Last updated 3 months ago. Our resources are updated regularly but please keep in mind that links, programs, policies, and contact information do change.
“Make America Great Again” has evolved from a campaign slogan into a framework for government reform. The phrase now represents a detailed vision for restructuring federal government.
At the heart of this framework sits a belief that America has declined from a past era of greatness and that fundamental restructuring of federal government is required to reverse course.
The most detailed public blueprint for this vision is “Project 2025,” a 920-page plan developed by the conservative Heritage Foundation and over 100 partner organizations.
This document, officially titled “Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise,” serves as an agency-by-agency guide for a potential conservative administration.
The Worldview Behind the Agenda
To understand the proposed reforms, you need to grasp the worldview that drives them. The MAGA movement builds on a narrative of national decline, arguing that America has lost its former greatness due to globalization, immigration, multiculturalism, and foreign influence.
The prescribed remedy is an “America First” philosophy that prioritizes economic protectionism, significant reduction in immigration, and restoration of what proponents call “traditional American values.”
The “Deep State” Problem
A central antagonist in this narrative is the “deep state” or “administrative state”—the belief that a vast, unelected, and unaccountable federal bureaucracy actively works to undermine the will of the American people and their elected president.
This perspective reframes the challenge from changing specific policies to fundamentally dismantling the existing operational structure of government. The primary target for reform isn’t just what the government does, but what it is.
While the MAGA slogan has roots in Reagan’s 1980 campaign, its modern ideological underpinnings connect to a school of thought known as paleoconservatism. This philosophy argues that America is on the “brink of destruction” because it has strayed from foundational principles of “Family, God, and Patriotism” and has been “steadily ruined” by a misguided focus on equality and liberal individualism.
Crisis Justifies Revolution
This intellectual framework, long nurtured by conservative institutions like the Heritage Foundation and the Claremont Institute, casts the current political landscape not as routine policy debate but as an existential battle for the nation’s survival.
This sense of crisis explains the sweeping, often revolutionary nature of the proposed reforms, which are presented not as incremental adjustments but as necessary and urgent “regime change” to avert national collapse.
Project 2025: The Operational Blueprint
The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 is the most concrete manifestation of this ideological agenda. It’s the ninth iteration of the Mandate for Leadership series, a collection of policy guides that have served as a “policy bible” for conservative administrations since the Reagan era, which implemented nearly two-thirds of the 1981 edition’s proposals.
The current project is unparalleled in scope and ambition. Assembled with a $22 million budget and collaboration of over 100 conservative organizations, its stated goal is to “institutionalize Trumpism” and prepare a conservative administration to “go to work on Day One to deconstruct the administrative state.”
Four Strategic Pillars
The structure of Project 2025 reveals it’s more than just a policy book—it’s a comprehensive operational plan designed to install a pre-built government-in-waiting. The project builds on four strategic pillars:
The Policy Agenda: The 920-page Mandate for Leadership book, which provides detailed, chapter-by-chapter plans to reform or dismantle every major federal agency.
The Personnel Database: A “LinkedIn-style” digital platform to identify, vet, and prepare tens of thousands of conservative, politically aligned individuals to fill government roles. This is based on the Reagan-era maxim that “personnel is policy” and ensures the new administration is staffed with loyalists committed to the agenda.
The Presidential Administration Academy: An online training program designed to equip incoming political appointees with knowledge to “seize the gears of power” and effectively navigate—or overcome—the existing federal bureaucracy.
The 180-Day Playbook: A detailed implementation guide for each agency, outlining a sequence of executive orders, regulatory changes, and other actions to be taken in the first 180 days to ensure rapid and irreversible change.
This four-part structure, combining pre-written policies with pre-vetted personnel and tactical training, represents a significant evolution in presidential transitions.
A Private Transition Team
While the Heritage Foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-profit, the project’s explicit goal of “institutionalizing Trumpism,” its authorship by over 140 former Trump administration officials, and its function as a recruitment and planning vehicle effectively create a privately funded, parallel transition team that operates outside the official, taxpayer-funded process.
