of its size, is often at the center of policy debates. Some lawmakers argue that SNAP spending (over $100 billion annually in recent years) should be reduced or that stricter work requirements should be imposed on able-bodied adults. For instance, during deliberations on the 2023–2024 Farm Bill, proposals were made to cut SNAP by tens of billions of dollars by scaling back benefit increases, according to Brookings Institution analysis. Proponents of cuts claim it would encourage employment and reduce government costs, while opponents argue that such moves would increase hunger and punish the poor. This partisan tug-of-war over SNAP reflects a broader debate on the government’s role in addressing poverty. Despite political rhetoric, SNAP has historically had strong bipartisan support in farm bills, in part because urban lawmakers back nutrition programs and rural lawmakers back farm subsidies (creating a coalition that passes both). The tension between addressing food insecurity and managing federal costs continues to be a central USDA policy debate.
- Farm Subsidies and Equity: Another contentious topic is the distribution of farm subsidies and supports. Critics point out that a large share of USDA commodity and insurance benefits flow to the biggest farms, rather than small family farmers. According to analyses by USDA’s Economic Research Service, the largest 10% of farms by size receive over half of all commodity payments and an even greater share of crop insurance indemnities, fueling concerns that current policies encourage consolidation, as reported by the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition. Advocacy groups and budget watchdogs sometimes call for subsidy limits or means-testing to ensure payments don’t just make “the rich richer.” On the other side, major farm organizations argue that large farms receive more aid simply because they have more land and production at risk, and that cutting support could jeopardize the U.S. food supply. There’s also debate about what to subsidize – traditional programs mainly back commodity crops like corn and wheat, but some want more support for specialty crops (fruits/vegetables), organic farming, or local food systems. These debates often heat up during farm bill negotiations, balancing fiscal responsibility, fairness to small farmers, and the economic realities of modern farming.
- Civil Rights and Inclusion: The USDA has faced scrutiny over its treatment of minority farmers. A landmark class-action lawsuit (Pigford v. Glickman) in the 1990s revealed that USDA’s farm loan programs had discriminated against Black farmers for decades, leading to settlements and reforms. In recent years, the department under the Biden administration made equity a priority, creating an equity commission and seeking to right past wrongs. However, efforts like the 2021 debt relief program for “socially disadvantaged” farmers (which included Black, Native American, Hispanic, and Asian farmers) met resistance – white farmers filed lawsuits calling the race-based aid unfair, and courts halted the program. Congress replaced it with a race-neutral program in 2022, disappointing some Black farmer groups who saw it as a broken promise, as covered by Reuters. This situation underscores an ongoing debate: how to correct historical inequities in a lawful, effective way. USDA’s challenge is to earn trust among farmers of color who have felt ignored or mistreated, while designing programs that can withstand legal and political pushback. The conversation continues as new initiatives (e.g. increasing outreach, providing technical help, and allocating funds for underserved farmers) roll out. Civil rights at USDA also extend to its own workforce and program access – topics of internal reforms and oversight.
- Climate and Environmental Regulation: There is public dialogue around USDA’s approach to environmental issues, especially climate change. Many in the agricultural community favor voluntary, incentive-based conservation (the traditional USDA approach), while some environmental advocates argue for stronger regulatory measures on things like fertilizer runoff, methane emissions from livestock, or land use. USDA’s climate-smart initiatives have been largely welcomed, but there are debates on specifics: for example, how to measure and verify carbon sequestration on farms, or whether paying farmers for carbon storage (a sort of carbon market) is the best use of funds. Additionally, the logging practices on national forests spark debate between timber industry supporters and conservationists who prioritize habitat and recreation. In recent years, catastrophic wildfires have added urgency to debates about how the Forest Service should balance thinning forests vs. preserving untouched wilderness. The USDA often has to navigate between agricultural interests and environmental groups, seeking “win-win” solutions like those that improve farm income and environmental outcomes. Nonetheless, disagreements persist on issues like the use of genetically modified crops, pesticide regulations (which involve both EPA and USDA), and animal welfare standards in farming – all areas where USDA has either a direct role or an influential voice.
- Farm Bill and Budget Priorities: Every five years, the Farm Bill debate essentially encapsulates all the above tensions. The Farm Bill brings together nutrition programs and farm supports in one massive piece of legislation. In recent cycles, about 76–84% of Farm Bill funding is for nutrition programs like SNAP, according to Brookings Institution research, which some rural-focused lawmakers resent, whereas farm programs are a smaller slice that some urban-focused lawmakers question. This leads to perennial “food vs. farm” funding debates. For example, as noted, the House version of the 2024 Farm Bill proposed significant SNAP cuts, provoking controversy. At the same time, there are debates about crop insurance funding levels, payment caps for commodity subsidies, and how much to fund conservation or research. The fact that the 2023 Farm Bill is projected to cost $1.5 trillion over 5 years – the first to exceed $1 trillion – has intensified scrutiny from budget hawks. Ultimately, these debates are about how taxpayer dollars should be allocated within USDA’s portfolio, and they often reflect broader philosophies on government intervention in markets and social safety nets. The Farm Bill negotiation process is closely watched not just by farmers and anti-hunger groups, but by anyone concerned with deficit spending or economic policy, making USDA’s policies a microcosm of larger political debates in the U.S.