| Policy Sector | Core Objective | Key Proposals | Stated Justification | Relevant Mandate Chapters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Executive Power & Civil Service | Centralize power in the Presidency | Reinstate and expand Schedule F to reclassify tens of thousands of civil servants as at-will employees; end DOJ/FBI independence. | Make bureaucracy accountable to the President and remove “deep state” opposition. | Chapters 1-3, 10 |
| Economy & Tax | Implement “reciprocal” trade and cut taxes | Impose a baseline tariff of 10% or higher on all imports; simplify individual taxes to two rates (15%/30%); cut corporate tax to 18%. | End unfair trade deficits that harm U.S. industry; stimulate economic growth and simplify the tax code. | Chapters 25, 27 |
| Immigration | End illegal immigration and restrict legal pathways | Conduct mass deportation of undocumented immigrants; end birthright citizenship; dismantle the asylum system; complete the border wall. | Restore the rule of law at the border and protect national sovereignty. | Chapter 5 |
| Domestic & Social Policy | Enforce conservative social and cultural values | Eliminate the Department of Education; use the Comstock Act to restrict abortion access; remove all DEI initiatives from government. | Return power over education to states and parents; protect the unborn; end “woke” ideology in federal agencies. | Chapters 13, 14, 21 |
| Foreign Policy & National Security | Implement an “America First” foreign policy | Re-evaluate NATO commitments and demand allies increase defense spending; withdraw from the Paris Climate Accord and other international agreements. | Ensure allies pay their fair share for defense; protect U.S. sovereignty from globalist organizations. | Chapters 4, 6 |
Remaking the Executive Branch
The cornerstone of the MAGA agenda for government reform is the dramatic expansion and consolidation of presidential power over the executive branch. This effort is legally justified by a controversial interpretation of the Constitution known as the unitary executive theory.
This theory holds that the president has absolute control over the entire executive branch, including independent agencies and all federal employees. Proponents argue that civil service protections and the independence of agencies like the Federal Reserve or Department of Justice are unconstitutional infringements on the president’s authority as the sole head of the executive branch.
Schedule F: The Control Mechanism
The primary tool for achieving this control is the planned reinstatement of an executive order creating “Schedule F.” This order would reclassify tens of thousands of federal civil servants—potentially 50,000 or more—from career professionals with employment protections to at-will employees who can be fired for any reason, including political loyalty.
This would represent the most significant change to the federal workforce since the creation of the merit-based civil service in 1883, which was designed to end the political corruption of the 19th-century “spoils system.”
The Accountability Argument
Proponents argue that Schedule F is necessary to restore accountability. The title of the executive order is “Restoring Accountability To Policy-Influencing Positions Within the Federal Workforce.”
In this view, accountability means federal employees must be directly accountable to the president, the only nationally elected official in the executive branch. This is intended to solve the problem of a permanent bureaucracy that may be ideologically opposed to a new administration’s agenda and can use its position to slow or block policy implementation.
The Opposition Case
Critics argue that this redefines accountability in a dangerous way. The current civil service system is designed to ensure that employees are accountable first and foremost to the law and the Constitution, not to a particular president or political party.
By making employment contingent on political loyalty, critics contend that Schedule F would destroy the non-partisan expertise of the civil service and empower a president to use the federal government to punish political enemies and reward allies, leading to widespread corruption and abuse of power.
Massive Scope
The federal executive branch employs approximately 2.3 million civilians. While Schedule F would target policy-related roles, its broad definition could encompass a vast swath of senior and mid-level employees across every agency, from scientists and economists to attorneys and program managers.
The implementation of Schedule F isn’t merely one proposal among many—it’s the essential prerequisite for the rest of the Project 2025 agenda. The plan’s authors anticipate that without the ability to remove career staff who might resist, radical changes in areas like environmental regulation, immigration enforcement, or education would be slowed or stopped by institutional friction.
Schedule F is the tool designed to clear that path, making control of the federal workforce the foundational step upon which all other reforms are built.
Targeting Justice and FBI
A key target for this assertion of executive control is the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Project 2025 calls for dismantling the post-Watergate norms that have traditionally created a wall between the White House and federal law enforcement decisions.
The plan proposes to “reexamine” policies that limit White House communications with the DOJ regarding active investigations. It also calls for a top-to-bottom review of all major FBI investigations to ensure they align with the president’s political agenda and for placing political loyalists in key positions throughout the department to “promote the President’s agenda.”
Economic and Tax Overhaul
Building on the foundation of a politically controlled workforce, Project 2025 lays out comprehensive plans to remake nearly every facet of federal government.
Radical Tax Simplification
The plan calls for radical simplification of the individual income tax code, replacing the current seven-bracket structure with just two rates: 15% and 30%. This change would be accompanied by the elimination of most deductions and tax credits.
The corporate tax rate would be lowered from 21% to 18%, and the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act would be made permanent. The long-term goal articulated in the plan is to eventually abolish the income tax altogether and replace it with a national consumption tax, such as a sales tax.
Reciprocal Tariffs
Citing large and persistent trade deficits—which totaled $903.5 billion in 2024—as a threat to national security, the agenda’s central trade policy is the imposition of “reciprocal tariffs.”
This would begin with a baseline tariff of 10% on all imports, with significantly higher rates levied on goods from countries that either run large trade surpluses with the U.S. or impose higher tariffs on American products. This policy is seen not just as an economic tool but as a weapon to force the onshoring of manufacturing and rebuild America’s industrial base.
Sweeping Deregulation
The agenda mandates a sweeping rollback of federal regulations. This includes dismantling the Environmental Protection Agency’s climate change programs, repealing the Dodd-Frank Act’s financial regulations, and abolishing the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
The stated justification is that “excess regulation harms economic activity” and stifles growth.
Immigration and Border Security
Mass Deportation Operation
The plan calls for the “largest domestic deportation operation in American history.” To achieve this, it proposes ending policies that prohibit enforcement actions in “sensitive locations” like schools, hospitals, and churches.
It also advocates for deploying the U.S. military and National Guard for domestic immigration enforcement and using “expedited removal”—a process that bypasses immigration courts—against any undocumented immigrant found anywhere in the country.
Border Infrastructure
The agenda calls for finishing the wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, a project with remaining sections estimated to cost between $15 billion and $25 billion. It also proposes reinstating the “Remain in Mexico” policy, which requires asylum seekers to wait in Mexico while their cases are processed.
The plan grants the Secretary of Homeland Security authority to unilaterally suspend all immigration laws in the event of a “mass migration event.”
Restructuring Legal Immigration
The plan aims to fundamentally restructure the legal immigration system. It seeks to dismantle the asylum system by drastically raising the “credible fear” standard for applicants and eliminating domestic or gang violence as grounds for asylum.
Furthermore, it calls for an end to birthright citizenship for the children of undocumented immigrants, the repeal of Temporary Protected Status for hundreds of thousands of people, and the termination of family-based migration categories, often referred to by critics as “chain migration.”
Social and Cultural Policy
The Project 2025 agenda proposes using the full weight of the federal government to enforce a specific vision of American culture and society. This isn’t limited to a few policy areas but represents a “whole-of-government” approach to cultural issues.
Eliminating the Education Department
The central proposal is the complete elimination of the U.S. Department of Education. Its programs would either be terminated, such as the Head Start early childhood program, or devolved to the states. The plan also advocates for federal legislation to promote private school voucher programs.
Healthcare and Reproductive Rights
The agenda calls for the Department of Justice to enforce the 19th-century Comstock Act, which could be interpreted to ban the mailing of abortion pills and related materials nationwide. It also directs the Food and Drug Administration to reverse its long-standing approval of the abortion medication mifepristone.
On broader healthcare, it proposes cuts to Medicare and Medicaid, including potential lifetime caps on Medicaid coverage, and making private Medicare Advantage plans the default option for seniors.
Civil Rights and Cultural Issues
A key priority is the complete eradication of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion initiatives across the federal government. The plan explicitly calls for deleting terms such as “DEI,” “gender equality,” “gender equity,” and “abortion” from every federal rule, regulation, and piece of legislation.
It proposes rolling back federal non-discrimination protections for LGBTQ+ individuals, banning transgender people from serving in the military, and directing the Department of Health and Human Services to issue regulations declaring that “men and women are biological realities and married men and women are the ideal, natural family.”
Foreign Policy Revolution
“America First” in Practice
The foreign policy outlined in Project 2025 is a rejection of what it calls “globalism” in favor of strict defense of national sovereignty. Alliances are viewed not as partnerships rooted in shared values but as transactional arrangements based on temporary alignments of interest.
NATO and Alliance Changes
The plan calls for a “fundamental re-evaluation” of NATO, demanding that all member nations not only meet but significantly exceed current defense spending targets, with some proposals suggesting a new target of 5% of GDP.
Withdrawing from International Agreements
The agenda includes withdrawing the United States from the Paris Climate Accord and defunding or withdrawing from international bodies like the World Health Organization and certain United Nations programs that are perceived as undermining American sovereignty.
Economic Impact Projections
The proposals outlined in Project 2025 would represent a profound transformation of the American government and its role in the economy and society. Independent analyses of the economic proposals project significant and often disruptive consequences.
While proponents argue the policies will spur growth, many economic models predict otherwise. There’s a notable disconnect between traditional conservative rhetoric of fiscal discipline and the projected outcomes of the plan, which could dramatically increase the national debt.
Tax and Deficit Impact
While Project 2025 proposes deep cuts to federal spending, its tax plan would significantly reduce federal revenue. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that making the 2017 tax cuts permanent would, by itself, add $4.6 trillion to the national debt over a decade.
Analyses of the proposed two-bracket system suggest it would shift the tax burden, resulting in a tax increase of approximately $3,000 for a median family of four while providing substantial tax cuts to the wealthiest households.
Tariff Effects
The proposed tariff regime is projected to have a dual effect: raising significant revenue but also slowing economic growth and increasing prices for consumers. The CBO projects the tariffs would reduce real GDP by 0.6% by 2035 and increase inflation by an average of 0.4 percentage points in 2025 and 2026.
An analysis from the Yale Budget Lab projects a more severe impact, with a 2.3% rise in the consumer price level, equivalent to an annual loss of $3,800 in purchasing power for the average household.
| Policy Proposal | Analyzing Body | Projected 10-Year Revenue/Deficit Impact | Projected GDP Impact | Projected Impact on Inflation (Short-Term) | Projected Impact on Median Household |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extension of 2017 Tax Cuts | Congressional Budget Office (CBO) | +$4.6 trillion to deficit | Not specified in source | Not specified in source | Benefits disproportionately favor top 5% of taxpayers |
| Project 2025 Two-Rate Tax Plan | Center for American Progress | Not specified in source | Not specified in source | Not specified in source | +$3,000 tax increase for median family of four |
| Reciprocal Tariffs | CBO | -$2.8 trillion from deficit (net) | -0.6% by 2035 | +0.4 percentage points | Increased prices across all income groups |
| Reciprocal Tariffs | Yale Budget Lab / Penn Wharton | -$3.1 trillion from deficit (conventional) | -0.6% in long run | +2.3% | -$3,800 loss in purchasing power |
Immigration and Labor Impact
Economists project that a mass deportation on the scale envisioned would have a severe negative impact on the U.S. economy. With an estimated 7 million undocumented workers in the labor force, their removal would shrink the national GDP by a cumulative $4.7 trillion over a decade, according to an analysis by the Center for American Progress.
Such a policy would create acute labor shortages in key industries like agriculture, construction, and hospitality, leading to higher prices for food and housing.
Legal and Constitutional Concerns
Legal experts and civil liberties organizations have characterized Project 2025 as a blueprint for authoritarianism. Critics from the ACLU, the Brennan Center for Justice, and others argue that the plan’s central goal is to destroy the American system of checks and balances by concentrating unchecked power in the executive branch.
They warn that by politicizing the Department of Justice, dismantling the independent civil service, and asserting presidential control over all federal agencies, the plan would create an “imperial presidency” that operates above the law, threatening the rule of law and fundamental civil liberties.
Impact on Government Services
Beyond high-level economic and constitutional debates, the proposed reforms carry significant implications for day-to-day government functioning. While often framed as a “deconstruction” of the administrative state, the plan is equally a radical “reconstruction” of government to serve new ideological purposes.
For instance, while it calls for eliminating the Department of Education to reduce federal overreach, it also proposes creating new, powerful federal mechanisms to enforce a “Parents’ Bill of Rights” and administer a national school voucher program, representing a different kind of federal intervention in local education.
Service Delivery Risks
Replacing a merit-based civil service with political loyalists could severely degrade the government’s institutional knowledge and capacity to deliver essential services. Critics point to several potential consequences:
FEMA Response: The Federal Emergency Management Agency, if its costs are shifted to states and its expert staff is replaced, could see its ability to respond to natural disasters crippled.
Weather Services: The National Weather Service, which provides free, life-saving weather alerts, could be privatized, potentially putting critical safety information behind a paywall.
Scientific Research: Scientific and medical research could be politicized, with funding for agencies like the National Institutes of Health and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration cut or redirected based on political ideology rather than scientific merit.
Supporters’ Case for Reform
Supporters of the Project 2025 agenda argue that these radical reforms are necessary to save the country from an unaccountable, ideologically liberal “administrative state” that they believe has seized power from the American people.
In their view, the plan is a roadmap to restore constitutional order by reasserting the president’s rightful authority over the executive branch. They contend that by dismantling this bureaucracy, the government will become more efficient, more responsive to the will of the electorate, and more aligned with the nation’s founding principles.
Efficiency and Responsiveness
Proponents argue that the current federal bureaucracy is bloated, inefficient, and resistant to change. They believe that by replacing career civil servants with political appointees who share the administration’s vision, the government will be able to implement policy more quickly and effectively.
They also argue that making federal employees accountable to the president, who is directly elected by the people, will make the government more democratic and responsive to the public will.
Constitutional Restoration
From this perspective, the expansion of presidential power isn’t an authoritarian power grab but a restoration of the proper constitutional balance. Supporters argue that the unitary executive theory is the correct interpretation of the Constitution and that the growth of independent agencies and career civil service has unconstitutionally diluted presidential authority.
They see Project 2025 not as a radical departure from American tradition but as a return to the founders’ original intent for how the executive branch should function.
The plan represents the most comprehensive attempt to systematically restructure the federal government in modern American history. Whether viewed as necessary reform or dangerous authoritarianism, its implementation would fundamentally alter the relationship between citizens and their government, with consequences that would likely persist for generations.
Our articles make government information more accessible. Please consult a qualified professional for financial, legal, or health advice specific to your circumstances.
